Due To Lack Of Certified
Constitutional Eligibility
New analysis of
Democrat Party's official 2008 Certification of
Nomination for Obama reveals that reasons for his
sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 was to visit
more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian
election laws and post-dated documents reveal he may
have attended a hearing with Hawaiian Chief
Elections Officer regarding his disqualification
from ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional
eligibility.
Honolulu, Hawaii
At the center of the war over Barack
Obama’s illegitimacy as president are a series of
deep seated, unanswered questions about the detailed
involvement of several municipal employees and
officials within the government of the State of
Hawaii. From former governor, Linda Lingle’s
convenient deniability to former Health Department
director, Chiyome Fukino’s intentionally misleading
statements about Obama’s vital records. From
the blatant, dismissive ignorance of Hawaii’s
legislature about the difference between "U.S.
Citizenship" and "Natural-born citizenship",
to the claims by a former Honolulu senior elections
office clerk that the State of Hawaii does not
possess an original, 1961 Certificate of Live
Birth for Barack Obama, the State of Hawaii has
emerged as the primary, perhaps unwitting,
co-conspirator in keeping Obama’s identity a well
kept secret from the American people.
Now, however, a new investigation of Hawaii’s
Election Commission and the laws used by the state’s
Office of Elections to approve or deny candidates
for inclusion on presidential ballots raises
shocking revelations about the administrative power
held by too few unaccountable people and their
capacity to override the U.S. Constitution.
The evidence reveals that municipal agents, working
within the jurisdiction of Hawaii state law and
complex administrative rules, opened shadowy legal
channels which, ultimately, enabled Obama with an
opportunity to usurp presidential power and assault
the Constitutional sovereignty of the American
people.
Setting The Stage
The details of the
following account seem somewhat daunting, and even
overly exhaustive. However, it is more
important to remember that Obama's agents engaged
the prerequisites of his illegitimacy with
exhaustive investigation and extreme premeditation
long before they pushed him onto his present stage.
They looked at all the angles. They weighed
all the consequences. They engaged all the
legal provisions, and how to "bend", but not break,
them. The evidence reveals they may have even
pushed too hard on the limits of lawful conduct.
If those seeking the truth about Obama's
identity are not equal to that same diligence, then
they should question their understanding of the
importance of constitutional sovereignty.
Remember, among the primary objectives of liberal
globalists, in concealing Obama's identity and,
ultimately, his illegitimacy, were to endow
political power to a like-minded, radical agent who
would be willing to "push" extreme doctrine enabling
the governmental confiscation of advanced American
individualism. Or, should we simply consider
the massive five TRILLION dollars of added
indebtedness upon our children and grandchildren
since 2006 the cost of being American?
Obama was tactically positioned not to make
America a better nation for all of its citizens, but
rather to confiscate the value of America's
superior, prosperous heritage and redistribute it to
those he and the liberal establishment believes are
more deserving of it. Obama's desire for
economic equality is motivated by communistic
values. However, since communism cannot
succeed in America, the neo-liberal establishment is
exploiting the executive powers usurped by Obama to
enact "punitive" legislation which, essentially,
redirects money from vintage American society into
an epic liberal cause sought since the end of World
War II. Two generations ago, the American
people sought to prosper from their work. Now,
under Obama, the definition of a new "American
Dream" has been hijacked by those lusting to make a
profit by defaming the prosperity and sacrifice of
coming generations.
Therefore, our momentary visit into the realm of
plausibility serves well the value of our new
found lessons and reinforces the importance for the
American people to seize responsibility and
proactively protect the sovereignty of their
blood-ransomed, Constitutional freedom.
Sometimes, in order to accomplish this, we must
vigorously deny access to those with plural, or
ambiguous, allegiances. Otherwise, we should
resign ourselves to the idea that our value as the
last hope for humanity can never be defended or
preserved. Unless of course, we are willing to
cast out the peddlers of corrupt ideas.
Expulsion is an essential first step in
physically removing foul influences which undermine
the intended goodness of our founders. This
starts by identifying and exposing the components of
corruption by members of our ruling class. The
following report is just one of many authored by
other Americans which attempts, in small part, to do
this.
Pen Johannson
says the "Certificate of Live Birth" reveals the strange morphology
of Obama's adaptive identity, and that strange days continue as Obama
suddenly decides, with the 2012 election looming, that Donald Trump and
so-called "Birthers" are legitimately damaging his re-election bid with
valid questions about his eligibility, and permits the much maligned
Department of Health in the State of Hawaii to release another digitized
image of another alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth", adding an
attending, now conveniently deceased, doctor's name, a previously
unidentified local registrar, and the name of the hospital he declared
as his birthplace to the hollow saga of thin information about his
identity.
So, Donald Trump and the so called "Birthers" were
right. There was another document hiding in Hawaii. Imagine that.
However, the biggest question everyone is asking about Obama's
sudden and shocking capitulation in releasing a copy of an alleged 1961
"Certificate of Live Birth" is, "Why now?"
If the American people
are victorious in reclaiming and maintaining their Constitutional
sovereignty in the face of Obama's epic deception, it will be because
they have come to understand the undeniable truth about our founder's
definition of a natural-born citizen, not only as it applies to the
eligibility of a Presidential candidate, but how it applies to them!
Unfortunately, it appears, as American society declines into tragic
plurality and pathetic political correctness, it has abandoned the very
foundations established by ancient wisdom which made America the last
bastion of hope for humanity among a world on the road to Perdition.
Natural-born citizenry is immutable. It does not change naturally
and it becomes law at the moment of its endowment upon the individual.
It is established outside of the ability of the individual to choose it
at their birth. It is established by natural circumstance which
never change unless the citizenship status of the individual is
artificially altered through man's legal process. Expatriation,
foreign adoption, criminal extradition, foreign birth and emigration are
the most common means by which an individual's natural born status ends.
Fleeing from the monarchal corruption of interallegiances, it was upon the ideal
of Natural-born citizenry which our founders sought to establish the
eligibility for being President of the most powerful, blessed,
prosperous civilization in human history.
Obama's eligibility
appears to be strangely adaptive, not immutable. His
qualifications seem to evolve after his birth, not be confirmatively
requisite at the time it occurred. His identity seems to mutate
with the ever changing demands of the politics-du-jour. Obama only
reveals the answers required by the Constitutional eligibility mandate
when "carnival barkers" threaten his hold on power or damage his
electable image.
How do we know Obama is a fraud? Because
a truly natural-born American citizen would never have to prove his
eligibility after the fact. The evidence would be mete at the time
it was demanded. If Obama were truly eligible to be president, no one
would have ever doubted it.
Instead, Barack Obama did not reveal any evidence
leading to a resolution about his covert identity for more than three
years. And, he only did it at this particular time because not doing it
was hurting his ability to get votes, not preserve the welfare of
America. Obama cares nothing about America. He only cares
what it can offer him and his brand of liberalism.
Let's
understand this. Barack Obama has been sitting on original documented
evidence supporting his long-doubted eligibility to hold the office of
the President even as Terry Lakin, a decorated, honored military veteran and physician of 18
years, who asked for this information more than a year ago, is now
sitting in prison for honorably attempting to uphold his oath to defend
the Constitution of the United States.
So, we are supposed to
embrace the revelation of a long-form birth certificate, which has
supposedly existed for 50 years and which Barack Obama knew about while
Lakin was pleading for it during his dutiful obligation to disobey
illegal orders from an illegitimate command structure, risking the
consequences thereof? Barack Obama had this information available to him
before Lakin was charged, yet he allowed Lakin to be imprisoned anyway?
For more than four years, 35 lawsuits, millions of blogs,
thousands of YouTube videos, thousands of hours of cable news
pontification, denial after denial, disparagement, violence, hatred,
anger, the imprisonment of an American hero, and, most injurious, a
global degradation of confidence in Barack Obama, he suddenly injects
another piece of evidence into the eligibility circumference.
Why now? The 2012 election comes to mind. A powerful billionaire comes
to mind, but the idea of Barack Obama actually doing this for the
purpose of upholding the blood-ransomed sovereignty and honor of the
U.S. Constitution somehow is just hard to believe. Ideologically driven
political animals like Obama can't even see the price paid by worthier
others for his current gig.
Keep in mind, the reason for
requesting the information on this document was to have access to the
facts about Obama's natal biography which could be investigated for the
ultimate purpose of ensuring that Obama's presidency upholds the
blood-ransomed sovereignty of the United States Constitution...not
trying to make a brash billionaire presidential candidate stop threating
Obama's fraudulent usurpation of power and stop asking questions about
his real eligibility.
Maybe Obama finally decided it was time to
validate the claims of so-called Birthers by responding with what they
requested, just to shut them up. Right? After all, everyone thought the
Birthers were on to something. Right?
The important document here
is the Constitution, right? Unfortunately, media shills for Obama
desperately want this transient presentation of another "official" birth
certificate to finally close the door.
Here are a few well placed
questions. Certainly Obama will answer them with same
straightforwardness as he has demonstrated with this newly presented,
transparent piece of evidence.
1. The official NVSD template of a blank federal
1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" issued by the U.S. Department of
Health has an Amendment Section provided below the signature section
near the bottom, in which information about medical or identity
alterations are placed when a record is updated after birth. For
example, a baby who is adopted by a different father will have an
amendment in this section with the date of the change. Why is this
section omitted from the image of Obama's "Certificate of Live
Birth"?
2. Why did Obama pay legal defense costs, whatever
the amount, to his lawyers at Perkins Coie to keep people from
seeing this? A band of Obama's lawyers swarmed into court rooms to
licentiously demand this document not be revealed? This is what they
didn't want people to know about? Really?
3. Recall, the
election laws of the state of Hawaii explicitly require that state's
party authorities to submit an Official Certification of Nomination
which specifically indicates that a candidate for placement on
Hawaii's presidential ballot must be "constitutionally eligible for
the office of the president". The 2008 Democrat Party of Hawaii's
(DPH) chairman, Brian Schatz, refused to certify Obama's
constitutional eligibility for placement on the Hawaiian ballot
because he, apparently, could not find this "Certificate of Live
Birth" document, even though it was allegedly available in a
building adjacent to the election commission's office. Instead, the
national Democratic National Convention, headed by Nancy Pelosi,
circumvented the jurisdiction of the DPH and declared Obama
constitutionally eligible, apparently without this document!
Therefore, if this document has existed for 50 years, why was the
DPH denied access to it in August of 2008 prior to the filing of
that state's Official Certification of Nomination? If this document
was present in Hawaii, why was it not provided to that state's
Democrat Party authority as evidence in support of Obama's
constitutional eligibility? If this document has existed since 1961,
why did Brian Schatz and the DPH refuse to use it as evidence to
certify Obama's Constitutional eligibility for placement on the
Hawaiian ballot? Why could Mr. Schatz not find this document?
4. The liberal media and Obama's press corp have been telling
the world that the only official birth certificate issued by Hawaii
was the 2007 "CertificaTION of Live Birth" they sold us in 2008.
What purpose, then, does this "Certificate of Live Birth" document
serve if the "Certification of Live Birth" satisfies proof of
Natural-born eligibility? Weren't we all told that the initial cover
document was sufficient? Now, it appears Obama disagrees with his
defenders.
5. Why is the "Certificate of Live Birth" document
image presented with the same hatched, green-colored and patterned
background image as the other "only official birth certificate in
Hawaii", the 2007 Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth", posted on
Obama-friendly web sites in October, 2008? Is this another digital
image or an image of a direct copy? Has the original paper document
been released for examination?
6. Why is this document not
photostatic black like an actual copy would have been from the
hospital in 1961? Is this an image of the document filed by that
hospital?
7. How did Governor Abercrombie miss this document
during his search for it weeks ago? Is this the entirety of the
complete documentation of Obama's natal records held in the state of
Hawaii by all agencies, medical facilities and their personnel?
8. If this document is a copied original from the Hawaiian
Department of Health, will Kapiolani release their "exact copy"
version for comparison and verification? The two documents should be
an exact match.
9. If Obama was born in the same hospital as
the Nordyke twins only a few hours earlier, why is the local
registrar's name different on Obama's alleged "Certificate of Live
Birth"? Wouldn't the same registrar attest to both of these birth
registrations if they occurred within the same Hawaiian Vital
Statistics Office? Was Obama's birth registered in a different
location than the Nordyke twins?
10. As an "original" 1961
document, why does the registrar at that time allow the term
"African" to be transcribed onto the document knowing that no such
term prescribed by the U.S. Department of Health is allowed for
official natal data reporting to the National Vital Statistics
Division of the U.S. Department of Health? The appearance of the
term "African" on the 2007 Hawaiian 'Certification of Live Birth'
was excused as a benign inclusion without explanation by the
registrant, but that doesn't explain how an originating official
allowed this ambiguous reference to the identity of Obama's alleged
father. What is the officially defined identity of Obama's parents?
11. Why is there a strange blended, hatch-green border matching
the document body, encasing and around the limits of the
"Certificate of Live Birth" image, as if the document image was
imposed on a digital template background, like the bogus,
counterfeit 'Certification of Live Birth' was shown to have? Why not
just copy the original document and release it? Why "process" the
image with digital "treatments" first?
12. Why does the image
appear to 'break away' at the left margin as if to roll away from
the scanning device, revealing other documented information adjacent
to the contents of the "Certificate of Live Birth"? What is this
other information to the left?
13. If we assume the same
individuals were in their respective positions in 1961, Leo
Bernstein was the Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health and
Charles Bennett was the Deputy Registrar. Where is the embossed
stamp of the State of Hawaii along with the required signatures of
this Director of the Dept. of Health and this Deputy Registrar?
Notably, their signatures would exist inside the aforementioned,
omitted 'Amendment Section'.
14. The attending physician
identified in the document as David Sinclair, who allegedly signed
this document with a black filament pen, is dead, adding yet another
of more than 20 people who might have witnessed Obama's birth but
whom are now conveniently dead. Are there any other individuals
alive today who saw this guy's birth?
15. If this document
always existed, why did Obama not provide it to prevent the
imprisonment of Terry Lakin, the passage of state elibility bills
and the publication of multiple blogs, books and articles?
16. Why did Obama allow these doubts to exist so long in the
consciousness of the people he is supposed to instill confidence in?
Was it a game of "political gotcha", and if so, is that the kind of
man we want to be the leader of a nation? Who votes for a lying,
dishonest, game-playing conspirator with an agenda to string along
his country in order to merely attempt to make his political
opposition look like fools and ridicule them? Who wins that game?
How does this "unify" a nation? This does not gain peace. This is
how wars begin. This does not preserve the relationship of trust
between a people and their chosen leaders. This is how politicians
are eradicated and disposed of.
17. One document down. 21 to
go. Let's move on to the Columbia transcripts, shall we?
If this settles the question of the birth location,
Obama's alleged father was not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born and
Obama's citizenship status while residing in Indonesia remains a
mystery...so we continue to wait for a verdict on his legitimacy as a
natural-born president.
Let's just allow this cook for awhile
before making conclusions. If it accurately and authentically confirms
the entire roster of Obama's bizarre natal biography, excellent. It's
about time.
However, history has proven that Obama does nothing
without a calculated political benefit in mind. The man is incapable of
imagining himself unqualified for anything. He is a notorious, radical
power monger who desires Perdition for anyone who questions his
qualifications. He is not gracious. He is not merciful. He is not
honorable. He is not kind. He is intelligent, vengeful, proud, divisive
and corrupt. Therefore, there is no reason to think this new seed of
information is provided for any other reason that to advance his
fraudulent image for political reasons in the coming election cycle.
Tragically, now, he's added two more unwitting strangers to his covert
saga who, by the way, are not available to answer questions about their
role in this strange man's natal history. Suprise, suprise.
We've waited for four years for Obama to come clean...we can
wait as long as it takes to confirm this new evidence.
When the
truth is on your side, there is no fear of eternity. Obama appears to be
afraid of 2012.
