Items on this page are archived in
chronological order . . .
Is It Fair To Say This Man Is A
Marxist?
Let's say a man was elected to the highest office in
the land who had
been mentored, during his childhood, by an avowed communist who was
identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (card number 47544) by the Commission on
Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii, accused by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) as being
active in several communist-front organizations, and had a
thick FBI file.
Let us further
say that this man's guardian, his grandfather,
had chosen this mentor for him, indicating that he was likely
sympathetic to the mentor's beliefs.
Now, let us say that upon
reaching college, this man
gravitated toward Marxist professors and revolutionaries and
attended the Socialist Scholars Conferences (SSC) at Cooper Union,
that featured the elite of socialist academia as well as union
activists, political revolutionaries, reformers, and opponents of
"corporate greed."
As a
"community organizer, this man
had an intimate and long-term association with
ACORN (Association
of Community Organizations for Reform Now), the largest radical group in
America and the publishers of a communist manifesto entitled "ACORN's
Peoples Platform" which would become
this man's agenda.
The New Party required candidates who received the endorsement sign a
pledge of support for the party that was, in effect, a front group for
communists. The July issue of the New Ground noted that 15% of the
New Party consisted of
DSA members and a good number of members of the
Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a democratic
socialist group in the United States which originated in 1991 as the
Committees of Correspondence, a moderate, dissenting wing of the
Communist Party USA.
Now, when this man ran for
national office, all of the above, which is really a snapshot of this
man's activities and associations, was forgotten, ignored and buried by
the media.
