Was There A Deal?

Custom Search

  

  

Obama and McCain
 



help fight the media
  
 

 

 

 

 
These items are archived in chronological order and is evolving -- there's a lot of stuff in the archive that relates . . .
Why Is John McCain Defending His Opponent?


McCain: "You Do Not Have To Be Scared" of Obama as President  (00:15)
  
The Deal
The Republican Party is complicit in Obama’s coup d'état.  They became a party to the conspiracy, and the Democrats compromised the Republican candidate when Leahy and company "resolved" that John McCain was/is a "natural born" citizen.  He isn’t, and was/is equally ineligible to serve as CiC.

The Democrats neutered McCain who never said a word about Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Alice Palmer, and the rest of the communists, socialists, black nationalists, and other assorted dirtbags that form Obama’s closest and longest lasting relationships and associations.

Most members of Congress are attorneys.  The judges too.  They all studied the Constitution.  They know the law (at least enough to pass the bar).  They know Obama is ineligible, but they made a deal with the devil and now have to live with it.
It Started In 2006
Many new-left academics believe being a "natural born" citizen is a relic, including Obama law firm associate Sarah Herlihy, who wrote a brief, "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement," for Chicago-Kent Law Review in 2006.   Cass Sunstein, Thomas Friedman, Barney Frank, a phalanx of Obama supporters are cited.
Claire McCaskill On Board Early
McCaskill wasted no time establishing herself in Congress after her 2006 election victory, challenging the Democratic leadership on issues such as earmarks and hitching her star to the Democratic Party’s new standard-bearer, Barack Obama.

Obama And McCain Both Have A Problem

In early 2008, the McCain and Obama campaigns recognized there might be a problem with their candidate's eligibility.  McCain was born in a foreign country, and Obama's father was a foreign alien, and a temporary visitor to the United States on a student visa.  Hillary, still in the campaign, was slowly being edged to the side by the Democratic Party power-brokers.

McCaskill Tries To Change The Rules

On February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration.  That bill was known as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act.  The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).

 

Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a "natural born citizen" and hence; the entitlement to run for President of the United States.  This bill met the same fate that similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past.

 

Within only five short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen. Claire McCaskill back again, making another attempt with Senate Resolution 511.  On April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a "natural born citizen" in defiance of the Constitution.  Curiously, it contained the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Leahy Says Two US Citizen Parents -- And Obama Agrees
On April 10, 2008, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was a "natural born" Citizen, as specified in the Constitution and eligible to run for president.  Sen. McCaskill knew Obama was not a U.S. Citizen, that’s why she introduced this bill -- dressing it up to look like it was in Sen. John McCain's cause.

It was during the bill's hearing that Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made the following statement:
   

"Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen," said Leahy.  "I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate."

At a Judiciary Committee hearing on April 3, Leahy asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal judge, if he had doubts that McCain was eligible to serve as President.

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are
born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff replied.

"That is mine, too," said Leahy.

    
What's interesting here is that Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary, confirms that a "natural born" citizen is the child of American citizen parents.

Parents -- that's two. That's BOTH parents.

Every time the words, "citizen" and "parent," are used by Sen. Leahy and Sec. Chertoff, the plural case, "citizens" and "parents," is used.  The plural case is the operative case.

It is Sen. Leahy's opinion -- his own recorded words, in a formal Senate Resolution and on his U. S. Senate website -- that Barack Obama is not a "natural born" citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief, regardless of his birthplace.

Obama had one American parent --singular -- his mother.  His father was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain.

Obama, himself, "at birth," was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain -- he
says so on his own campaign website.  This fact introduces the concept of "divided loyalties," -- the reason the founders created the eligibility requirement in the first place -- a fact that further underlines Obama's ineligibility.

The
source of this information is Sen. Leahy's own website.  The webpage contains a statement about the resolution; the resolution, itself; the Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); and an excerpt of Sec. Chertoff's testimony.

The plural word "parents" is used four times.  When used to identify the parents, the word "citizens" is used five times.  That's nine times that Sen. Leahy, on his own website describes the eligibility requirement.  There is NO PLACE in any of these four documents where the singular case of "parent" or "citizen" is used.
Did Republicans Purposely Run An Ineligible Candidate?
John F. Sweeney says, that in discussions concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barrack Hussein Obama II for the office of President of the United States, many point out that if there were a real issue, the Republicans would have leveraged it in 2008 to retain control of the White House.  But it was well-documented at the time, and additional documentation and analysis have established, that John McCain’s eligibility was in question as well.  With that being the case, why would the Republicans nominate a candidate who might not be constitutionally eligible to serve in the office?

The answer may be a simple one -- the 2008 race was going to the Democrats and the Republicans did not want a leading candidate for 2012 to lose or be roughed up during the campaign.  So the solution -- let the man who needed to win in 2008, if he was ever going to be president, run -- even if he might not be constitutionally eligible.  Was this a grand conspiracy by the Republican Party?  No, it was just simple pragmatic political strategy.

The Republicans had few things going for them in 2007 and 2008.  They had lost the Congress in the 2006 elections, and they had a president who was losing popularity as an unpopular war dragged on.  Even if things had been going relatively well, history was against a third straight term in the White House.  Since 1953, only once had the White House been occupied by a party more than eight consecutive years, and that was when George H. Bush rode Ronald Reagan’s popularity to take the 1988 election.  Clearly, 2008 was not like 1988, and it was unlikely the Republicans were going to keep the White House.  They knew it, and they knew it early.

So when John McCain showed some strength in the primaries, the other front-runners backed off.  They knew the odds of winning in 2008 were long.  So they avoided going into the 2008 Presidential buzz saw.  John McCain had no choice but to make a final and gallant run for the office.  The year 2008 was his last stand as a presidential candidate.  He was 71 years old.  No president has ever been elected for his first term after his 70th birthday.  Stories and articles were popping up about McCain’s age in 2008, and polls showed it was a negative factor.  If it was a negative issue at age 71 in 2008, it will be a killer issue in 2012 when John McCain will be 75 years old.

So for the Republican Party, the setup in the presidential race looked straightforward in 2008.  There was almost no chance to win, no matter who the nominee was.  So they nominated the only guy who cannot run in future races: John McCain.

Was the Republican Party aware of John McCain’s eligibility issue?  Of course it was.

Continue reading here . . .
 

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2010

All right reserved