The Obama File


Politics
 

Custom Search



Obama is an associate of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America

 

More Stuff
Forum
T O F
 


get NOBAMA bumper stickers here
 

 

 

year

event

issue

  Barack Obama was born of Communist activists, mentored by a communist writer and activist, spent his college days hanging around radical activists, worked as a radical community organizer learning the radical tactics of Alinsky, kept contact with radicals through the years, attends a radical church, and today lends his political skill to the international goals of radical activists, and has radicals working on his campaign. Marxism
1972
to
1979
Accuracy in Media has an in-depth profile of a leftist who influenced Obama during his high school years.  In an article entitled, "Obama's Communist Mentor," Cliff Kincaid identifies a member of the Communist Party USA, who has been influential in Obama's life and education, Frank Marshall Davis, who was a communist -- and born in Kansas.



Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).  The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his "poetry" and getting advice on his career path.  But Obama, in his book, "Dreams From My Father," refers to him repeatedly as just "Frank."  Frank is the black communist writer now considered by some to be in the same category of prominence as Maya Angelou and Alice Walker.

Davis moved to Honolulu from Chicago in 1948 with his second wife Helen Canfield, a white socialite, at the suggestion of his friend the actor Paul Robeson, who advised them that there would be more tolerance of a mixed race couple in Hawaii than on the American mainland.    Robeson, of course, was the well-known black actor and singer who served as a member of the CPUSA and apologist for the old Soviet Union.  Davis had known Robeson from his time in Chicago.

The 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member.  What's more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.

In his book, Obama writes about "a poet named Frank," who visited his family in Hawaii, read poetry, and was full of "hard-earned knowledge" and advice.  Who was Frank?  Obama only says that he had "some modest notoriety once," was "a contemporary of Richard Wright and Langston Hughes during his years in Chicago..." but was now "pushing eighty."  He writes about "Frank and his old Black Power dashiki self" giving him advice before he left for Occidental College in 1979 at the age of 18.

Obama quoted him as saying: "Leaving your race at the door.  Leaving your people behind.  Understand something, boy.  You’re not going to college to get educated.  You’re going there to get trained."

He added, "they’ll tank on your chain and let you know that you may be a well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you’re a nigger just the same."
 
Is it possible that Obama did not know who Davis was when he wrote his book?  That's not plausible, since Obama refers to him as a contemporary of Richard Wright and Langston Hughes and says he saw a book of his black poetry.

But why?  What does Obama have to say about this curious omission?  Could it have something to do with the fact that, by the time Obama wrote his book, he knew that Davis was a Communist?  And that he deliberately covered this up?  Or did he know it earlier?

This is the key question: What did Obama know and when did he know it?

Which of course raises the disturbing questions that must be asked:

Did Davis recruit Obama?

Professor Gerald Horne, a history professor at the University of Houston, noted that Davis, came into contact with Barack Obama and his family and became the young man's mentor, influencing Obama's sense of identity and career moves.

As Horne describes it, Davis, who wrote the memoir, "Living the Blues," had "befriended" a "Euro-American family" that had "migrated to Honolulu from Kansas and a young woman from this family eventually had a child with a young student from Kenya East Africa who goes by the name of Barack Obama, who retracing the steps of Davis eventually decamped to Chicago."

Dr. Kathryn Takara, a professor of Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa who also confirms that Davis is the "Frank" in Obama’s book, did her dissertation on Davis and spent much time with him between 1972 until he passed away in 1987.

In an analysis posted online, she notes that Davis, who was a columnist for the Honolulu Record, brought "an acute sense of race relations and class struggle throughout America and the world" and that he openly discussed subjects such as American imperialism, colonialism and exploitation. She described him as a "socialist realist" who attacked the work of the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Davis, in his own writings, had said that Robeson and Harry Bridges, the head of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and a secret member of the CPUSA, had suggested that he take a job as a columnist with the Honolulu Record "and see if I could do something for them." The ILWU was organizing workers there and Robeson’s contacts were "passed on" to Davis, Takara writes.

Takara says that Davis "espoused freedom, radicalism, solidarity, labor unions, due process, peace, affirmative action, civil rights, Negro History week, and true Democracy to fight imperialism, colonialism, and white supremacy. He urged coalition politics."

Poems from Davis are in the book "Black Moods" which was edited by John Tidwell, a University of Kansas professor and expert on Davis' writings.  He confirmed to Kincaid that Davis joined the Communist Party but that he publicly tried to deny his affiliations.

Asked why Takara thought Obama didn't identify Frank in his book by his full name, she replied, "Maybe, he didn't want people delving into it."

Stanley Dunham, Obama's grandfather, was friends with Davis, a bohemian libertine who drank heavily and loved jazz -- both had roots reaching back to Kansas and had families of mixed races -- and the black writer took an interest in Obama.

"Our grandfather ... thought (Frank) was a point of connection, a bridge if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother," Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, said during a recent interview.

For Obama, Davis was an intriguing figure, "with his books and whiskey breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes."

Dunham and his grandson would spend evenings at Davis's dilapidated home in Waikiki, Honolulu's main tourist district.  Davis, who had raised a family with a white wife, would read his poetry and share whiskey with Dunham, Obama recalled.

Dawna Weatherly-Williams, a friend of Davis' who also lives in Honolulu, said Dunham wanted Obama to know that there were other children like him who were part black and part white, she said.

"Stan was real proud of that," she said, adding that it was rare to see black men with white women at the time.

"He knew Stan real well.  They’d play Scrabble and drink and crack jokes and argue.   Frank always won and he was always very braggadocio about it too.  It was all jocular.  They didn’t get polluted drunk.  And Frank never really did drugs, though he and Stan would smoke pot together."

"Stan had been promising to bring Barry by because we all had that in common.  Frank’s kids were half-white, Stan’s grandson was half-black and my son was half-black.  We all had that in common and we all really enjoyed it.  We got a real kick out of reality."

Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, told the Associated Press recently that her grandfather had seen Davis was "a point of connection, a bridge if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother"

According to Miss Weatherly-Williams, Davis lost touch with Dunham some time in the 1980s.

Obama describes driving to Davis' home in Waikiki after learning that his white grandmother was so afraid of a black panhandler she did not want to take the bus to work. Davis told the teenager that his grandmother was correct to feel scared because she understood African-Americans "have a reason to hate."

Davis said Obama's grandfather would never understand people like him because they hadn't experienced the humiliations he had, according to Obama's memoir. As he left Davis's house that night, Obama wrote, he knew he was completely alone for the first time in his life.

Davis appears again later in the book, when Obama recalls meeting the writer shortly before leaving for college on the mainland. At that meeting, Davis scolded Obama for his listless attitude toward college and warned him not to leave his race behind, which he called "the real price of admission" to higher education. Davis went on to tell Obama that no matter how well he did in college, his race would be a glass ceiling.

Read more here -- and here -- and here.

Marxism

1980

Obama entered Occidental College in California in 1979.

In his first memoir, "Dreams," Obama included a description of black student life at Occidental College in Los Angeles.

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs," he wrote.  "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

He added: "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully.  The more politically active black students.  The foreign students.  The Chicanos.  The Marxist professors and structural feminists."

You are know by your friends and associates -- and Obama's are the hard-core leftists.

Marxism

1981

A recurrent theme in Obama’s career is Power to the People gestures and Ivy League results.

Obama transferred to Columbia and majored in political science with a specialization in  international relations -- and
swaps drugs for Marxism.
Marxism
1982 He regularly attended the Marxist-Socialist conferences at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn and started lecturing his relatives until they worried he'd become "one of those freaks you see on the streets around here." Marxism
1985 Obama answered a help-wanted ad for a position as a community organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago.   Obama was 24 years old, unmarried, and according to his memoir, searching for a genuine African-American community.

Both the CCRC and the DCP were built on the Alinsky model of community agitation, wherein paid organizers learned how to "rub raw the sores of discontent," in Alinsky's words.

One of Obama's early mentors in the Alinsky method was Mike Kruglik, who had this to say to an interviewer of The New Republic, about Obama:

"He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not living up to their own standards. As with the panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they could make things better."

The agitator's job, according to Alinsky, is first to bring folks to the "realization" that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an almighty stink that the dastardly  governments and corporations will see imminent "self-interest" in granting whatever it is that will cause the harassment to cease.

In these methods, euphemistically labeled "community organizing," Obama had a four-year education, which he often says was the best education he ever got anywhere.
Alinsky

1985

Obama goes to work at a Chicago housing project, Altgeld Gardens, where he refines his skills.

Here, Obama worked as an ethnic activist, helping the impoverished black community wring more money and services from the government.  That government money was wrecking the morals of the housing-project residents seems obvious from his book, but Obama never comes out and says it.  Numerous white moderates assume that a man of Obama’s superlative intelligence must be kidding when he espouses his cast-iron liberalism on race-related policies, but they don’t understand the emotional imperative of racial loyalty to him.

His mentor during this period was the veteran local agitator, Hazel Johnson, who who disputes the version of events at Altgeld Gardens that Obama wrote of in his book and tells audiences at his political gatherings.

While working as a community organizer, Obama was repeatedly asked to join Christian congregations but begged off.

"I remained a reluctant skeptic, doubtful of my own motives ..." he wrote.

Alinsky

1989

Obama's law school friends say he did not want anyone to assume they knew his mind and because of that, even those close to him did not always know exactly where he stood.

"He then and now is very hard to pin down," said Kenneth Mack, a classmate and now a professor at the law school, referring to the senator’s on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand style.

Mack added, "Obama stood out from the beginning.  He seemed more mature.  Everyone understood he was a liberal.  He didn't hide that."

Progressivism

1989 In a page-one footnote of what may be the zaniest-titled article ever published by the Harvard Law Review: "The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn From Modern Physics," authored by noted legal scholar Laurence Tribe.

The 39-page densely argued treatise argues that constitutional jurisprudence should be updated in a similar way that Einstein's theory of relativity replaced Newtonian mechanics, a view that would release judges from the original intent of the Founders of America.

Published in 1989, with help of the much younger and politically greener Mr. Obama, the long-ago article could indicate his views on the Constitution, which, if he is elected, could come into play in such matters as his choice of nominees to the Supreme Court.

If Mr. Obama captures the White House, he might not curve space but may settle for setting aside a high-altitude seat on the Supreme Court for his former teacher, Mr. Tribe, who is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard.
Supreme Court

1991

Obama moves back to Chicago where he takes a job with the civil rights law firm, Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Galland.

 

1993

Over the next several years, Obama represents victims of housing and employment discrimination and works on voting-rights legislation for a small public-interest firm.

He also began teaching at the University of Chicago Law School, although he declined to pursue a tenure-track post, hoping to save time for politics.

Progressivism

1996

Obama received the endorsement of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for the Illinois state senate seat.  Obama is an associate of the Chicago branch of the DSA.

A close examination of Obama's first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career.  The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.

Socialism
1996 Obama, who has no military service record, is elected to the Illinois State Senate as a Democrat. Defense

1996
to
2000

His political history in Illinois shows that Obama has proven himself to be a nearly perfect Progressive-Democrat.

Progressivism

2002 In October, Obama gives a speech at an antiwar rally in Chicago  opposing the invasion of Iraq, saying, "I am not opposed to all wars.  I am opposed to dumb wars." Defense
2005 When the nomination of John Roberts as chief justice of the Supreme Court came up in the Senate in 2005, Obama argued that the role of a justice is to favor the "weak" over the "strong."

When the nomination of Sam Alito as an associate justice came up in January 2006, he made the same argument.

Obama does not want a Supreme Court that preserves the rule of law, he wants a Supreme Court that wages class war under color of law.

So, in Obama's vision, who are the "weak" and who are the "strong"?  Who deserves to win the "hearts" of Supreme Court justices?  Who does not?

In contrast to his soaring campaign rhetoric about bringing America together, Obama's Senate speeches against Justices Roberts and Alito revealed a polarizing vision of America.  Minorities, women, employees and criminal defendants were among the weak; majorities, men, employers and prosecutors among the strong.
Courts
2006 Here is a video of Obama enthusiastically campaigning for openly socialist Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.  Sanders, who won his seat in 2006, called Obama "one of the great leaders of the United States Senate," even though Obama had only been in the body for less than two years. Socialism
2006 In October, Obama publishes "The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream," which details his views of politics and his vision for the future of the U.S. government and its people.

"Malcolm X’s autobiography seemed to offer something different," Obama wrote.  "His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me; the blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will."

He added: "Malcolm’s discovery toward the end of his life, that some whites might live beside him as brothers in Islam, seemed to offer some hope of eventual reconciliation."

Some whites? -- if they are Muslims? -- all whites have to do is to submit to Islam? -- this guy still thinks like a Muslim.
Race
2007 An analysis of "lifetime voting records," shows Obama as the most liberal Democrat in Congress, with a score of 84.3 after two full years in the Senate.  The most liberal score possible was 99.

The study, released in March by the National Journal, a respected inside-the-Beltway research report, places Obama even in front of Dennis Kucinich, with a lifetime score of 79.4.
Progressivism
2007 'We don't care about the world as it is, we imagine the world as it might be.  We want to write a new chapter,'" Obama told the crowd.  "That is the moment that we are in right now." Socialism
2007 Obama endorses "comparable worth," a truly bad idea.  In case you don't know what comparable worth is, it's an idea concocted by feminists in the 1970s or early 1980s.  They said that jobs typically held by women pay less than jobs typically held by men.

To eliminate this inequity, somebody–the courts, maybe, or some administrative agency, presumably with appeals to the courts–should decide what those jobs were really worth, based on some sort of convoluted criteria.  So that it could be possible to prove that secretaries were of comparable worth to truck drivers and should be paid the same wages.

Comparable worth would subject the private-sector economy to the equivalent of the federal civil service system.  Bureaucrats would have to classify every job, with their classifications subject to administrative and judicial review.
Marxism
2007 Seeking to add heft to his presidential bid, Democrat Barack Obama is offering a sweeping plan that would require every American to have health coverage and calls on government, businesses and consumers to share the costs of the program.

It's n
ot surprising that a socialist would push for socialized medicine.
Socialism
2007 On July 18th, ABC News' Teddy Davis and Lindsey Ellerson reported that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., told Planned Parenthood that sex education for kindergarteners is "the right thing to do." (Video at link). Homosexual Agenda
2007 His "solutions" will sound familiar to those who listened to Lyndon Johnson's poverty gurus and their fellow travelers under Jimmy Carter who promised massive government assistance:

"When I'm President, I will raise the minimum wage and make it a living wage by making sure that it rises every time the cost of living does. I'll start letting our unions do what they do best again – organize our workers and lift up our middle-class. And I'll finally make sure every American has affordable health care that stays with you no matter what happens by passing my plan to provide universal coverage and cut the cost of health care by up to $2500 per family."

"The philosophy behind the project is simple – if poverty is a disease that infects an entire community in the form of unemployment and violence; failing schools and broken homes, then we can't just treat those symptoms in isolation. We have to heal that entire community. And we have to focus on what actually w
orks."

It was federal government policies and programs that caused most of the problems of the inner city today. The fact that Obama wants to try more of the same only shows that absolute dearth of ideas emanating from the left regarding urban policy. They just can't help themselves. And Obama can no longer disguise his far left policies by advocating them using soothing, non-threatening rhetoric.

If it walks like one, talks like a one and spends like a one, it must be a socialist.
Socialism
2007 Obama, sharing his vision of America as welfare state with the annual meeting of the National Council of La Raza, compared last year's massive immigration rallies, led by Hispanics, to the civil-rights marches of African-Americans in the 1960's.

To the Harvard-trained lawyer, the illegal immigrants are just "undocumented immigrants" who just haven't had a chance to get the paperwork done.

It certainly is new for someone, campaigning for our nation's highest office, to see representation of the millions who are here illegally, as part of those responsibilities.

Can it be that Obama thinks he is running for secretary-general of the United Nations and not president of the United States?
Illegal Immigration
2007 On Thursday, November 1st, Obama made this startling comment, "We've got to make sure that people who have more money help the people who have less money."

Obama agrees with Karl Marx on income redistribution.
Marxism
2007 At the Apollo Theater fundraiser, Obama was introduced by the radical Marxist professor and self-styled rapper, Cornell West, as "my comrade."



What does this tell you about Obama, when he chooses to be introduced by one of the most radical Marxists in America as, "my comrade?"

Watch this video --  Cornell doesn't trust Obama -- Why the change in attitude?

What promises did Obama make to cause this 180?

Marxism
2008 In California, in order to garner support from Hispanics, Obama announces his support for granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.

"Barack Obama has not backed down" on driver's licenses for illegal  immigrants, said Federico Peña, a former Clinton administration Cabinet member and Denver mayor now supporting Obama.  "I think when the Latino community hears Barack's position on such an important and controversial issue, they'll understand that his heart and his intellect is with Latino community."

Obama supports driver's license for illegals.  This fact alone disqualifies him.
Illegal Immigration
2008 The National Journal identifies Barack Obama, D-Ill., as the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings.  The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate. Progressivism
2008 Also on the 31st, Obama said he would pay for his proposed new programs, including mandatory health insurance, by imposing higher taxes on "the wealthy" and raising the tax on Social Security wages.  He added, "What we have had right now is a situation where we've cut taxes for people who don't need them."

According to recent Gallup data, "The wealthiest 1 percent of the population earn 19 percent of the income, but pay 37 percent of the income tax.  The top 10 percent pay 68 percent of the tab.

Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent -- those below the median income level -- now earn 13 percent of the income but pay just 3 percent of the taxes.

Should government determine how much money people "need"?

This is Marxism: "from each according to his ability; to each according to his need."

Socialized Medicine
2008 A health care mandate is not the only new regulation that Obama wants to impose. For example, he would require businesses to pay an undefined "living wage." He would require paid "family and medical leave." He would regulate mortgages and credit card interest rates. He would impose a host of environmental and labor restrictions. The net cost of this regulatory burden almost certainly will be higher unemployment and greater poverty.

And it's not just businesses that would feel the regulatory hand of an Obama presidency. Consumers too will have to pay, as he imposes new costs on products ranging from homes to automobiles and appliances. In almost everything we do, Obama sees a need for the government to intervene.

A President Obama would mean a much bigger, more intrusive, and costlier government. Indeed, when considering his policies, one searches in vain for any break with liberal orthodoxy. Personal accounts for Social Security? Entitlement reform? School choice? Obama rejects them all, calling such proposals, "Social Darwinism."
Regulation
2008 Obama's grand theme is to spread America's wealth to the world's poor, as the onetime community organizer from the streets of South Chicago goes global.

He says to his followers, "It's not too late to claim the American dream," and they cheer wildly, and some even cry.

Don't they know that the American dream isn't a wish granted by a politician, or an entitlement from the government? Do they need a political seer to tell them what to hope for, and dream of, because they are unable to find it for themselves?

In his most recent victory speech, delivered in Madison, Wisconsin on February 13, Obama named some of those guilty of creating America's victims. They included:

Exxon, turning record profits from high pump prices
Wall Street, whose agenda smothers Main Street
NAFTA, where the American worker has no voice at the negotiating table
Lobbyists, who drown out the peoples' voice.
Taxes
2008 February 16th -- Obama unveiled much of his economic strategy in Wisconsin this week: He wants to spend $150 billion on a green-energy plan.  He wants to establish an infrastructure investment bank to the tune of $60 billion.  He wants to expand health insurance by roughly $65 billion.  He wants to "reopen" trade deals, which is another way of saying he wants to raise the barriers to free trade.

He intends to regulate the profits for drug companies, health insurers, and energy firms.  He wants to establish a mortgage-interest tax credit.  He wants to double the number of workers receiving the earned income tax credit, the EITC, and triple the EITC benefit for minimum-wage workers.  The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion.  And tax hikes on the rich won’t pay for it.  It’s the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden in terms of higher taxes and lower growth.

This isn’t free enterprise.  It’s old-fashioned-liberal tax, and spend, and regulate.  It’s plain ol’ big government.  The only people who will benefit are the central planners in Washington.

The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Mr. Obama’s tax plan.  He says it will add up to a 39.6% personal income tax, a 52.2% combined income and payroll tax, a 28% capital-gains tax, a 39.6% dividends tax, and a 55% estate tax.

Not only is Mr. Obama the big-spending candidate, he’s also the very-high-tax candidate.  And what he wants to tax is capital.

Obama doesn't understand the vital role of capital formation in creating businesses and jobs.  He doesn't understand that without capital, businesses can’t expand their operations and hire more workers?
Taxes
2008 February 17th -- Sen. Barack Obama, giving America a preview of his priorities, is rejoicing over the Senate committee passage of a plan that could end up costing taxpayers billions of dollars in an attempt to reduce poverty in other nations.

The nice-sounding bill, called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a $845 billion global tax on the United States.  The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

The U.N.'s "Millennium Project," says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of its GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends.  Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the "Millennium Development Goals," this amounts to $845 billion.  And the only way to raise that kind of money is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

Here's an abstract of the proposed legislation:

"To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the [U.N.] Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."

The scary part of the bill is this:

In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The Millennium Declaration also affirms the U.N. as "the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development."

Here's how Senator Obama's website frames the bill:

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," said Senator Obama. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world. Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing corporate profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere."
 

Will somebody tell this idiot that it's not the job of the United States to cut global poverty by taxing its citizens and giving those monies to the corrupt United Nations.

Welfare doesn't work in America and its sure not going to work anywhere else.  It's just more billions and trillions down the toilet.

Taxes
2008 March 4th, Obama offers a policy of dialogue and accommodation.  He has opposed listing Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization and proposed a grand bargain with Syria's rulers.  He is even prepared to ignore two UN Security Council resolutions that require Iran to stop its uranium-enrichment program as a precondition for talks at the highest level.  He has campaigned for a formal congressional move to prevent Bush from taking any military action against Tehran.

In an important symbolic move designed to signal an end of the special relationship between Israel and America, Obama has become the first major presidential candidate in 25 years not to commit himself to transferring the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Last but not least, Obama has promised to withdraw from Iraq in his first year in office -- meeting a key demand of all radical Islamist forces, Sunni and Shiite.

The message is clear: Obama wants a new relationship with radical forces in the Islamic world while distancing America from its traditional regional allies.  In other words, he proposes to reverse policies that have taken shape over more than six decades under 12 successive American presidents.
Defense

Foreign Relations
2008 March 24th -- Are you an authentic white person?  For the answer to that, we need to go to the current authentic black community.  They are the ones who define who is and who is not an authentic member of their race.  Be they black or white.  (Since Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc., have not yet amassed political clout, they're excluded from being categorized by their skin color.)

The reigning Black elite have decided that authentic "typical white people" are inherently racist.  As Obama so blithely stated, this prejudice is inbred and rears its ugly head every time a white encounters a black.  For those whites who believe reparations to date, in the form of trillions of dollars, affirmative action, special dispensations and a color-coded justice system, have adequately addressed the shame of their ancestors' sin of slavery, well, it hasn't.  We are informed that racial prejudice is still rampant in American society.  If you don't see it, its because it has taken the more insidious form of "institutional racism."

Not to worry, Obama assures us we can change.  Phew!  Just elect him President, and by virtue of the moral authority inherent in his skin color, he will kindly inform and advise his fellow Americans, excuse me, his fellow white Americans, on the proper obeisance and reparations due all black people.  Oops, I meant, all "authentic" black people.  Uncle Toms like Condoleeza Rice, Clarence Thomas, and other successful black people who succeeded on their own merit are not "authentic," and most decidedly not representative of the oppressed black community.
Race
2008 March 28th -- It's All a Distraction! (Posted:  Brian Faughnan on March 28, 2008 02:25 PM)

Obama on Jeremiah Wright:

Part of what I hope to do in this campaign and as president is to get us beyond these divisions that distract us from our common challenges and our common opportunities and move the country forward.

On going to war in Iraq:

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income -- to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

Obama on attacks by Hillary:

We knew that the closer we got to the change we seek, the more we'd see of the politics we're trying to end -- the attacks and distortions that try to distract us from the issues that matter to people's lives, the stunts and the tactics that ask us to fear instead of hope.

On gay marriage:

The heightened focus on marriage is a distraction from other, attainable measures to prevent discrimination and gays and lesbians.

Obama on race, gay marriage, abortion, and illegal immigration:

We get distracted from solving problems such as health care, employment or the environment because of these divisions.  It happens in every election, and it's not just race.  It's immigration, gay people or abortion.  There's always one of these issues that crops up and prevents us from focusing on vital issues that this country's long-term well-being depends on us solving.

It's not all that original to note that much of Obama's rhetoric is pretty vague -- often vapid.  But I've begun to notice how many things Obama regards as distractions.  When he labels a given issue a 'distraction,' he's saying that someone is whipping up a an issue from whole cloth simply for political gain.

So who does he think is being insincere: gays who want to marry, or people of faith who think marriage is for a man and a woman?  How about in the competition between border enforcement advocates and those who want amnesty for illegal aliens?  Or between those who favor abortion on demand, and those who believe life begins at conception?

All of these are important public policy questions, with divisions among Americans that prevent easy solutions.  Obama shouldn't denigrate broad swaths of the population just because it would be difficult to address their concerns.
Distraction
2008 March 31st -- Economic conservatives have a special love for cutting capital gains taxes. Not only do they feel it is one of the most destructive taxes that exists, but it was the 1978 capital gains tax cut -- along with Proposition 13 the same year in California -- that really launched the supply-side tax revolution.  Now Obama says he wants to nearly double the capital gains tax rate.  Here is what he told CNBC's Maria Bartiromo last week:

"Well, you know, I haven't given a firm number.  Here's my belief, that we can't go back to some of the, you know, confiscatory rates that existed in the past that distorted sound economics.  And I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was 28 percent.  I would -- and my guess would be it would be significantly lower than that.  I think that we can have a capital gains rate that is higher than 15 percent.  If it -- and if it, you know -- when I talk to people like Warren Buffett or others and I ask them, you know, what's -- how much of a difference is it going to be if it's 20 or 25 percent, they say, look, if it's within that range, then it's not going to distort, I think, economic decision making."

My take: Obama got it wrong.  The capital gains rate during the Clinton administration fell from 28 percent at the beginning to 20 percent with the signing of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 in August of that year.  Interestingly, the economy managed only two years of growth of 4 percent or more in the decade previous to the 1997 cap gains cut -- but notched three straight years of such growth in 1997, 1998, and 1999.
Taxes
2008 April 3rd -- Obama is embracing anti-gun policies in the run-up to a Democratic presidential debate scheduled on the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings.

"I am not in favor of concealed weapons," Obama told the Pittsburgh Tribune.  "I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations."

These remarks break from Obama’s previous moderate rhetoric on gun control.

While campaigning in Idaho in February, Obama promised, "I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns."
2nd
Amendment
2008 April 9th -- Obama has surrounded himself with racists, socialists, Marxists, communists, domestic terrorists and accused felons, yet has an uncanny ability to mesmerize the mainstream media into believing the people with whom he associates in the long term do not reflect upon him personally.

"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied, they were relieved -- such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn’t seem angry all the time."

That is a quote from Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.  He has learned to play the game well.  Regardless of the company he keeps, his smiling well mannered persona has indeed been an effective shield into the psyche of Barack Obama.
Marxism
2008 April 10th -- The Democratic presidential front-runner favors repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy , which was instituted during the Clinton administration.

"But I think there's increasing recognition within the Armed Forces that this is a counterproductive strategy," he said.  "We're spending large sums of money to kick highly qualified gays or lesbians out of our military, some of whom possess specialties like Arab-language capabilities that we desperately need.  That doesn't make us more safe."

"The gay press may feel like I'm not giving them enough love, but basically all press feels that way at all times," Obama told The Advocate.  He said he's frequently spoken out against homophobia and in support of gay rights.

Asked what he could reasonably accomplish for the gay community as president, Obama said he can "reasonably see" repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy as well as signing legislation to ban workplace discrimination against gays.  He said he'd like transgendered people to be covered by the law, but thinks it would be tough to get such legislation through Congress.

Obama also said he's interested in ensuring that same-sex couples in civil unions get federal benefits.
Homosexual
Agenda
2008 April 12th -- Obama came under fire today for saying small-town Pennsylvania residents were "bitter" and "cling to guns or religion," in comments his rivals said showed an elitist view of the middle class.

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them." Obama said.

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." he said.

What makes this so breathtaking is the mindless, casual way in which Obama reveals his snobbishness and elitism.  We saw hints of this from Michelle Obama, in her assertions about never being proud of her country until her husband ran for President.  We had not seen it from Obama himself in such a blatant and unmistakable manner.  The matter-of-fact style in which he spoke this shows the unthinking contempt he has for people he has never engaged -- an acceptance of stereotypes without questioning them that shows his own bigotry, not to mention foolishness and poor judgment.
Elitism
2008 April 12th -- Obama explains that simple rural folks and other proletarians would abandon their unpleasant devotion to firearms and religion if only the Executive Branch of the Federal Government would preserve their factory jobs.  If Obama sounds familiar here, he should. His comments have a proud pedigree.

"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people.  The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness.  To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions."

That is Karl Marx in Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, 1843.  Obama is saying exactly the same thing as Marx.  They each argue religion exists because the life of a proletarian worker is frustrating and unsatisfying.  Both Obama and Marx argue that the proletarians cling to religion, not for its own sake, but because the economic system is not satisfying their social needs.  To Marx’s evaluation of religion, Obama adds firearms and other aspects of rural life in America that progressives don’t approve of.

This isn’t a mistake.  This isn’t a misquote.  This is another insight into how Obama thinks.  The comments that he and his wife make reveal their "progressive" world view.  It is socialist, it is fascist and it is obvious.  All you have to do is listen.
Marxism
2008 April 12th -- Let’s break the statement into its component insults:

"[T]hey cling to guns…"  Cling to guns? Americans have "clung" to guns since the founding of the Republic.  It’s such a core value to this nation that its founders placed it second on the Bill of Rights, right after freedom of speech and religion.  Speaking of which …

"or [they cling to] religion …"  People don’t become religious because the economy hits a few bumps in the road.  Obama may have chosen his religion based on politics, but most people follow a religion out of a deeper sense of spirituality.  I can’t think of a more condescending and contemptuous analysis of religious dedication than this statement.

"or [they cling to] antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…"  Small-town voters are bigots and xenophobes; there’s no other way to read the first part of this statement.  The second part, about them being "anti-immigrant," is a non-sequitur.  They may be anti-illegal immigrant, but that’s a far different issue.  Obama offers no proof that small-town voters are xenophobes, but the Frisco audience didn’t demand any, either.  It’s part of their own bigotry that makes them see middle America in those terms.

"or [they cling to] anti-trade sentiment …"  And this is just jaw-droppingly hypocritical.  This comes from the same candidate who opposes the Colombian free-trade agreement and wants to throw NAFTA out the window.  Who’s clinging to anti-trade sentiment?  Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Big Labor.

It would be difficult to be any more condescending or insulting in so many ways to so many voters in a single sentence.  It reveals a deeply elitist and shockingly callow candidate.  It’s the "Let them eat cake" of 2008.
Elitism
2008 April 12th -- In order to stop the "bitter" bleeding, Obama responded to the Pennsylvania gaff with the following video:

 

 


I found this video very illuminating, as it demonstrates Obama employing the Alinsky agitation technique of "rubbing raw the sores of discontent." (Alinsky's words)

Watch as Obama sets up a list of grievances, gets everyone angry  and then leads the choir in an emotional response to Washington's failures -- "they (Americans) can't count on Washington" -- and ends strong -- he's the answer to everything he says is wrong with America.

The entire exercise was to change the discussion.  Obama never addressed his condescending remarks.  Instead, he got his audience mad at Washington -- he changed the subject.

Note the difference between what Obama said in his unguarded moment at San Francisco's "Billionair's Row," and the cleaned-up version he tried to sell tonight.

At the Getty Mansion (see picture below -- 4/6/2008):

"So it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

With "the folks" in Indiana:

"So people end up voting on issues like guns and are they going to have the right to bear arms. They vote on issues like gay marriage. They take refuge in their faith and their community, and their family, and the things they can count on."

Elitism
2008 April 12th -- At North Carolina's Wesleyan College in Rocky Mount, N.C., Clinton campaign North Carolina chieftain Tom Hendrickson, a former state party chair, made much hay out of the "small town" comments made by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

"I normally just come and talk about President Clinton and Senator Clinton at these, but today Senator Obama was out at a fundraiser at I guess a brie and chardonnay crowd in San Francisco," Hendrickson said.  "But his quote talking about small towns in Pennsylvania -- and which applies to small towns across eastern North Carolina -- which is why it is relevant to this tour we are doing today.  And his quote is 'and it is not surprising that they cling to guns and religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them, or anti-immigrant or anti-trade as a way to explain their frustration.'"

"I listened to that quote and I got mad," Hendrickson said, "and I wanted to reach out to Senator Obama and say senator, we are from the rural part of eastern North Carolina.  We are very proud of our heritage, we are proud of who we are.  We are not frustrated.  We are not bitter.  We turn to our faith because we believe, and we hunt and fish because it is part of our culture and we enjoy it."
Elitism
2008 April 17th -- Obama is quoted as saying this during last night's debate:

"I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

Here's a few examples -- make up your own:

"Just because you have an individual right [to free speech] does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

"Just because you have an individual right [not to be searched unreasonably] does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

"Just because you have an individual right [to freely exercise religion] does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

"Just because you have an individual right [to an abortion] does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

"Just because you have an individual right [to bear arms] does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."

Does anyone else find this disturbing?
2nd
Amendment
2008 April 18th -- Weather Underground leader turned-academic William Ayers is now so docile that it never really "bothered anyone in Chicago," that Sen. Barack Obama had any connection to him, wrote Chicago Sun-Times reporter Lynn Sweet in the April 18 paper.  Along those same lines the Washington Post's Peter Slevin argued that the '60s radical was now "considered so mainstream" in Chicago "that [Mayor Richard] Daley issued a statement on Thursday praising him as a 'distinguished professor of education' and a 'valued member of the Chicago community.'"

But while he may have forsaken violence long ago, as his blog attests, Ayers's politics are far from mainstream, and go far beyond the standard Democratic arguments to withdraw from Iraq.  For example, Ayers wants to pay reparations in Iraq AND Afghanistan and practically withdraw the U.S. military from the entirety of the Middle East, even in countries that have longstanding security arrangements with the U.S.
Terrorism
2008 April 19th -- Obama’s presidential campaign has worked to assure uneasy gun owners that he believes the Constitution protects their rights and that he doesn’t want to take away their guns.

But before he became a national political figure, he sat on the board of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago-based foundation that doled out at least nine grants totaling nearly $2.7 million to groups that advocated the opposite positions.

The foundation funded legal scholarship advancing the theory that the Second Amendment does not protect individual gun owners’ rights, as well as two groups that advocated handgun bans.  And it paid to support a book called "Every Handgun Is Aimed at You: The Case for Banning Handguns."
2nd
Amendment
2008 April 21st -- On Sunday, Obama took the low road in defending his relationship with the terrorist, Bill Ayers.  Obama invoked some bizarre kind of moral equivalence between Ayers' explosive past and that of a Senate colleague, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma.

During the debate, Obama had said, "I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions.  Do I need to apologize for Coburn's statements?"

No, Sen. Obama, just your own, including this latest round.  Coburn may be pro-life, but -- unlike Ayers -- he never acted violently on his beliefs.  Coburn, a doctor who has delivered more than 4,000 babies, never bombed an abortion clinic.  The Oklahoman made his remark in the context of abortion being made illegal, which it isn't.  As someone once said of another famous senator: Sen. Obama, have you no shame?

John McCain found Obama's remarks offensive, saying "Coburn was a great humanitarian," and "to compare him (Ayers) with Dr. Coburn, who spends so much of his life bringing babies into this world, that in my view is really -- borders on the outrageous.  He became friends with him and spent time with him while the guy was unrepentant over his activities as a member of a terrorist organization, the Weatherman.   Does he condemn them?  Would he condemn someone who says they're unrepentant and wished they had bombed more?"
Terrorism
2008 April 25th -- FBI files from 1976, recently made public under the Freedom of Information Act, confirm the connections between the Weatherman, Havana, and Moscow.  Weatherman leaders like Mark Rudd traveled illegally to Havana in 1968 to engage in terrorist training.  There, camps set up by Soviet KGB Colonel Vadim Kotchergine were educating Westerners both in Marxist philosophy and urban warfare.

At a 1969 "War Council" in Flint, Michigan, Weatherman leader and Obama buddy, Bernardine Dohrn, (currently a law professor at Northwestern University and a Board member of the ACLU) praised the serial murderer Charles Manson and his accomplices: "Dig it. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them.  They even shoved a fork into the victim's stomach.  Wild."

She then proclaimed that the time had come to launch a war against "Amerikkka" (Weatherman always spelled "America" this way, to convey the group's belief that the nation was ineradicably racist to its core). 

Toward this end, Dohrn advocated the formation of an even more radical "Weather Underground" cult to carry out covert terrorist activities rather than public acts of protest.  By early 1970, her wish would be realized.

The Weather Underground went on to claim credit for some 25 bombings over the next several years, detonating explosives at the rebuilt Haymarket statue, a bathroom at the Pentagon, the Capitol barber shop, the New York City police headquarters, and a variety of other targets.

Dohrn and her husband Bill Ayers remain unrepentant.  On 9/11, the NY Times ran an interview in which Ayers regrets not having set more bombs, and (presumably) killed more Americans.
Terrorism
2008 On April 28th, Barack Obama defended his commitment to patriotic ideals this afternoon, telling a town hall meeting in North Carolina that "I always have the flag in my heart."

He just won't wear one on his lapel or salute it during the National Anthem.
Patriotism
2008 April 29th, -- George Will posed thirteen questions for Obama.

The first -- "Senator, concerning the criteria by which you will nominate judges, you said: 'We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom.  The empathy to understand what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old.'  Such sensitivities might serve an admirable legislator, but what have they to do with judging?  Should a judge side with whichever party in a controversy stirs his or her empathy?  Is such personalization of the judicial function inimical to the rule of law?"

And there's twelve more critical questions at this link -- worth a visit.
Courts
2008 April 29th -- Obama says, "I still believe in affirmative action as a means of overcoming both historic and potentially current discrimination ..."

And what  is "potentially current discrimination?"
Quotas
2008 Obama's proposal for a windfall profits tax on oil companies could cost $15 billion a year at last year's profit levels, a campaign adviser said.

The plan would target profit from the biggest oil companies by taxing each barrel of oil costing more than $80, according to a fact sheet on the proposal.  The tax would help pay for a $1,000 tax cut for working families, an expansion of the earned-income tax credit and assistance for people who can't afford their energy bills.

And the oil companies would pass that on to the consumer -- great idea!
Taxes
2008 May 5th --


Obama's terrorist buddy, Bill Ayers, shows where he STANDS on things.

The photo was taken to promote Ayers’s book, "Fugitive Days" and published by Chicago Mag in their August 2001 issue.

This guy is still a hard-core communist as he proudly announces on his red communist star-headed website.

Patriotism
5/5/08 May 5th -- Kinda brings this to mind.



Two damned peas in a pod!

Patriotsim
5/6/08 Asked to explain this totally weird comparison -- 20 years of hearing his pastor’s racist rants vs. his grandmother’s one-time confession -- Obama replied that his grandmother was a "typical white person."

Conclusion: Obama defends the indefensible, embraces those who say the indefensible, and trashes the people who love him.

Why?  Because the indefensible crowd speaks for him!  It is not in Obama’s nature to be aggressive and confrontational, insulting or hurtful, vicious or adversarial.  But all of these traits are clearly in his heart and soul and psyche!  Why else would he defend them?

Obama is a typical passive-aggressive personality who pretends to be a nice guy by using fuzzy language and a let’s-all-get-together mantra to seduce his acolytes, but who relies on his surrogates -- wifey, minister, terrorist endorsements, et al -- to express his real agenda, i.e., getting back!  But getting back at whom?

My theory is that Obama wants to "get back" at all those evil capitalists and racist entities that robbed his Marxist mother, father, and stepfather of the respect he thought they deserved.  According to the writer Spengler in a riveting L.A. Times article, both his wife and mother "reveal his secret: he hates America."
Marxism
5/7/08 Scott at PowerLine blog noted that Senator Obama's victory speech last night turned impressively to the general election campaign.  He all but clinched the Democratic nomination last night.  His speech sounded very much like a nomination acceptance speech.  I expect that the themes he sounded in his speech last night will reappear in his speech this summer in Denver.

Tom Maguire caught this passage:

I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies, like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.
 
Maguire comments:
 
Obama's supporters are too young to know any of this, but Roosevelt led the United States in the war against Hitler; the Allied policy was unconditional surrender, so there was very little for Roosevelt and Hitler to discuss, and in fact, the two did not meet at all (but they did exchange correspondence before the war).

So my guess is that Obama is thinking of the Yalta Conference with Churchill and Stalin as talking to "our enemies," although of course we were still allied with the Soviet Union against Germany and Japan at that point.  Beyond that, is the Yalta Conference something Obama and his advisers view as a success worthy of emulation?  Puzzling.

And the United States has been talking with Iran right along in any event.  It's not for lack of communication that Iran has been conducting its war on the United States.

When Obama invoked past Democratic presidents in his speech last night, he started with Roosevelt but omitted Johnson, Carter, and Clinton.  Moving on from the Clinton era is part of the thesis of Obama's candidacy, so the omission is understandable.  Of past Democratic presidents, none has set a better example of the pitfalls of "talking to our enemies" than Jimmy Carter, both in his presidency and his travels since (though Carter probably would not acknowledge that his interlocutors are our enemies).

Obama may not be knowledgeable enough to know he doesn't want to emulate Roosevelt at Yalta.  Perhaps he believes that Roosevelt's name sanctions whatever action he can attach to it.  But Obama is smart enough to know that he doesn't want to profess a desire to emulate Jimmy Carter, if only on political grounds.  In substance, however, it seems to me that the president Obama most closely resembles on this point is Carter.
Foreign
Relations
5/8/08 Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama flatly promised to raise taxes in a television interview Thursday afternoon.

"I will raise CEO taxes," Obama told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room."

"If you’re a CEO in this country you’ll probably pay more taxes," Obama said. Obama speculated his CEO tax rates "won’t be prohibitively high, you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine."

Obama also said he would eliminate the Bush tax cuts and install what he called a "middle class tax cut."

Blitzer asked Obama to define "middle class."

Obama replied, "You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough" and said "if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class… On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well."
Taxes
5/9/08 Today's Wall Street Journal publishes a column by former principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration Andrew Biggs on "Obama's faulty tax argument."

Like his improbable history, Obama's argument in favor of higher taxes is both straightforward and misleading.  If Obama is elected president, we can count on at least two things: bad economic policy and bad foreign policy. And we won't be able to say we weren't warned.
Taxes
5/12/08 In an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg for The Atlantic, Barack Obama presents himself as the best friend Israel ever had.

Then he proceeds to call Israel a "constant sore" that "infects all of our foreign policy:" Obama on Zionism and Hamas.

JG: Do you think that Israel is a drag on America’s reputation overseas?

BO: No, no, no. But what I think is that this constant wound, that this constant sore, does infect all of our foreign policy.
Foreign
Relations
5/16/08

Gingrich on appeasers and appeasement (01:10)

Foreign
Relations
5/16/08


On the Right to Keep and Bear Arms  (01:28)

2nd
Amendment
5/17/08 "Frankly, I can be wrong, but I do not think that America can carry to the presidency a candidate as on the left as Barack Obama."

Norman Podhoretz, May 14, 2008
Marxism
5/18/08 During a rally in Roseburg, Oregon, on Saturday, Obama presented himself as the front-runner almost without question -- then had this to say:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"  Obama said.

"That's not leadership.  That's not going to happen." he added.



Do you remember any other time in this nation’s history when we were told by our elected leaders to tighten our belts in order to gain the approval of other countries around the world?

Marxism
5/22/08 Barack Obama on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights.

Expand Hate Crimes Statutes:
In 2004, crimes against LGBT Americans constituted the third-highest category of hate crime reported. Obama co-sponsored legislation to expand federal hate crimes law to include crimes perpetrated because of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Fight Workplace Discrimination and Promote Rights:
Obama believes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity. Obama sponsored legislation in the Illinois State Senate that would ban employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Support Full Civil Unions and Federal Rights for LGBT Couples:
Obama also believes we need to fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally recognized unions.

Oppose a Constitutional Ban on Same-Sex Marriage:
Obama voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would have defined marriage as between a man and a woman and prevented judicial extension of marriage-like rights to same-sex or other unmarried couples.

Repeal Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell:
Obama believes we need to repeal the "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy. The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve. Obama will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure we accomplish our national defense goals.

Fight AIDS Worldwide:

Obama has been a global leader in the fight against AIDS. He traveled to Kenya and took a public HIV test to encourage testing and reduce the stigma of the disease. Obama worked to reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act, one of the largest sources of federal funds for primary health care and support services for HIV/AIDS patients.

Homosexual
Agenda
5/23/08 Old Spin:

In a Democratic presidential debate last summer, Obama was asked if he'd meet the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea without precondition and during his first year in office.

"I would," Obama said.

Since then he has frequently reiterated his belief that no preconditions should be set.

"When you say preconditions, what you're really saying is, 'I'm not going to talk to you until you agree to do exactly what I want you to do,'" Obama said.  "Well, that's not how negotiations take place."

New Spin:

Obama objected on CNN this week to "this obsession with Ahmadinejad" and explained guardedly: "I would be willing to meet with Iranian leaders if we had done sufficient preparations for that meeting.

"Whether Ahmadinejad is the right person to meet with right now, we don't even know how much power he is going to have a year from now," Obama added.  "He is not the most powerful person in Iran."

He said he would expect "to meet with those people who can actually make decisions" in Iran on its nuclear program, its aid to terrorists and destabilization in Iraq.

He did not explain how he would get around Iran's president to other people of influence.
Foreign
Relations
5/23/08 Calling for a new direction when it comes to Cuba, Obama today said as president he would allow unlimited family travel and remittances to the island.

"It's time for more than tough talk that never yields results.  It’s time for a new strategy," he said. "It's time to let Cuban Americans see their mothers and fathers, their sisters and brothers.  It’s time to let Cuban American money make their families less dependent upon the Castro regime."



Obama on Cuba (01:37

Foreign
Relations
5/24/08 Barry Rubin, writing for the Global Research in Information Center website, comments on this statement by Obama:

"Iran, they spend one one-hundredth of what we spend on the military.  I mean if Iran tried to pose a serious threat to us, they wouldn't stand a chance.  And, we should use that position of strength that we have to be bold enough to go ahead and listen.  That doesn't mean we agree with them on everything.  That doesn't, we might not compromise with them on any issues.  But, at least we should find out, are there areas of potential common interest and we can reduce some of the tension that have caused us so many problems around the world."

One cannot pretend away the implications of this paragraph.  Let's list them:

1.  Obama doesn't understand that Iran follows strategies designed to circumvent that problem of unequal power, including terrorism, guerrilla war, deniable attacks, long wars of attrition, the use of surrogates, and so on.

2.  The only way Obama sees the U. S. of using its "position of strength" is to listen to their grievances, as if we are not familiar with them.  In short, the only thing you can do when you are stronger is to get weaker.  Presumably the same applies when you are the weaker party.

3.  Why is Obama so totally unaware that dialogue has been tried?  A decade with the PLO, longer with Hezbollah by other Lebanese, four straight years of European engagement with Tehran over the nuclear issue, multiple U.S. delegations to talk with the Syrians, and so on.  Was nothing learned from this experience?

4.  And what happens afterward, if Obama's dialogue doesn't work?  What cards would he have left?  What readiness to try another course?  Perhaps by then the Iranians will have nuclear weapons and other gains negating that "position of strength" so fecklessly frittered away.

5.  What possible issues can the United States find to compromise with Iran?  Let's say: give them Lebanon (oh, we already did that); ignore their sponsorship of terrorism; give them Iraq; give them Israel; withdraw U.S. forces from the region, accept their having nuclear arms.  What?

6.  Why should the United States be able to reduce tensions through negotiations when Iran wants tensions?  There is an important hint here: if the United States makes concessions, it might buy off tensions.  Since Iran and the others know about Obama's all-carrots-no-sticks worldview, they will make him pay a lot to get the illusion of peace and quiet.

7.  There is no hint, not the slightest, of his understanding the option of using power to intimidate or defeat Iran, or as a way to muster allies.  If Obama had the most minimal comprehension of these issues, he would fake it with some blah-blah about how America would combine toughness with flexibility, deterrence with compromise, steadfastness in order to gain more from the other side in negotiations.  A critical element in peace-keeping, peace-making, and negotiations is to act tough and be strong in order to have leverage.  Even in responding to criticisms, Obama has only talked about whether negotiations are conditional or unconditional and at what level they should be conducted.  He is oblivious to the fact that the chief executive does things other than negotiations.

If this is Obama's strategy while Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons what would he do in dealing with a Tehran owning them?

Make no mistake, Obama is channeling Neville Chamberlain -- precisely because what he says shows his parallel thinking.  Many people may get a chill listening to Obama but it certainly isn't a Churchill.

Apologists, sympathizers, and wishful-thinkers keep endowing this would-be emperor with beautiful suits of clothes.  He doesn't have any.
Foreign
Relations
5/23/08 One of Iran’s top foreign policy goals is a precipitous U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.

One of Obama’s top foreign policy goals is a precipitous U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.

Why should Iran or other rogue states alter their behavior if Obama gives them what they want, without preconditions?
Foreign
Relations
5/30/08 What if Barack Obama’s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along?

Stanley Kurtz provides an in-depth report, showing Obama's intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the largest radical group in America.

If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you’d know what I was talking about.  Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so.  Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower.  Acorn likes it that way.  And so, I’d wager, does Barack Obama.

To understand the nature and extent of Acorn’s radicalism, an excellent place to begin is Sol Stern’s 2003 City Journal article, "ACORN’s Nutty Regime for Cities" or for a shorter but helpful piece, try Steven Malanga’s "Acorn Squash."
Marxism
6/7/08 Obama actively sought and received the stamp of approval of a Marxist third party that operated briefly in Chicago between 1992 and 1998.  The group was called the "New Party" and was started in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson’s 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison).

The New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials -- most often Democrats.  The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America (Obama was an associate of the Chicago branch), and the militant organization ACORN.  The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
Marxism
6/9/08 Obama's proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school.

"Barack Obama supported a proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school or park, which would eliminate almost every gun store in America." is more than just a little exaggeration.
2nd
Amendment
6/9/08 Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama would raise taxes on the rich, but as an investor, he seems eager to cut his own.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama wants to raises taxes on the wealthy, but as a member of that social class, he isn't eager to fall victim himself. He has invested at least $1 million in a fund that yields tax-free income.

The Illinois senator's latest campaign-finance disclosure shows that his investments have nearly tripled in the past two years to as much as $7.4 million, and his income in 2007 surged past $4 million, not counting his government salary.

Obama reported accounts with Morgan Chase Private Client Asset Management, an elite firm that deals only with the rich, as well as a host of retirement accounts, some in the name of his wife, Michelle.
Taxes
6/10/08 On the first day of what is to be a two-week economic tour around the country, Barack Obama said Monday that lawmakers should inject another $50 billion immediately into the sluggish U.S. economy.

"Such relief can't wait until the next president takes office. ... That's why I've called for another round of fiscal stimulus, an immediate $50 billion to help those who've been hit hardest by this economic downturn," Obama told a crowd in Raleigh, N.C.

And he's going to take it from you to give it to them -- it's what socialists do.
Taxes
6/11/08 Barack Obama, measured by his chosen life experiences, closest associations, voting record, and pre-presidential campaign utterances, is, in personality and experience, the least qualified, and, in philosophy and program, most radically left candidate ever offered for the presidency by the Democratic Party.  By comparison, George McGovern, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Al Gore and John Kerry seem the very embodiment of presidential readiness and political