Obama is/was an associate of the Chicago branch of the
Democratic Socialists of America
year
event
Note:
With the exception of some background
entries at the top of this list, this page is organized alphabetically,
by political issue.
Background
Barack Obama was born
of Marxists; mentored by a communist writer and activist;
spent his college days hanging around radical activists; worked as a
radical community organizer, learning the radical tactics of the
communist, Alinsky; attended a radical church; was introduced to Chicago
politics by a communist in the home of another communist;
and today lends his political skill to the international goals of
radical activists, and had radicals working on his campaign and in his
administration.
The fact is, Obama has been around Marxists, of one kind or another,
since the age of 12.
Frank
Marshall
Davis
Accuracy in Media has an in-depth
profile
of a leftist who influenced Obama during his high school years. In an
article entitled, "Obama's Communist Mentor," Cliff Kincaid identifies a
member of the Communist Party USA, who has been influential in Obama's
life and education, Frank Marshall Davis, who was a communist -- and
born in Kansas.
Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly
identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The
record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some
point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son,
with Davis, listening to his "poetry" and getting advice on his career
path. But Obama, in his book, "Dreams From My Father," refers to
him repeatedly as just "Frank." Frank is the black communist
writer now considered by some to be in the same category of prominence
as Maya Angelou and Alice Walker.
According to an interview with Dawn Weatherly-Williams, Obama returned
to Hawaii in the fall of 1970 to attend Punahou School. He first
met Frank Marshall Davis after he took the entrance exams.
Davis moved to Honolulu from Chicago in 1948 with his second wife Helen
Canfield, a white socialite, at the suggestion of his friend the actor
Paul Robeson, who advised them that there would be more tolerance of a
mixed race couple in Hawaii than on the American mainland.
Robeson, of course, was the well-known black actor and singer who served
as a member of the CPUSA and apologist for the old Soviet Union. Davis
had known Robeson from his time in Chicago.
The 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the
Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What's more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the
House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of
involvement in several communist-front organizations.
In his book, Obama writes about "a poet named Frank," who visited his
family in Hawaii, read poetry, and was full of "hard-earned knowledge"
and advice. Who was Frank? Obama only says that he had "some
modest notoriety once," was "a contemporary of Richard Wright and
Langston Hughes during his years in Chicago..." but was now "pushing
eighty." He writes about "Frank and his old Black Power dashiki
self" giving him advice before he left for Occidental College in 1979 at
the age of 18.
Davis wrote, "The genuine Communists I knew as well as others so labeled
had one principle in common: to use any and every means to abolish
racism." Davis said he wrote to give "the widest possible
publicity to the many instances of racism and the dissatisfaction of
Afro-American with the status quo."
Obama quoted him as saying: "Leaving your race at the door.
Leaving your people behind. Understand something, boy.
You’re not going to college to get educated. You’re going there to
get trained."
He added, "they’ll tank on your chain and let you know that you may be a
well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you’re a nigger just the same."
Is it possible that Obama did not know who Davis was when he wrote his
book? That's not plausible, since Obama refers to him as a
contemporary of Richard Wright and Langston Hughes and says he saw a
book of his black poetry.
But why? What does Obama have to say about this curious omission?
Could it have something to do with the fact that, by the time Obama
wrote his book, he knew that Davis was a Communist? And that he
deliberately covered this up? Or did he know it earlier?
This is the key question: What did Obama know and when did he know it?
Which of course raises the disturbing questions that must be asked:
Did Davis recruit Obama?
Professor Gerald Horne, a history professor at the University of
Houston, noted that Davis, came into contact with Barack Obama and his
family and became the young man's mentor, influencing Obama's sense of
identity and career moves.
As Horne describes it, Davis, who wrote the memoir, "Living the Blues,"
had "befriended" a "Euro-American family" that
had "migrated to Honolulu from Kansas and a young woman from this family
eventually had a child with a young student from Kenya East Africa who
goes by the name of Barack Obama, who retracing the steps of Davis
eventually decamped to Chicago."
Dr. Kathryn Takara, a professor of Interdisciplinary Studies at the
University of Hawaii at Manoa who also confirms that Davis is the
"Frank" in Obama’s book, did her dissertation on Davis and spent much
time with him between 1972 until he passed away in 1987.
In an analysis posted online, she notes that Davis, who was a columnist
for the Honolulu Record, brought "an acute sense of race relations and
class struggle throughout America and the world" and that he openly
discussed subjects such as American imperialism, colonialism and
exploitation. She described him as a "socialist realist" who attacked
the work of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Davis, in his own writings, had said that Robeson and Harry Bridges, the
head of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and a
secret member of the CPUSA, had suggested that he take a job as a
columnist with the Honolulu Record "and see if I could do something for
them." The ILWU was organizing workers there and Robeson’s contacts were
"passed on" to Davis, Takara writes.
Takara says that Davis "espoused freedom, radicalism, solidarity, labor
unions, due process, peace, affirmative action, civil rights, Negro
History week, and true Democracy to fight imperialism, colonialism, and
white supremacy. He urged coalition politics."
Poems from Davis are in the book "Black Moods" which was edited by John
Tidwell, a University of Kansas professor and expert on Davis' writings.
He
confirmed to Kincaid that Davis joined the Communist Party but that
he publicly tried to deny his affiliations.
Asked why Takara thought Obama didn't identify Frank in his book by his
full name, she replied, "Maybe, he didn't want people delving into it."
Stanley Dunham, Obama's grandfather, was
friends with Davis, a bohemian libertine who drank heavily and loved
jazz -- both had roots reaching back to Kansas and had
families of mixed races -- and the black writer took an interest in
Obama.
"Our grandfather ... thought (Frank) was a point of connection, a bridge
if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother,"
Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, said during a recent interview.
For Obama, Davis was an intriguing figure, "with his books and whiskey
breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes."
Dunham and his grandson would spend evenings at Davis's dilapidated home
in Waikiki, Honolulu's main tourist district. Davis, who had
raised a family with a white wife, would read his poetry and share
whiskey with Dunham, Obama recalled.
Dawna Weatherly-Williams, a friend of Davis' who also lives in Honolulu,
said Dunham wanted Obama to know that there were other children like him
who were part black and part white, she said.
"Stan was real proud of that," she said, adding that it was rare to see
black men with white women at the time.
"He
knew Stan real well. They’d play Scrabble and drink and crack
jokes and argue. Frank always won and he was always very
braggadocio about it too. It was all jocular. They didn’t
get polluted drunk. And Frank never really did drugs, though he
and Stan would smoke pot together."
"Stan had been promising to bring Barry by because we all had that in
common. Frank’s kids were half-white, Stan’s grandson was
half-black and my son was half-black. We all had that in common
and we all really enjoyed it. We got a real kick out of reality."
Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, told the Associated Press recently
that her grandfather had seen Davis was "a point of connection, a bridge
if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother"
According to Miss Weatherly-Williams, Davis lost touch with Dunham some
time in the 1980s.
Obama describes driving to Davis' home in Waikiki after learning that
his white grandmother was so afraid of a black panhandler she did not
want to take the bus to work. Davis told the teenager that his
grandmother was correct to feel scared because she understood
African-Americans "have a reason to hate."
Davis said Obama's grandfather would never understand people like him
because they hadn't experienced the humiliations he had, according to
Obama's memoir. As he left Davis's house that night, Obama wrote, he
knew he was completely alone for the first time in his life.
Davis appears again later in the book, when Obama recalls meeting the
writer shortly before leaving for college on the mainland. At that
meeting, Davis scolded Obama for his listless attitude toward college
and warned him not to leave his race behind, which he called "the real
price of admission" to higher education.
"Leaving your race at the door. Leaving your people behind….
You're not going to college to get educated. You're going to get
trained…. They'll train you to forget what you already know.
They'll train you so good, you'll start believing what they tell you
about equal opportunity and the American way and all that s**t."
And then Frank pronounces the modern version of the one key concept
which the Democratic Party, under slavery, segregation, and civil
rights, has sought to ingrain in the mind of every black person: "You
may be a well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you're a nigger just the
same."
A few days later Obama left Hawaii for Occidental College
in Los Angeles.
Information from Davis's 601 page
FBI file
reveals that Davis (born 1905) became interested in the Communist
Party as far back as 1931.
Certainly from the mid/late '30s to the early '40s Davis was involved in
several Communist Party fronts including the the National Negro
Congress, the League of American Writers, the National Federation for
Constitutional Liberties and the Civil Rights Congress
The FBI first began tracking Davis in 1944 when they identified him as
member of the Communist Party's Dorie Miller Club in Chicago -- card
number 47544.
Davis taught courses at the party controlled Abraham Lincoln School in
Chicago and attended meetings of the party's Cultural Club until he left
for Hawaii in 1948.
In Hawaii Davis became a columnist for a union financed, communist
controlled newspaper, the Honolulu Record.
Despite going underground in 1950, the Hawaiian CP was one of the most
dynamic in the US at the time. The mainland put huge resources
into the Hawaiian party because the Soviets wanted the US military
presence on the islands shut down. The Hawaiian CP was charged
with agitating against the US military bases at every opportunity.
Several times the FBI observed Davis photographing obscure Hawaiian
beaches -- possibly for espionage purposes.
Through its control of the International Longshore Workers Union (ILWU)
the Hawaiian CP had huge influence on the local Democratic Party.
In the mid '50s, while still a confirmed communist, Davis like many of
his comrades, became an official in the local Democratic Party.
The communist influence is still felt in the Hawaiian democratic party
today.
At the time the underground CP was divided into two or three person
independent cells. Davis led one such cell "Group 10" with his
wife and one other comrade.
An extensive Senate Security Investigation in 1956 shattered the
Hawaiian CP, driving the remnants completely underground where it
remains to this day.
The FBI continued to monitor Davis into the '60s and though they found
little if any party activity on the islands, he was still regarded as a
"believer."
The FBI monitored Davis for at least 19 years. They marked him
down for immediate arrest should war break out between the US and the
Soviet Union -- an honor reserved only for the most dangerous
subversives.
One of the longest lived communist fronts was the American Committee for
Protection of Foreign Born. Active from 1935 until 1980, the
ACFPFB was charged with preventing foreign communists such Davis's
friend ILWU leader Harry Bridges from deportation.
Davis was a long time supporter of the ACFPFB, apparently at least until
1973, three years after meeting the young Obama.
The ACFPFB
letterhead April 12th 1973, contains Davis' name listed under
"Sponsors."
Interestingly, Hawaiian lawyer, party member and
long time Davis comrade Harriet Bouslog also appears on the list.
Others of the several known party members listed above include civil
rights activists Carl and Anne Braden, Dirk J Struik, a mathematician
and accused Soviet spy, whose daughter peace activist daughter Gwen
lives in New Zealand, Hugh DeLacy a secret party member who became a
Democratic Congressman for Washington State and three prominent Chicago
activists, Richard Criley, Frank Wilkinson and Abe Feinglass.
When Obama decided to go to Chicago in 1983 to become a "community
organizer" he was inspired by that year's election of Chicago's first
black mayor,
Harold Washington.
A long time friend of the Chicago Communist Party, Washington would have
almost certainly known Frank Marshall Davis from his post-War student
days.
It would be interesting to know if Frank Marshall Davis ever told the
young Obama about Harold Washington and his leftist connections.
What connection did Obama have to Chicago other than his boyhood mentor
Frank Marshall Davis?
Marxist
Professors
Obama entered Occidental College in
California in 1979.
In his first memoir,
"Dreams," Obama included a
description of black student life at
Occidental College in Los Angeles.
"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it
came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying
close together, traveling in packs," he wrote. "It remained
necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the
black masses, to strike out and name names."
He added: "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends
carefully. The more politically active black students. The
foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and
structural feminists."
You are know by your friends and
associates -- and Obama's are the hard-core leftists.
Marxist
Conferences
During Obama's Columbia period, he regularly attended the Marxist-Socialist conferences at
Cooper Union and African cultural
fairs in Brooklyn and started lecturing his relatives until they worried
he'd become "one of
those freaks you see on the streets around here."
He Is
Who He Is
He has made it clear that the mere use of His name would be freighted
with coded innuendoes of something too horrible to say
straightforwardly. One has to go back to Exodus 3:13-14 to find
such strict instructions concerning the use of a name. Moses
explained: "Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to
them, 'The God of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me,
'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?" And God said to Moses, "I
Am Who I Am." And He said, "Thus you shall say to the children of
Israel, 'I Am has sent me to you.'"
So perhaps we can call Him, for short, Sen. I Am (full code name: I Am
who you have been waiting for).
Obama is
scheduled to speak at a rally at the University of Mary Washington
today (UMW). The public is invited to this forum, on property it,
the public, owns. However, signs and banners will not be allowed,
according to the organizers and compliant campus officials.
Suddenly, UMW is a First Amendment-Free, or at least a First
Amendment-Crippled, Zone, subject to the self-serving preferences of
politicos. Why does an Obama rally justify taking a little off the
top of Americans’ most fundamental rights?
A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the
sign-and-banner ban. That campaign tells us that the ban is for
"security" reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service,
responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the
service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no "part of
the sign could be used as a weapon," e.g., a heavy metal pole or a
sharpened stick.
The McCain campaign tells us, "We encourage people to make signs at our
events."
1st
Amendment
Gov. Matt Blunt today
issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed
plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to
threaten and intimidate his critics.
"St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit
Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama
and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have
attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden
campaign."
"What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond
words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is
abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence
political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
"This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred
principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more
offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to
deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable
purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people
away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to
suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by
this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress
ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on
television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation
about the election.
"Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in
the press constantly say false things about me and my family.
Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the
purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri
law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent
of the Sedition Acts -- not a free society."
In
this letter, sent to TV stations from Obama campaign general counsel
Bob Bauer, the Obama campaign, once again, attempts to intimidate
television station managers from airing a
TV ad by the National Rifle Association.
Bauer argues, "Unlike federal candidates, independent political
organizations do not have a 'right to command the use of broadcast
facilities.' Moreover, you have a duty 'to protect the public from
false, misleading or deceptive advertising.' We request that you
immediately cease airing this advertising."
The Obama campaign takes issue with an ad called "Hunter," pointing out
that claims in the ad were called "false" by Factcheck.org, and were
given three Pinocchios by the Washington Post's "Factchecker."
In response, Cleta Mitchell, Counsel to the NRA, fired back in a letter
to station managers that the fact checkers in this case are wrong.
"We respectfully request that your station disregard the shamefully
false assertions from the Obama campaign and its attorneys," Mitchell
writes. You can read more of Mitchell's letter at the
blog of Ben Smith of Politico, who reprinted it in full.
Political speech is absolute. This is
another attempt by Obama's
NKVD to deny
Americans their 1st Amendment "free expression" rights.
As you read down the page you will see other instances of intimidation
by Obama's NKVD. This is obviously a formal tactic of his
campaign.
Just imagine what these people would do with the full force of the
Department of Justice behind them.
Obama's assault on free speech reminds me of how Islam deals with speech
it does not like: "Behead Those Who Insult The Prophet."
As an aside, the "lawyer letter" is on Obama
Campaign stationary. Obama's name in the letterhead is quite
large. One can hardly read Biden's name.
2nd
Amendment
Obama is
embracinganti-gun policies in the run-up to a Democratic
presidential debate scheduled on the one-year anniversary of the
Virginia Tech shootings.
"I am not in favor of concealed weapons," Obama told the Pittsburgh
Tribune. "I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more
innocent people could (get shot during) altercations."
These remarks break from Obama’s previous moderate rhetoric on gun
control.
While campaigning in Idaho in February, Obama promised, "I have no
intention of taking away folks’ guns."
Obama’s presidential campaign
has worked to assure uneasy gun owners that he believes the
Constitution protects their rights and that he doesn’t want to take away
their guns.
But before he became a national political figure, he sat on the board of
the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago-based foundation that doled out at least
nine grants totaling nearly $2.7 million to groups that advocated the
opposite positions.
The foundation funded legal scholarship advancing the theory that the
Second Amendment does not protect individual gun owners’ rights, as well
as two groups that advocated handgun bans. And it paid to
support a book called "Every Handgun Is Aimed at You:
The Case
for Banning Handguns."
2nd
Amendment
On the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (01:28)
2nd
Amendment
Obama's proposal to
ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school.
"Barack Obama supported a proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a
school or park, which would eliminate almost every gun store in
America." is more than just a little exaggeration.
2nd
Amendment
Barack Obama voted four times to allow criminal charges against
homeowners who defend their person and home with a gun.
Despite Obama's propensity to say and do anything to get elected,
Obama's record does not match his rhetoric.
In fact, Barack Obama specifically
voted four times
in the Illinois Legislature to allow criminal charges against a
homeowner who used a firearm in self-defense of their person and home --
specifically what the Supreme Court says is a constitutional right.
Obama may say he supports it, but his record says exactly the opposite.
"I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear
arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that
the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that
right."
Here's a few examples -- make up your own:
"Just because you have an individual right [to free speech] does not
mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of
that right."
"Just because you have an individual right [not to be searched
unreasonably] does not mean that the state or local government can't
constrain the exercise of that right."
"Just because you have an individual right [to freely exercise religion]
does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the
exercise of that right."
"Just because you have an individual right [to an abortion] does not
mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of
that right."
"Just because you have an individual right [to bear arms] does not mean
that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that
right."
Does anyone else find this disturbing?
2nd
Amendment
"One of the most blatant lies ever to come from a
politician's mouth," is how the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) is
characterizing a recent statement by U.S. Senator Barack Obama.
Speaking in the latest issue of "Field & Stream," Obama claims that
Illinois sportsmen know him as an advocate for their rights. On the
contrary, Obama's voting record while a state senator clearly indicates
that he has nothing but contempt for the law-abiding firearm owner.
"Any sportsman who counts Barack Obama as one of his friends is
seriously confused," said ISRA Executive Director Richard Pearson.
"Throughout his tenure in the Illinois Senate, Obama served as one of
the most loyal foot soldiers in Mayor Daley's campaign to abolish
civilian firearm ownership. While a state senator, Obama voted for
legislation that would ban and forcibly confiscate nearly every shotgun,
target rifle and hunting rifle in the state. Obama also voted for
bills that would ration the number of firearms a law-abiding citizen
could own, yet give a pass to the violent thugs who roam our streets.
And, inexplicably, Obama voted four times against legislation that would
allow citizens to use firearms to defend their homes and families."
"Let us also not forget that Obama served as a director of the Joyce
Foundation," continued Pearson. "While on the Joyce Foundation
board, Obama funneled tens of millions of dollars to radical gun control
organizations such as the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence and
the Violence Policy Center."
"If Senator Obama considers his legislative record and his philanthropic
endeavors to be acts of advocacy on behalf of sportsmen's rights, then I
submit that the Senator is seriously confused as well," asserted
Pearson.
"Nobody knows Obama's record on guns better than I do, and it's rotten
to the core," said Pearson. "I've been involved in Illinois
politics nearly as long as Obama has been alive. In that time, I
have never encountered a legislator who was more hostile towards or more
disinterested in sportsmen's rights than Barack Obama."
While a state
senator, Obama
voted for legislation that would ban and forcibly confiscate nearly
every shotgun, target rifle and hunting rifle in the state. Obama also
voted for bills that would ration the number of firearms a law-abiding
citizen could own, yet give a pass to the violent thugs who roam our
streets. And, inexplicably, Obama voted four times against
legislation that would allow citizens to use firearms to defend their
homes and families.
Abortion
The entire
issue of abortion involves determining when a baby becomes a person.
If Obama thinks this is above his pay grade, then he probably shouldn’t
be running for political office. If a baby is a person at
conception, then abortion is murder. If Obama doesn’t believe that
abortion is murder, then he can’t believe in the personhood, the
humanity, of an embryo or fetus -- not unless he’s some kind of monster.
Obama side-stepped a pointed
query about abortion on Saturday by "mega-pastor" Rick Warren during
a televised forum.
Asked at what point a baby gets "human rights," Obama, who strongly
supports abortion rights, said: "… whether you’re looking at it from a
theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that
question with specificity … is above my pay grade."
As President -- even as Senator -- Obama is expected to have an answer
for this. Quite literally, there is no higher pay grade in the US
government, and abortion is one of the issues he has to face. If
he can’t face it, then he should go back to community organization and
leave politics for people who can. John McCain had no trouble
answering the same question. Obama dodged it -- and for good
reason: his answer would have exposed his radical views.
Abortion
Almost one year has passed since Obama made his vow to the Planned
Parenthood Action Fund that abortion would be the first priority of
his administration.
"The first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act,"
Obama
said in his July, 2007, speech to abortion advocates worried
about the increase of pro-life legislation at the state level.
The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) is legislation Obama has co-sponsored
along with 18 other senators that would annihilate every single state
law limiting or regulating abortion, including the federal ban on
partial birth abortion.
Abortion
Barack Obama is the most pro-abortion presidential candidate ever.
He is so pro-abortion that he refused as an Illinois state senator to
support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions
because he did not want to concede -- as he explained in a cold-blooded
speech on the Illinois Senate floor -- that these babies, fully outside
their mothers' wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were
in fact "persons."
The Illinois bill that Obama refused to support had language identical
to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act that passed the U.S. Senate
98-0, with such senators as Barbara Boxer voting in favor.
But
who cares about such stuff when gas is over four bucks a gallon?
Not Donna Brazile or the MSM, apparently.
Abortion
Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide.
Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting
"present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or
BAIPA.
10. Babies who survive abortions are not protected by the Equal
Protection Clause of the Constitution.
Obama, the sole opponent ever to speak against BAIPA, stated on
the Illinois Senate floor on March 30, 2001:
"I just want to suggest ... that this is probably not going to survive
constitutional scrutiny."
"Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is
protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the
Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are
persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be
provided to a -- child, a 9-month-old -- child that was delivered to
term. …"
"I mean, it -- it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal
protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this
is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute. For that
purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional."
Read the other 9 reasons for supporting infanticide
here.
Abortion
The Christian Defense Coalition is
launching a new campaign focused on painting Obama, who received a
100% rating from NARAL in 2005,2006 and 2007, as "The Abortion
President."
Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition,
says Obama would have "the most extremist policies on abortion of any
President in history. Senator Obama's views on abortion are so
radical that he even wants American citizens to pay for them. This
would include Catholics, Evangelicals and all people of faith. He
would also expand abortion rights through his passionate support of The
Freedom of Choice Act."
ACLU
The ACLU scores the entire Senate and House every year based on the
issues they think most important. Obama didn’t beat his VP pick
Joe Biden’s 91%, but he didn’t do bad for a first term Senator with an
82% lifetime score. If he would have actually vote more than just
"present" his score would be higher. The only issue he voted
against that the ACLU wanted him to vote for was the FISA Amendments Act
of 2008 in which he had to do some pandering.
Affirmative
Action
April 29th -- Obama says, "I
still believe in affirmative action as a means of overcoming
both historic and potentially current discrimination ..."
And what is "potentially current
discrimination?"
Alinsky
Obama answered a help-wanted ad for a position as a community organizer
for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community
Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago. Obama was 24 years
old, unmarried, and according to his memoir, searching for a genuine
African-American community.
Both the CCRC and the DCP were built on the Alinsky model of community
agitation, wherein paid organizers learned how to "rub raw the sores of
discontent," in Alinsky's words.
One of Obama's early mentors in the Alinsky method was Mike Kruglik, who
had
this to say to an interviewer of The New Republic, about Obama:
"He was a natural, the undisputed master of
agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a
rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not
living up to their own standards. As with the panhandler, he could be
aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal
questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing
down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they
could make things better."
The agitator's job, according to Alinsky, is first to bring folks to the
"realization" that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the
fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them
to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an
almighty stink that the dastardly governments and corporations
will see imminent "self-interest" in granting whatever it is that will
cause the harassment to cease.
In these methods, euphemistically labeled "community organizing," Obama
had a four-year education, which he often says was the best education he
ever got anywhere.
Alinsky
Process
In order to stop the "bitter" bleeding caused by Obama's
"bitter, bibles and guns," remark, Obama
responded to the Pennsylvania gaff with the following
I found this video very illuminating, as it demonstrates Obama employing the
Alinsky agitation technique of "rubbing raw the sores of discontent." (Alinsky's
words)
Watch as Obama sets up a list of grievances, gets everyone angry and then
leads the choir in an emotional response to Washington's failures -- "they
(Americans) can't count on Washington" -- and ends strong -- he's the answer
to everything he says is wrong with America.
The entire exercise was to change the discussion. Obama never addressed
his condescending remarks. Instead, he got his audience mad at Washington
-- he changed the subject.
Note the
difference between what Obama said in his unguarded moment at San
Francisco's "Billionair's Row," and the cleaned-up version he tried to sell
tonight.
At the Getty Mansion (see picture below -- 4/6/2008):
"So it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment
or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
With "the folks" in Indiana:
"So people end up voting on issues like guns and are they going to have the
right to bear arms. They vote on issues like gay marriage. They take refuge in
their faith and their community, and their family, and the things they can count
on."
Alinsky
On
Alinsky
All the elements were
present: the individual stories told by real people of their
situations and hardships, the packed-to-the rafters crowd, the crowd's
chanting of key phrases and names, the action on the spot of texting and
phoning to show instant support and commitment to jump into the
political battle, the rallying selections of music, the setting of the
agenda by the power people. The Democratic National Convention had
all the elements of the perfectly organized event, Saul Alinsky style.
Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is
showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and
the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get
the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and
thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making
it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.
I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied
successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic
campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we
approach his 100th birthday.
L. DAVID ALINSKY
Medfield
Alinksy
Community
Organizing
Obama goes
to work at a Chicago housing project, Altgeld Gardens, where he refines
his skills.
Here, Obama worked as an
ethnic activist, helping the
impoverished black community wring more money and services from the
government. That government money was wrecking the morals of the
housing-project residents seems obvious from his book, but Obama never
comes out and says it. Numerous white moderates assume that a man
of Obama’s superlative intelligence must be kidding when he espouses his
cast-iron liberalism on race-related policies, but they don’t understand
the emotional imperative of racial loyalty to him.
His mentor during this period was the veteran local agitator, Hazel
Johnson, who who
disputes the version of events at
Altgeld Gardens that Obama wrote of in his book and tells audiences at
his political gatherings.
While working as a community organizer, Obama was repeatedly asked to
join Christian congregations but
begged off.
"I remained a reluctant skeptic, doubtful of my own motives ..." he
wrote.
Alinsky
And
Power
Using donations for the poor to help power-seeking
politicians attain their ends is pure Alinskyism. One of
Obama’s Chicago mentors, Gregory Galluzzo -- a former Jesuit priest, now
married and Executive Director of the Gamaliel community organizing
network -- was interviewed by a writer to whom he showed the training
manual he uses with new organizers.
"Galluzzo told me that many new trainees have an aversion to Alinsky’s
gritty approach because they come to organizing as idealists rather than
realists. But Galluzzo’s manual instructs them to get over these
hang-ups. 'We are not virtuous by not wanting power,' it says.
'We are really cowards for not wanting power,' because 'power is good'
and 'powerlessness is evil.'"
Alinksy
'We don't care about the world as it is, we imagine
the world
as it might be. We want to write
a new chapter,'" Obama told the crowd. "That is the moment that we
are in right now."
Arrogance
In his pre-campaign book, "The Audacity of Hope," Barack Obama
proclaims, "I find comfort in the fact that the longer I'm in politics
the less nourishing popularity becomes, that a striving for rank and
fame seems to betray a poverty of ambition, and that I am answerable
mainly to the steady gaze of my own conscience."
Some might think this odd testimony from a young and inexperienced
freshman senator on the cusp of seeking the highest rank, and the most
famous position, in the world. It's a bit like a parish priest
saying he's happy with his modest lot in life and then declaring he's
throwing his hat in the ring to become pope.
But a closer reading reveals a possible explanation. Perhaps he's
an adulation junkie. Maybe the diminishing "nourishment" Sen.
Obama receives from "popularity" is actually causing him to ratchet up
his pursuit of more and more praise just to get the minimal fix he
needs.
That would account for why a man who thinks striving for popularity is a
character flaw has nonetheless decided to give his nomination acceptance
speech in a 76,000-seat football stadium.
Or it might tell us why a candidate who hasn't even been nominated yet
wants to re-enact some of the most famous scenes from both Reagan and
JFK's highlight reels by holding a rally at Germany's Brandenburg Gate,
even though he's not a head of state yet. (German authorities,
aware of Obama's rock-star status with the German public, diplomatically
suggested that it was up to Obama to decide what is in "good taste.")
Perhaps Dominic Lawson, writing in the British newspaper The Independent
had it right when he recently wrote that Obama is "a man of stunning
articulacy, but also stunning self-regard."
Obama has surrounded himself with racists, socialists, Marxists,
communists, domestic terrorists and accused felons, yet has an uncanny
ability to mesmerize the mainstream media into believing the people with
whom he associates in the long term do not reflect upon him personally.
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I
had learned: People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and
smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied, they
were relieved -- such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young
black man who didn’t seem angry all the time."
That is a quote from Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father. He has
learned to play the game well. Regardless of the company he keeps,
his smiling well mannered persona has indeed been an effective shield
into the psyche of Barack Obama.
Associates
Barack Obama, measured by his chosen life experiences, closest
associations, voting record, and pre-presidential campaign utterances,
is, in personality and experience, the least qualified, and, in
philosophy and program, most radically left candidate ever offered for
the presidency by the Democratic Party. By comparison, George
McGovern, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Al Gore and John Kerry seem
the very embodiment of presidential readiness and political moderation.
And all this is occurring while the Democrats control both House and
Senate by margins that will increase in November and at a time in
history when the continued existence of Western Civilization is in
serious question.
Tennessee Democratic Party Executive Committee member
Fred Hobbs
tells The City newspaper in Nashville, "I don't exactly approve of a lot
of the things he stands for -- and I'm not sure we know enough about
him. He's got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist
connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be."
Associates
In a new afterword to his 2001 book, Bill Ayers, former
leader of the 1960s radical group Weather Underground,
describes President-elect Barack Obama as a "family
friend" and denies he wished his group had set off more bombs in the
1960s.
Ayers, a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, adds few
new details about his relationship with Obama in the afterword to
Fugitive Days: Memoirs of an Anti-War Activist. The book is being
reissued this month.
"We had served together on the board of a foundation, knew one another
as neighbors and family friends, held an initial fund-raiser at my
house, where I’d made a small donation to his earliest political
campaign," he writes.
With the 1960s over, his more radical days are behind him, he writes.
Nowadays, "I go about my business, hang out with my wife and our kids
and grandchildren, take care of the elders, go to work, teach, and
write," the afterword states. "I also organize and participate in
the never-ending effort to build a powerful movement for peace and
social justice." (code words for communism)
Bitter
Obama came
under fire today for saying small-town Pennsylvania residents were
"bitter" and "cling to guns or religion," in comments his rivals said
showed an elitist view of the middle class.
"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a
lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25
years and nothing's replaced them." Obama said.
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to
guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or
anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain
their frustrations." he said.
What makes this so
breathtaking is the mindless, casual way in which Obama reveals his
snobbishness and elitism. We saw hints of this from
Michelle Obama, in her assertions about never being proud of her country
until her husband ran for President. We had not seen it from Obama
himself in such a blatant and unmistakable manner. The
matter-of-fact style in which he spoke this shows the unthinking
contempt he has for people he has never engaged -- an acceptance of
stereotypes without questioning them that shows his own bigotry, not to
mention foolishness and poor judgment.
Obama explained that
simple rural folks and other proletarians would abandon their unpleasant
devotion to firearms and religion if only the Executive Branch of the
Federal Government would preserve their factory jobs. If Obama
sounds familiar here, he should. His comments have a proud pedigree.
"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a
heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It
is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as
the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real
happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their
condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires
illusions."
That is Karl Marx in Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, 1843.
Obama is saying exactly the same thing as Marx. They each argue
religion exists because the life of a proletarian worker is frustrating
and unsatisfying. Both Obama and Marx argue that the proletarians
cling to religion, not for its own sake, but because the economic system
is not satisfying their social needs. To Marx’s evaluation of
religion, Obama adds firearms and other aspects of rural life in America
that progressives don’t approve of.
This isn’t a mistake. This isn’t a misquote. This is another
insight into how Obama thinks. The comments that he and his wife
make reveal their "progressive" world view. It is socialist, it is
fascist and it is obvious. All you have to do is listen.
"[T]hey cling to guns…" Cling to guns? Americans have "clung" to
guns since the founding of the Republic. It’s such a core value to
this nation that its founders placed it second on the Bill of Rights,
right after freedom of speech and religion. Speaking of which …
"or [they cling to] religion …" People don’t become religious
because the economy hits a few bumps in the road. Obama may have
chosen his religion based on politics, but most people follow a religion
out of a deeper sense of spirituality. I can’t think of a more
condescending and contemptuous analysis of religious dedication than
this statement.
"or [they cling to] antipathy to people who aren’t like them or
anti-immigrant sentiment…" Small-town voters are bigots and
xenophobes; there’s no other way to read the first part of this
statement. The second part, about them being "anti-immigrant," is
a non-sequitur. They may be anti-illegal immigrant, but that’s a
far different issue. Obama offers no proof that small-town voters
are xenophobes, but the Frisco audience didn’t demand any, either.
It’s part of their own bigotry that makes them see middle America in
those terms.
"or [they cling to] anti-trade sentiment …" And this is just jaw-droppingly
hypocritical. This comes from the same candidate who opposes the
Colombian free-trade agreement and wants to throw NAFTA out the window.
Who’s clinging to anti-trade sentiment? Obama, Hillary Clinton,
and Big Labor.
It would be difficult to be any more condescending or insulting in so
many ways to so many voters in a single sentence. It reveals a
deeply elitist and shockingly callow candidate. It’s the "Let them
eat cake" of 2008.
Bitter Too
At North Carolina's Wesleyan College in Rocky Mount, N.C., Clinton
campaign North Carolina chieftain Tom Hendrickson, a former state party
chair,
made much hay out of the "small town" comments made by Sen. Barack
Obama, D-Ill.
"I normally just come and talk about President Clinton and Senator
Clinton at these, but today Senator Obama was out at a fundraiser at I
guess a brie and chardonnay crowd in San Francisco," Hendrickson said.
"But his quote talking about small towns in Pennsylvania -- and which
applies to small towns across eastern North Carolina -- which is why it
is relevant to this tour we are doing today. And his quote is 'and
it is not surprising that they cling to guns and religion or antipathy
to people who aren't like them, or anti-immigrant or anti-trade as a way
to explain their frustration.'"
"I listened to that quote and I got mad," Hendrickson said, "and
I wanted to reach out to Senator Obama and say senator, we are from the
rural part of eastern North Carolina. We are very proud of our
heritage, we are proud of who we are. We are not frustrated.
We are not bitter. We turn to our faith because we believe, and we
hunt and fish because it is part of our culture and we enjoy it."
Capitalism
Obama described capitalism as "chaotic and unforgiving," and says he
had a desire to roll back the "ownership society." ("The Audacity of
Hope") [271]
Change
Most Americans revile socialism, yet Obama's poll
numbers remain competitive. One explanation: He's a longtime
disciple of a man whose mission was to teach radicals to disguise their
ideology.
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee's choice of the word
"change" as his campaign's central slogan is not the product of
focus-group studies, or the brainstorming sessions of his political
consultants.
One of Obama's main inspirations was a man dedicated to revolutionary
change that he was convinced "must be preceded by a passive,
affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of
our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so
futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of
the past and change the future."
Saul Alinsky had no time for liberalism or liberals, declaring that "a
liberal is (someone) who puts his foot down firmly on thin air."
He wanted nothing less than transformational radicalism. "America
was begun by its radicals," he wrote. "America was built by its
radicals. The hope and future of America lies with its radicals."
And so, "This is the job for today's radical -- to fan the embers of
hopelessness into a flame to fight. To say, '. . . let us change
it together!' "
Obama called his years as an Alinskyesque community organizer in Chicago
"the best education I ever had."
Alinsky believed in sacrificing ethics and morals for the great cause.
"Ethical standards must be elastic to stretch with the times," Alinsky
wrote in his last book, "Rules for Radicals," adding that "all values
are relative in a world of political relativity."
Published a year before Alinsky's death in 1972, "Rules for Radicals"
includes a dedication in which he gives "an over-the-shoulder
acknowledgment to the very first radical . . . who rebelled against the
establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own
kingdom -- Lucifer."
Yup, Obama isn't done with his personal fable.
He's got
another novel on the way.
You’ll never guess the what the title is.
"Change We Can Believe In: Barack Obama’s Plan to Renew America’s
Promise" is a recycled collection of talking points and speeches.
It attempts to explain all the gaffes and lies he's uttered over the
past year.
Barack Obama’s plan to renew America -- yeah!
In the image of Karl Marx.
Change
At a campaign event at Mack's Apple's orchard in
Londonderry, NH, Obama
vowed to "change the world."
"I want you to believe," said the candidate, clad in an open-necked
shirt and barn jacket. "Not so much believe just in me but believe
in yourselves. Believe in the future. Believe in the future
we can build together. I'm confident together we can't fail."
There was a carnival atmosphere among the crowd of some 4,000, who
almost drowned Obama out as he reached his crescendo and said: "I
promise you. We won't just win New Hampshire. We will win
this election and, you and I together, we're going to change the
country and change the world."
And where did Obama get
this line? -- from his sensei , Alisky.
Comparable
Worth
Obama endorses "comparable worth," a truly bad idea.
In case you don't know what comparable worth is, it's an idea concocted
by feminists in the 1970s or early 1980s. They said that jobs typically
held by women pay less than jobs typically held by men.
To eliminate this inequity, somebody–the courts, maybe, or some
administrative agency, presumably with appeals to the courts–should
decide what those jobs were really worth, based on some sort of
convoluted criteria. So that it could be possible to prove that
secretaries were of comparable worth to truck drivers and should be paid
the same wages.
Comparable worth would subject the private-sector economy to the
equivalent of the federal civil service system. Bureaucrats would have
to classify every job, with their classifications subject to
administrative and judicial review.
Cover-Up
U.S. Congressman Eni Faleomavaega (D --
American Samoa)
was in Jakarta, Indonesia, where had a private meeting
in Jakarta with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and
Barnabas Suebu the governor for the Indonesian province of Papau. In the
meeting, Faleomavaega asked to travel to Obama's childhood school.
According to our Indonesian sources, "officials" who accompanied
Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or
photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America's "national archives"
and they were offering cash, lots of it. In a show of faith, Barack
Obama's childhood school would be one of the very first beneficiaries of
this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and
for the purchase of computer equipment, thanks in part to the
benevolence of this visiting junket.
The challenge of course was securing Indonesian government records
potentially damaging to Barack Obama's candidacy for the U. S.
presidency as well as other records pertaining to a young Barry Soetoro
and his family wouldn't be so easy to acquire and secure, and for this,
the visitors would need the assistance and cooperation of the Indonesian
government.
Calling for a new direction when it comes to Cuba, Obama today said
as president he would allow unlimited family travel and remittances to
the island.
"It's time for more than tough talk that never yields
results. It’s time for a new strategy," he said. "It's time to let
Cuban Americans see their mothers and fathers, their sisters and
brothers. It’s time to let Cuban American money make their
families less dependent upon the Castro regime."
Obama on Cuba (01:37
Defense
So, today he says, ""Earning trust means listening to advice
from military people, including top uniformed leaders."
But before the long weekend began, Obama reaffirmed his long-expressed
intention to abandon Iraq by saying, "I am absolutely committed to ending
the war." I will call
my Joint Chiefs of Staff in and give them a new assignment and that is
to end the war."
So much for listening, but check this out.
The Joint Chiefs are not part of the chain of command. Indeed,
they are specifically by statute not part of the chain of command but
instead serve solely in an advisory capacity to the president.
Surely Obama knows this. Obviously he wouldn’t be seeking the role
of Commander-in-Chief without knowing how the job is done. So what
follows will be familiar to him, but may be enlightening to the media
types who to date have overlooked yet another Obama misstatement.
In 1986, the Goldwater-Nichols act passed congress, and it reorganized
the way the military functions. The Joint Chiefs would have
a representative from each of the services that could advise the
president of their individual service’s insights, but they were
specifically cut out of the command loop so that the
Schwarzkopf-type could run things efficiently.
So what is to become of our poor President Obama, barking out orders to
his Joint Chiefs only to learn that they don’t carry out orders but just
give advice? Will he claim he is powerless to end the war?
Or will he eventually figure out that he has to get Odierno or Gates or
Petraeus on the phone to make his wishes known?
And what are we to think of our Candidate Obama? As he’s been
running for office for 18 months now, shouldn’t he have found some time
to explore the way the president interacts with the military rather than
repeat canned (not to mention erroneous) assumptions he’s probably held
since his community organizing days?
In
remarks that clearly pointed toward the restoration of the military
draft under an Obama administration, the Democratic candidate said
Thursday night that his job as president would include demanding that
the American people recognize an "obligation" for military service. "If
we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some," Senator Barack
Obama declared.
Defense
The construction of a US missile shield in Europe
has been thrown into doubt after Poland said that President-Elect
Barack Obama had failed to commit himself to the project.
Officials in Warsaw said that after a conversation between President
Lech Kaczynski and Obama, they believe that the chances of the
controversial project going ahead now stood at no more than "over 50 per
cent".
Radek Sikorski, the foreign minister, also conceded that the worsening
state of the American economy might force the president elect to ditch,
or at least delay the program, in favor of domestic priorities (reparations
before defense).
Poland and the US committed themselves to the project on paper in August
in the wake of Russia's military intervention in Georgia. A
cornerstone of the of the defense strategy of President George W. Bush
and designed to protect the West from attack by "rogue states" such as
Iran, the shield would see Poland host ten interceptor missiles and the
Czech Republic host the radar component of a system.
Any delay would delight a resurgent Russia, which has described the plan
as an affront to its national security and has threatened to place
missiles near Poland in retaliation.
Denis McDonough, a foreign policy adviser to Obama, said that during the
phone call Obama had reiterated his long-standing position supporting
the deployment of the missile shield but only when the "technology is
proved to be workable."
Of course, the system will never be "workable"
because Obama has promised to end defense spending and development.
(video)
Defense
When
asked how they feel about President-elect Barack Obama as commander
in chief, six out of 10 active-duty service members say they are
uncertain or pessimistic, according to a Military Times survey.
In follow-up interviews,
respondents expressed concerns about Obama's lack of military service
and experience leading men and women in uniform.
''Being that the Marine Corps can be sent anywhere in the world with the
snap of his fingers, nobody has confidence in this guy as commander in
chief," said one lance corporal who asked not to be identified.
Distractions
March 28th -- It's All a Distraction! (Posted: Brian Faughnan on March 28, 2008 02:25 PM)
Obama on Jeremiah Wright:
Part of what I hope to do in this campaign and as president is to get
us beyond these divisions that distract us from our common
challenges and our common opportunities and move the country forward.
On going to war in Iraq:
What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove
to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the
poverty rate, a drop in the median income -- to distract us from
corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the
worst month since the Great Depression.
Obama on attacks by Hillary:
We knew that the closer we got to the change we seek, the more we'd
see of the politics we're trying to end -- the attacks and distortions
that try to distract us from the issues that matter to people's
lives, the stunts and the tactics that ask us to fear instead of hope.
On gay marriage:
The heightened focus on marriage is a distraction from other,
attainable measures to prevent discrimination and gays and lesbians.
Obama on race, gay marriage, abortion, and illegal immigration:
We get distracted from solving problems such as health care,
employment or the environment because of these divisions. It
happens in every election, and it's not just race. It's
immigration, gay people or abortion. There's always one of these
issues that crops up and prevents us from focusing on vital issues that
this country's long-term well-being depends on us solving.
It's not all that original to note that much of Obama's rhetoric is
pretty vague -- often vapid. But I've begun to notice how many
things Obama regards as distractions. When he labels a given issue
a 'distraction,' he's saying that someone is whipping up a an issue from
whole cloth simply for political gain.
So who does he think is being insincere: gays who want to marry, or
people of faith who think marriage is for a man and a woman? How
about in the competition between border enforcement advocates and those
who want amnesty for illegal aliens? Or between those who favor
abortion on demand, and those who believe life begins at conception?
All of these are important public policy questions, with divisions among
Americans that prevent easy solutions. Obama shouldn't denigrate
broad swaths of the population just because it would be difficult to
address their concerns.
Distractions
Inauguration Day is more than a month away and Obama can add the Blago
scandal to all the other "distractions" he has to deal with.
Obama is surrounded by more scandals than Nixon, Clinton and a dozen
other corrupt politicians combined and he's not even in office
yet, and these things aren't going to go way.
He will be so busy playing "cover-your-ass," he will be unable to
govern. His entire administration will be on damage control from
day one, and eventually, this will all crumble around him.
Affirmative action is a wonderful thing.
* Distraction -- Obama's term for
allegations of wrongdoing by himself and/or his close associates.
Economy
A
Billion Here
A
Billion There
Obama unveiled much of his
economic strategy in Wisconsin this week: He wants to spend $150
billion on a green-energy plan. He wants to establish an
infrastructure investment bank to the tune of $60 billion. He
wants to expand health insurance by roughly $65 billion. He wants
to "reopen" trade deals, which is another way of saying he wants to
raise the barriers to free trade.
He intends to regulate the profits for drug companies, health insurers,
and energy firms. He wants to establish a mortgage-interest tax
credit. He wants to double the number of workers receiving the
earned income tax credit, the EITC, and triple the EITC benefit for
minimum-wage workers. The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around
$800 billion. And tax hikes on the rich won’t pay for it.
It’s the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden
in terms of higher taxes and lower growth.
This isn’t free enterprise. It’s old-fashioned-liberal tax, and
spend, and regulate. It’s plain ol’ big government. The only
people who will benefit are the central planners in Washington.
The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Mr. Obama’s
tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6% personal income tax, a
52.2% combined income and payroll tax, a 28% capital-gains tax, a 39.6%
dividends tax, and a 55% estate tax.
Not only is Mr. Obama the big-spending candidate, he’s also the
very-high-tax candidate. And what he wants to tax is capital.
Obama doesn't understand the vital role of capital formation in creating
businesses and jobs. He doesn't understand that without capital,
businesses can’t expand their operations and hire more workers?
Economy
Obama's 'emergency' economic plan -- raiding corporate
America
On Friday, Obama
announced
an "Emergency Economic Plan" that would give families a stimulus check
of $1,000 each, funded in part by what his presidential campaign calls
"windfall profits from Big Oil."
The first part of Obama’s plan is an emergency energy rebate ($500 to
individual workers, $1,000 to families) as soon as this fall.
Separately, Obama’s plan includes a $50 billion stimulus package that
his campaign claims would save more than 1 million jobs, with half of
the money going to state governments.
Obama announced his plan for a windfall profits tax on oil companies on
June 9 in Raleigh, N.C., as he launched a two-week economic tour after
clinching the Democratic nomination.
Friday’s proposal says Obama "is proposing to offset the cost of his
emergency energy rebates over the next five years by enacting a windfall
profits tax on big oil companies."
The windfall-profits tax tried by Jimmy Carter resulted in decreased
domestic production and forced us to import more oil -- it did nothing
to relieve weary consumers.
The Congressional Research Service analyzed the Carter-era
windfall-profits tax and called it a complete failure.
Economy
On the first day of what is to be a two-week economic tour around
the country, Barack Obama said Monday that lawmakers should inject
another $50 billion immediately into the sluggish U.S. economy.
"Such relief can't wait until the next president takes office. ...
That's why I've called for another round of fiscal stimulus,
an immediate $50 billion to help those who've been hit hardest by
this economic downturn," Obama told a crowd in Raleigh, N.C.
And he's going to take it from you to give it
to them -- it's what socialists do.
Economy
Do you think the recent stock market
collapse or troubles in the banking system are good news?
Well, according to CNN's Candy Crowley, the Obama campaign does.
On Monday's "Anderson Cooper 360," after CNN senior political analyst
David Gergen said "what happened over the weekend with the economy and
the bottom falling out of the financial markets...is the opportunity for
Obama to seize the momentum back on his side," Crowley actually said, "[J]ust
as foreclosures were showing up on B-17, or in the real estate section,
along comes this horrific headline out of Wall Street...I mean, this
is what they wanted."
I kid you not. The transcript of this disgraceful exchange follows
(video embedded right, at link)
"As I said before, I think that one of the things we have to determine
is how we can be most helpful. It’s my sense that the most helpful thing
we can do right now is, uh, to let everyone know this is a sufficiently
important problem. I can be helpful, and I am prepared to be anywhere,
anytime. So, uh, I think the message is, if I can be helpful, I am
prepared to be there at any point."
Bear in mind that Senator Obama wants to run the executive branch
starting in January. At a moment when his country needs leadership and
Congress is meeting to determine policy that will affect the executive
branch for the next several months and years, he doesn’t consider his
role as a Senator important enough to take part in those negotiations.
"If I can be helpful," Obama says, indicating that he doesn’t consider
fulfilling his current responsibilities helpful or even desirable.
Energy
When Obama
told a Pennsylvania audience this past weekend that, "We can't drill
our way out of this," he was repeating the same line that Nancy Pelosi
used days earlier and that Harry Reid used on Wednesday.
The "Big Three" Dhimmicrats all agreed, they're against a Republican
proposal to lift a ban on oil drilling off the Florida coast, saying it
would take at least 10 years for that to offer motorists relief at the
pump -- the same argument dhimmicrats have been making for 20 or 30
years.
That's what they said during the Clinton Administration, and the Carter
Administration before that.
Obama is against every available option -- exploration, drilling,
refineries, clean coal and nuclear. His alternative? -- "clean
energy" -- which is also 10 years away.
If Clinton and his allies in Congress hadn't used this same excuse to
block drilling in ANWR in 1997, we'd be pumping oil there today.
Why are they so desperately opposed to exploiting our energy resources?
They have more nefarious goals and
this video
exposes them, the nationalization of the oil
industry.
If they can't tax the oil companies out of business, their alternate
goal is to seize the oil industry, just like their comrade, Hugo Chavez,
did in Venezuela.
There is no talk about where they’d get the trillions to buy out
stockholders, because they’re talking about outright theft -- the
seizure of the oil industry by the dhimmicratically controlled Congress.
Energy
Obama's Solution To The Drilling Debate: Inflate Your Tires
"We could save all the oil that they're talking about getting off
drilling if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular
tune-ups. You
could save just as much."
Obama is a lot like Sean Penn or George Clooney. If you give him a
script, he can deliver it pretty well. But if he tries to talk without a
script that has been written for him by others, he quickly reveals that
he is poorly-informed if not downright ignorant. Today he delivered
another classic, by claiming that if only we would all properly inflate
our tires, we could save as much gasoline as "all the oil that they're
talking about getting off drilling."
Obama's solution to the energy problem -- Hot Air! (00:22)
Update 8/4/08: Time
reports that McCain supporters in Michigan will distribute tire
gauges at Obama’s energy speech in Lansing, and that the RNC will also
deliver gauges reading "Obama’s Energy Plan" to Washington newsrooms.
Mary Katharine Ham may want to update her tribute to "Obama on your
shoulder" to include his helpful hint on the importance of tire gauges
and tune-ups.
Extremism
Senator Stealth: How to advance radical causes
when no one's looking
After hearing about Barack Obama's ties to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright,
Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Fr. Michael Pfleger, and the militant
activists of ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for
Reform Now), it should be clear to everyone that his extremist roots run
deep.
But the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has yet another
connection with the world of far-Left radicalism. Obama has long
been linked -- through foundation grants, shared political activism,
collaboration on legislation and tactics, and mutual praise and support
-- with the Chicago-based Gamaliel Foundation, one of the least known
yet most influential national umbrella groups for church-based
"community organizers."
The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so
boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama's pastor is shared, if more
quietly, by Obama's Gamaliel colleagues. The operative word here
is "quietly." Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and
Obama, a master student of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of
being a sub rosa radical himself. Obama's legislative tactics, as
well as his persistent professions of non-ideological pragmatism, appear
to be inspired by his radical mentors' most sophisticated tactics.
Not only has Obama studied, taught, and apparently absorbed stealth
techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and ACORN, but in his
position as a board member of Chicago's supposedly nonpartisan Woods
Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies -- at the very
moment he most needed their support to boost his political career.
It's high time for these shadowy, perhaps improper, ties to receive a
dose of sunlight.
The connections are numerous. Gregory Galluzzo, Gamaliel's co-founder
and executive director, served as a trainer and mentor during Obama's
mid-1980s organizing days in Chicago. The Developing Communities
Project, which first hired Obama, is part of the Gamaliel network.
Obama became a consultant and eventually a trainer of community
organizers for Gamaliel. (He also served as a trainer for ACORN.)
And he has kept up his ties with Gamaliel during his time in the U.S.
Senate.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac survived scrutiny by
manipulating, cajoling, and lobbying politicians and hiring board
members who were politicos (e.g. Jamie Gorelick) rather than mortgage
gurus. They hired lobbyists, gave massive donations, obtained nice
tax breaks, and sailed below the regulatory radar screen.
Of the 354 lawmakers who
received money from Freddie and Fannie between 1989 and 2008, Sen.
Chris Dodd received the most. But next was . . . drumroll .
. . Barack Obama. Yup. And he was only there for three
years.
Fascism
Obama believes he is above criticism and will act aggressively to
prevent stories and images, he and his supporters believe are
unflattering from being published. Obama has become a one-man
national censor.
A while back, Obama was all upset that his wife, Michelle, received fire
for her anti-American views, and
ordered the media and Republicans to "leave my wife alone" -- even
as the bride was out dissing the United States.
Two weeks ago, Dr. Danielle Allen, who failed to identify herself as an
Obama campaign worker and maximum financial contributor,
attacked me and a couple of others in the Washington Post for daring
to publish, on the Internet, opinion that she believes is unflattering
to Obama. She calls it calumny, the intentional and generally
vicious false accusation of a crime or other offense designed to damage
one's reputation. Acting as Obama's agent, she wants those she finds guilty of calumny to
be shunned and punished under the law.
Two days ago, Obama and his sycophants got their panties in a bunch over
the New Yorker cover page showing Obama dressed as a Somali elder (quite
true) and Michelle dressed as Angela Davis in the Oval Office, where
an American flag burns in the fireplace (image below).
Now, Obama's people are
crying "racism" that John McLaughlin used the term "oreo" in a
discussion of Jesse Jackson's threat to cut Obama's nuts off. Mind
you, McLaughlin never called or inferred Obama was an "oreo," or Jackson
either, but that didn't matter to the Obamalytes, because what Obama is
attempting to do is to silence any criticism or perceived criticism of
him, and by extension, his wife. CNN even reported that
McLaughlin's innocent comments caused an uproar -- what?
We all have watched as the left has portrayed the President of the
United States, George W. Bush with the most unbelievable, doctored
images. Search Google, using the word "Bush" and "Hitler,"
"chimp," "evil," or "murderer" to see what the Left has been up to for
the last 7 years.
George Bush, ever a man, simply ignored these vicious attacks.
Obama, on the other hand, whines like a child.
But it's worse. Obama has an agenda here. He and
his minions
want to silence any criticism of Obama -- anything that they see as
unflattering. They even stoop to identifying their critics as
racists -- which is really strange, since Obama, himself has displayed
his personal racism in his writings and spoken words for years.
Beware this guy. He truly has the instincts of a fascist.
Update: Obama
says the New Yorker cover was an insult to Muslim Americans.
"You know, there are wonderful Muslim Americans all across the country
who are doing wonderful things," the presidential candidate told CNN's
Larry King. "And for this to be used as sort of an insult, or to
raise suspicions about me, I think is unfortunate. And it's not
what America's all about."
Fascism
Obama's latest brainstorm -- "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the
national security objectives that we have set. We have got to have
a civilian national security force that is
just as
powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."
Someone should introduce this genius to the
National Guard.
Fascism
Obama general counsel Bob Bauer today
sent a second, sharper letter to the Justice Department, directly
attacking the Dallas billionaire funding an anti-Obama ad, Harold
Simmons.
"We reiterate our request that the Department of Justice fulfill its
commitment to take prompt action to investigate and to prosecute the
American Issues Project, and we further request that the Department of
Justice investigate and prosecute Howard (sic) Simmons for a knowing and
willful violation of the individual aggregate contribution limits,"
he wrote.
He called the group's activities "patently illegal."
Bauer made the case that Simmons' group isn't fulfilling its a real nonprofit
charter because it hasn't spent any money on anything other than
attacking Obama.
The American Issues Project released a statement responding to the
letter.
"Having failed in its attempts to get our legal, factual and
fully-supported ad off the air, Barack Obama's campaign now wants to put
our donors in prison for exercising their right to free speech," said Ed
Martin, the group's president. "These over-the-top bullying
tactics are reminiscent of the kind of censorship one would see in a
Stalinist dictatorship, with the only difference being that those guys
generally had to wait until they were in power to throw people who
disagreed with them into jail."
There must be something suspicious about Barack Obama's relationship
with unrepentant terrorist William Ayers that he doesn't want us to know
about.
He has sent out a team to threaten and silence an ad on this subject
that was developed by a legitimate and independent political
organization.
Now ask yourself this question, "just what is so damning about Obama's
relationship with William Ayers that he would threaten the free speech
of others to prevent it from airing?
Here's the real question, though: if Obama is
elected President, will he appoint an Attorney General who will
carry out politically-motivated prosecutions like the one he is now
demanding? I suppose we can't know for sure, but why wouldn't he?
If he demands criminal prosecution of free speech that opposes his
political interests when he's a candidate, why wouldn't he order it as
President?
Fascism
NewsBusters reports that the Obama Campaign tried to
shut down a Chicago radio show.
Members of Barack Obama’s campaign HQ in Chicago tried to shut down a
local radio show on the City's most powerful radio signal, WGN 720,
because they didn't like a conservative guest that was on going on the
air to discuss Senator Barack Obama's ties to local terrorist William
Ayers.
This is a shocking attempt at stifling political free speech and a bald
attempt to quash debate by the office of the Democratic Party's nominee.
The funny thing is, WGN is the most liberal station in the City with
every host but one slavishly supporting the junior Senator from
Illinois.
Show host Milt Rosenberg, the station's only conservative leaning host
(probably to be considered more libertarian than Republican), had on
short notice asked conservative writer Stanley Kurtz to come on the air
to discuss his work on uncovering Obama's ties to terrorist Wiliam Ayres
and the Annenberg Challenge project. Kurtz was just in Chicago for
his investigation and Rosenberg contacted Kurtz only that morning to
appear. At the same time, Rosenberg's producer contacted the Obama
campaign's HQ -- which is but blocks from the radio station in downtown
Chicago -- to offer some time on the air with Kurtz to debate Kurtz'
claims about Obama and Ayres. The campaign, however, flatly
refused the offer of the equal air time and instead tried to drum up via
email a protest of the show, trying to get it stopped.
The campaign
e-mailed Chicago supporters who had signed up for the Obama Action
Wire with detailed instructions including the station’s telephone number
and the show’s extension, as well as a research file on Kurtz, which
seems to prove that he’s a conservative, which isn’t in dispute.
The file cites a couple of his more controversial pieces, notably his
much-maligned claim that same-sex unions have undermined marriage in
Scandinavia.
"Tell WGN that by providing Kurtz with airtime, they are legitimizing
baseless attacks from a smear-merchant and lowering the standards of
political discourse," says the email, which picks up a form of pressure
on the press pioneered by conservative talk radio hosts and activists in
the 1990s, and since adopted by Media Matters and other liberal groups.
"It is absolutely unacceptable that WGN would give a slimy character
assassin like Kurtz time for his divisive, destructive ranting on our
public airwaves. At the very least, they should offer sane, honest
rebuttal to every one of Kurtz’s lies," it continues.
So let’s get this straight. Team Obama calls Kurtz all of these
names, and it’s Kurtz who’s the character assassin?
Fascism
Democratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden said
yesterday that he and running mate Barack Obama could
pursue criminal charges against the Bush administration if they are
elected in November.
Biden's comments, first reported by ABC news, attracted little notice on
a day dominated by the drama surrounding his Republican counterpart,
Alaska governor Sarah Palin.
But his statements represent the Democrats' strongest vow so far this
year to investigate alleged misdeeds committed during the Bush years.
"If there has been a basis upon which you can pursue someone for a
criminal violation, they will be pursued," Biden said during a campaign
event in Deerfield Beach, Florida, according to ABC.
"[N]ot out of vengeance, not out of retribution," he added, "out of the
need to preserve the notion that no one, no attorney general, no
president -- no one is above the law."
Obama sounded a similar note in April, vowing that if elected, he would
ask his attorney general to initiate a prompt review of Bush-era actions
to distinguish between possible "genuine crimes" and "really bad
policies".
"[I]f crimes have been committed, they should be investigated," Obama
told the Philadelphia Daily News. "You're also right that I would not
want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of
Republicans as a partisan witch hunt, because I think we've got too many
problems we've got to solve."
Fascism
But Obama's goons haven't given up. Chicago radio station
WGN-AM is again coming
under attack from the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama for
offering airtime to a controversial author. It is the second time
in recent weeks the station has been the target of an "Obama Action
Wire" alert to supporters of the Illinois Democrat.
Monday night's target was
David
Freddoso, who the campaign said was scheduled to be on the station
from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. Chicago time.
"The author of the latest anti-Barack hit book is appearing on WGN Radio
in the Chicagoland market tonight, and your help is urgently needed to
make sure his baseless lies don't gain credibility," an e-mail sent
Monday evening to Obama supporters reads.
"David Freddoso has made a career off dishonest, extreme hate
mongering," the message said. "And WGN apparently thinks this
card-carrying member of the right-wing smear machine needs a bigger
platform for his lies and smears about Barack Obama -- on the public
airwaves."
The Tribune-owned station was flooded with calls and e-mails about an
hour before an Aug. 27 interview with Stanley Kurtz, a conservative
writer who examined Obama's ties to former 1960s radical William Ayers.
A WGN producer said Monday night's response was about the same as when
Kurtz was on the station.
Fascism
Remember Barack Obama’s
attempt to silence TV stations running an independent ad by American
Issues Project spotlighting The One’s ties to Weather Underground
terrorist Bill Ayers? (link)
And remember the Obama campaign’s attempt to sic the Justice Department
on the GOP donor behind the forbidden ad? (link)
Well, Obama, the government will not do your bidding and intimidate
conservatives exercising their free speech. A spok