"Islam has always been a part of America’s
Barack Hussein Obama
Obama during Russian anthem
Obama during United States anthem
The Commies Just LUV Obama
remarks to the
National Committee of the Communist Party USA (CVPUSA), Sam Webb, the
CPUSA's National Chair said the following:
I make no attempt to
be comprehensive in these remarks. My aim is much more modest, as you
Let me begin with a simple observation: If the last 30
years were an era of reaction, then the coming decade could turn into an
era of reform, even radical reform. Six months into the Obama
presidency, I would say without hesitation that the landscape,
atmosphere, conversation, and agenda have strikingly changed compared to
the previous eight years.
In this legislative session, we can
envision winning a Medicare-like public option and then going further in
the years ahead.
We can visualize passing tough regulatory
reforms on the financial industry, which brought the economy to ruin.
We can imagine the troops coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan
while U.S. representatives participate in a regional process that brings
peace and stability to the entire region.
In the current
political climate, the expansion of union rights becomes a real
Much the same can be said about winning a second
stimulus bill, and we sure need one, given the still-rising rate, and
likely long term persistence, of unemployment.
Isn’t it possible
in the Obama era to create millions of green jobs in manufacturing and
other sectors of the economy in tandem with an attack on global warming?
Can’t we envision taking new strides in the long journey for
racial and gender equality in this new era, marked at its beginning by
the election of the first African American to the presidency?
And isn’t the overhaul of the criminal justice and prison system -- a
system steeped in racism--– no longer pie-in-the sky, but something that
can be done in the foreseeable future?
All these things are
within reach now!
Am Not Naïve
brief statement of Barack Obama's last month seems every bit as risible
as Richard Nixon's "I am not a crook", after one reads the article on
the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Obama wrote for the student
newspaper his senior year at Columbia. The New York Times
article on Independence Day and seems to want to spin it as
a sign of the president's deep nature.
He railed against
discussions of "first- versus second-strike capabilities" that "suit the
military-industrial interests" with their "billion-dollar erector sets,"
and agitated for the elimination of global arsenals holding tens of
thousands of deadly warheads.
The student was Barack Obama, and
he was clearly trying to sort out his thoughts. In the conclusion, he
denounced "the twisted logic of which we are a part today" and praised
student efforts to realize "the possibility of a decent world." But his
article, "Breaking the War Mentality," which only recently has been
rediscovered, said little about how to achieve the utopian dream.
Unfortunately that sorting out process hasn't exactly progressed in
26 years. Obama's plans for a nuclear free world today are just as chock
full of high sounding rhetoric and wishful thinking and just as bereft
of details as they were when he was a senior at Columbia as to exactly
how one is to accomplish such a lofty goal in a world of rogue nations. Conveniently forgotten by The Times is that all the nuclear freeze
movement predictions Obama supported about the shape of the future were
wrong. Instead of leading to a nuclear Armageddon, the increases in
defense spending under Reagan led to the collapse of the Soviet Union
and the Eastern block.
Obama seems determined to continue to
pursue the policy goals he held as a student instead of learning from
two decades of subsequent real world events. What is even more
disturbing is how people like Richard Lugar continue to give Obama high
marks for "being a good listener" and a "serious student" as they
patronizingly give him a pass on the implementation of workable plans.
Most Americans outgrew their student mode shortly after they had
to earn a living for themselves in jobs that had more quantifiable
performance criteria than community organizing, Obama naive? Throw in
sophistic, jejune and purblind to everything isn't a neat fit into
ideological cubby holes that haven't change in two decades and you'll be
on the right track.
Frank Gaffney sums it up in
"If the implications were not so serious, the
discrepancy between Mr. Obama's plans and real-world conditions would be
hilarious," said Frank J. Gaffney Jr., a Reagan-era Pentagon official
who directs the Center for Security Policy, a private group in
Hospital Won't Back Obama
||The hospital in
Hawaii where Barack Obama claims he was born refuses to produce any
documentation -- or even confirm the claim -- without permission of
The Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and
Children in Honolulu has posted on its
letter on White House
stationery dated Jan. 24 in which Obama wrote, "As a beneficiary of the
excellence of Kapi'olani Medical Center -- the place of my birth -- I am
pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters."
Kristy Watanabe, the public relations specialist for the hospital
refused to confirm or deny the veracity of Obama's letter claiming he
was born at the hospital.
"Our comment to everyone who has been
calling is that federal law does not permit us to provide any more
details concerning information [about Obama's birth] without
authorization from Mr. Obama," Watanabe said.
Watanabe why the hospital did not contact Obama to ask for
authorization, especially given the number of phone calls the hospital
was receiving with the request, Watanabe said: "This is our response,
and we can't say anything more than that."
asked if a hypothetical elected official pretended to be born at the
hospital, would federal law prevent her from disclosing that? If so,
which federal law would that be?
"It's just our policy that
without permission we don't ever answer questions about babies born in
the hospital," she said.
This is not the first time Kapi'olani
and other Hawaiian hospitals have slammed the door on attempts to
ascertain specifics about Obama's birth.
A Threat To Freedom
||Jumping in Pools blog
says that most liberals believe that national security is a threat to
freedom, when in reality national security, is the first & last
defense for freedom for the United States, and in most cases the
entire world. The national security of America is above and beyond
almost every other nation on earth.
We have to thank our great servicemen,
generals, Commanders in Chief (some, not all), and the Founders of this
nation, among other things.
We have defeated tyranny, fascism,
terrorism, socialism, Marxism, communism, radicalism, etc. over the
timeline of 233 years as a nation. We have become the superpower of the
world, not through force, but through our Constitution of Freedom. All
we fight for and represent is freedom.
That is sadly beginning to
be destroyed by emperor Obama.
When given the chance to stand
strong for freedom in Iran, he ignored them.
When given the chance to
stand strong for freedom and constitution in Honduras, he supported the
• When given the chance to stand strong for American values
overseas on numerous trips, he called us arrogant.
Obama has also
ignored the grave threat of North Korea and an Iranian nuclear program
-- which he actually gave his blessing to. He has cut our defense
budget, and is specifically targeting "missle defense" and the F-22
fighter. I guess the US Air Force is no longer needed.
He is putting
us at risk by wanting to allow terrorists free in America, and has sent
them to various nations with bribes, when we could just keep them at Gitmo for
less money, and a lower threat of another attack
Worst of all, Obama has destroyed our alliance
with Israel, and has even ignored and insultedthe British -- our
Now, Obama is
meeting with the Russians, attempting to reach another "nuclear arms"
treaty, that could include the elimination of American nukes. That would be a travesty, as America should always have
nuclear weapons. It is the forces of
evil that must have no nuclear devices.
When faced with the
threat that the Senate would not approve this treaty, Obama's people
said they would ignore the US Constitution (next item).
Obama's national security is appeasement, it is weakening our
military, it is weakening our alliances with the forces of good in the
world, it is ignoring dangerous threats, and directly standing for
dictators -- it is a threat to America's Freedom.
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved