|
You're
missing the point.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mischaracterizing The Eligibility Issue |
V. Harlow says the
eligibility issue has constantly been mischaracterized as a
"citizenship" issue, or a "birth certificate" issue, and major media
outlets keep playing on this same theme over and over, ridiculing those
who want the truth.
I suspect they are partially driven by fear.
Fear they won't get interviews, fear they won't get invitations, fear
they won't get to cover important issues if this issue is included in
what they cover. Even Fox News continues to ridicule and
mischaracterize this very important Constitutional issue.
Can we
attack this administration on other valid issues? Yes, of course.
I don't advocate doing anything less. It's not right to push the
very valid and important Constitutional issue of the eligibility of the
current resident of White House to hold the job, aside as though it is
of no matter. There have been people scoffing for over a year now,
yet lawsuits continue. The issue is law. The highest office
in the land, the one responsible for upholding our laws and protecting
our freedoms is the issue.
Most reasonable people don't question
the "citizenship" of Obama. The Constitution has special
requirements for holders of the office of President of the Unite States.
Those requirements are "natural born citizen." That is a higher
standard than "citizen." It is a higher standard than "native
citizen."
Some people signed off on Obama's qualification rather
cavalierly either knowingly or carelessly. They need to be held to
account.
It's easy to ridicule and destroy the reputations and
careers of people fighting this battle, but it's wrong. Orly Taitz,
no matter how one questions her professionalism, does not deserve the
treatment she has received from anonymous callers, from malicious
supporters of Obama, or from major media outlets. She comes
willing and determined to defend our Constitution, while so many charged
with that responsibility have forsaken it completely.
Donofrio,
Pidgeon, Berg, Kreep, and others fighting the battle do not deserve the
ridicule. The American People overwhelmingly want to know the
truth.
An honest hearing is required.
That's all I've been seeking for
almost two years. |
| "We Gotta Have Proof" |
Attorney
General Ken Cuccinelli, fresh off the controversy that he generated with
his letter to Virginia public colleges and universities earlier this
month advising them against going too far in policies protecting gays
and lesbians from discrimination on campus, is back in the hot seat
again, this time over comments from late last year questioning Obama’s
citizenship.
The comments came to light in a posting on the
left-wing political blog Not Larry Sabato on Monday that included audio
from an interview conducted by an unnamed man of Cuccinelli in the
post-election transition period.
In the interview, the man asks
Cuccinelli what can be done "about Obama and the birth-certificate
thing." Cuccinelli responds that he thinks the question of Obama’s
citizenship that has been a cause celebre for the far, far right dating
back to the 2008 presidential election, "will get tested, in my view,
when someone -- when he signs a law, and someone is convicted of
violating it, and one of their defenses will be, 'It's not a law because
someone qualified to be president didn’t sign it.'"
The
interviewer then interjects that the issue would be that, "we are
talking about the possibility that he was not born in America,"
referring to Obama. "Right," answers Cuccinelli. "But at the same
time under Rule 11, Federal Rule 11, we gotta have proof of it."
Later in the exchange, Cuccinelli says it is not "beyond the realm of
possibility" that Obama was born in Kenya, as has been suggested
consistently by far-right partisans.
Cuccinelli told the
Washington Post in a statement on the matter released on Monday that he
"absolutely believe(s)" that Obama was born in America.
"I don’t
buy into the claims that he wasn’t," Cuccinelli said.
This item is posted to demonstrate
how the "eligibility" issue is confused with citizenship. They are
two different issues. Obama is a "citizen by statute."
Accept that. However, he remains ineligible to serve as CiC
because of the facts of his birth. His alleged father was a Kenyan
citizen, and a subject of Great Britain. At birth, this status was
conveyed to Obama. A
fact he admits to on his own website.
When you have
this discussion with your friends and associates, be very careful to
separate eligibility from citizenship, and be prepared to discuss
"statutory
citizenship" v. eligibility.
As an aside, see how the writer
opens his piece with a pejorative paragraph completely unrelated to the
subject he addresses. |
|
See How The Obots Spin |
Let's take a look at how Dan Nowicki, The Arizona
Republic's award-winning national political reporter spins the above
item.
He begins with, "Brown pressed
Hayworth as to whether he was 'comfortable with the fact that (Obama is)
an American citizen.'"
Nowicki frames his interpretation
of the facts as being a citizenship issue, when he knows it's an
eligibility issue, which he demonstrates when he continues:
"The Constitution requires that the president be a
natural-born citizen..."
That's the Obot two-step -- conflating
eligibility and citizenship -- muddying the water, right up front -- and here comes the spin:
"...which is widely viewed
as meaning he must be born in the United States..."
A view
not held by the Chairman of the Senate Judiiciary Committee, Patrick
Leahy, and senators McKaskill, Coburn, Clinton, Webb, and, oh yes --
Barack Obama.
Their formal view is that John McCain, a child born of American
parents, was a "natural born" citizen. Homeland Security Secretary
Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal judge, agreed.
"...Obama was born Aug. 4, 1961, in Hawaii."
So, here's how it worked in 2008 -- when Obots addressed Obama's
eligibility, they talk about Hawaii -- "...Obama was born Aug. 4,
1961, in Hawaii"-- they don't want to talk about the
implications of the fact that his
father was a foreigner.
When addressing McCain, it's parentage -- said Sen. Leahy,
"Because he was born to American citizens...McCain is a natural born
citizen" -- even though McCain was
born in a foreign
country -- there's problems there too.
Fact is, both Obama and McCain were ineligible and
everybody knew it. That's why there was no outcry then, and why
there's no outcry now. Think about it, Congress, the judiciary,
and all those campaign types, the lobbyists, and the rest of them --
they're almost all lawyers -- they know that Barack Obama is currently
usurping the office -- they were intimidated by the spectre of "riots in
the cities" and the need to go along.
Nowicki couldn't just close
his propaganda piece without throwing a shot at the "birthers"
-- small "b"
"During the presidential race,
Obama's campaign produced the Hawaii-issued short-form birth
certificate, but fringe Obama critics, dubbed "birthers," continue to
demand to see his long-form birth certificate."
It's not
just about a bogus birth certificate that
has been exposed by four competent
examiners as a counterfeit -- there's a whole bunch of stuff Obama
is hiding from the American
People -- and you're wrong about that
fringe thing too.
The facts of the interview are the facts.
Nowicki's interpretation of them are classic propaganda. |
| Eric Cantor: Obama Is A Citizen |
Salon
is reporting the new Republican House majority leader says he
doesn’t think questions about Barack Obama’s citizenship should play a
role in the discussion of policy matters.
Agreed. Those questions ought
to about Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
They are two separate and distinct issues.
Two years
into the Obama administration, so-called Birthers continue to argue that
Obama isn’t a "natural-born" citizen and that he hasn’t proved he’s
constitutionally qualified to be president.
Obama HAS NOT proved he’s
constitutionally qualified to be president. That's a fact.
What does Salon think this discussion is about? A CNN poll has
shown that 60% of Americans have issues with Obama's story.
Birth records in Hawaii haven’t dissuaded them.
There are no birth records, just
something "written down." Abercrombie's words.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor says he believes Obama is a citizen
and that most Americans are beyond that question.
That's Cantor's way of "evading the
issue." They're all doing it. This is the world's most
dangerous game of "hot potato." Nobody wants to touch
it.
They all know there are "issues." It's
in the news and on TV every day now. Jay Leno and SNL even
ridicule Obama and his story.
Appearing Sunday on
NBC’s "Meet the Press," Cantor refused to call people who question
Obama’s citizenship "crazy," saying it’s not nice to call anyone crazy.
Isn't that nice of him.
Cantor says he believes that Obama wants what’s best for the country
and that there are honest disagreements over how to achieve that.
I don't believe Cantor believes
that Obama wants what’s best for the country for an instant. If
Cantor thought Obama was doing what’s best for the country he wouldn't
have
sponsored
H.R. 2, "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act."
Nobody's
going to touch this as long as Obama occupies the Oval Office.
This is like "The Emperors New Clothes" in real life. When it
comes to eligibility, Obama is bare-assed naked, and no one dares to
speak out.
Look at what has happened to the ones that have tried.
Some have been humiliated. Some have been broken and jailed.
Despite the merciless attacks on Americans who question Obama's
eligibility by the media and the Left, the whispers became a murmur, and
the murmur became a roar.
The eligibility issue is now "main
stream" and the only one to put it to rest is Obama, and the only way he
can do that is to release ALL of
the normal and usual records documenting who he is, where he came
from, and who sent him. |
| |

©
Copyright Beckwith 2010 - 2011
All right reserved
|