Items on this page are archived in
order of discovery. Previous year in left column . . .
Obama Is Really A Revolutionary
The most radical US President -- ever! (07:09) -- YouTube
link
Dr. Richard L. Rubinstein, Yale fellow, "Distinguished Professor
of the Year", and Harvard Phd, states that Obama's intention
is to "correct the historical mistake of the creation of the state of
Israel." Dr. Rubenstein states that Obama due to his family
heritage is extremely pro Muslim -- to the point of "wanting to see the
destruction of Israel."
Barack Obama And The Democratic Socialists
Of America (DSA)
Trevor Loudon has documented Obama's relationship to
the DSA
here.
More Confirmation Of Obama's Socialism
J. Robert Smith says, make no mistake,
President Obama's "Socialist Realignment Strategy," the strategy Obama
and his cohorts are employing to impose socialism on an unwilling
majority, has the stuff of a coup -- a coup using legislative and
executive authority to ram through radical changes that empower
Washington politicians and bureaucrats as never before. Americans
have witnessed this strategy in action since Obama assumed power in
January of 2009. Stopping ObamaCare would be a critical practical
and symbolic victory in the war for freedom.
If ObamaCare and
Obama's other initiatives aren't stopped, then Obama and the left will
have severed many of the vital cords that connect the republic to its
founding. Americans will be less free, and less in charge of their
lives. The American experience will effectively end, and a
European socialized America will begin.
As Lord writes, the war
for the nation's heart and soul is now commencing in earnest.
Beginning today, Speaker-presumptive John Boehner and the House
Republican majority will be the frontlines in the fight to stop, then
rollback, Obama's and the left's attempt to radically transform an
unwilling nation. The coming fight will take enormous courage and
resolve; there can be no wavering in Republicans' commitment to
principles. Conservatives need to furnish the backbone.
The
stakes have been -- and are -- huge. America stands at a great
divide. Victory in the battles ahead will either reaffirm the
nation's commitment to the Founders' vision or largely scrap that
vision. Understanding and accepting Obama's socialist motives,
intent, and strategy are imperative to turning the tide and defeating
the left in the coming weeks and months.
Aaron Klein is reporting that A 1996 print
advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper shows Barack Obama was the
speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists
of America, the DSA.
The panelists at the 1996 DSA event included
Obama, then a candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; William
Julius Wilson, a longtime DSA activist from the Center for the Study of
Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson
from the University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, a member
of DSA’s National Political Committee.
According to the archive
of the DSA’s March-April 1996 newsletter, New Ground, Obama reportedly
addressed a crowd of over 300 people, discussing a theme from his
campaign, “What does it take to create productive communities?” Obama
reportedly outlined how government can play “constructive” roles in
bettering society.
Top Democratic Socialists of America members have been
closely linked for
years to Obama.
GOP Rep. Paul Broun (Ga.) rebuked Obama using
perhaps the sharpest language among his Republican colleagues following
the State of the Union address Tuesday night.
Broun took to
Twitter during the address,
accusing Obama of believing in socialism.
Like other members, Broun live-tweeted the address,
posting 40 times during the speech that lasted over an hour.
"Freezing spending at record high levels is not making tough decisions,"
he also tweeted.
Constitutional Contempt
Doug Hagmann says, this is the most difficult
report update I’ve ever filed on any investigative matter on which I’ve
worked, and certainly the most important. It strikes directly at
the heart of the national security of the United States, which has been
under attack from within for the last 75 years or longer. What
exists today began with people who are long dead, but whose agendas live
on through others to whom the torch has been passed. It is the
proverbial rabbit hole that goes deeper than most can fathom.
At
center stage stands Barack Hussein Obama, the man who currently holds
the highest office in the free world. He is the contemporaneous
result of decades of treasonous deceptions and socialist penetration
into our government that we were warned about by
Senator Joe McCarthy, a
man whose legacy has been deliberately rewritten so that the mere
mention of his name evokes undeserved revulsion by the majority of
people in America. Even though McCarthy has not been with us for
over 50 years, his investigative work as a U.S. senator figures
prominently into our current state of affairs.
Before you accuse
me of taking leave of my senses, I ask that you research the
declassified revelations of the 1990s that came about after the break-up
of the Soviet Union. Consider the documentation that was exposed,
such as the Venona
Papers, and other once classified yet still heavily redacted
documents released under the radar to be the predecessor of WikiLeaks.
Look carefully at what McCarthy was trying to warn Americans about, and
then analyze for yourself the well crafted
methodology of marginalization
through obfuscation used by those in power, those in the media, and even
many in Hollywood. You will find that what existed over 50 years
ago not only exists today, but has been magnificently refined.
The marginalization of McCarthy and the deliberate expunging of
historical records exposing the Marxist, Socialist and Communist
infiltration into nearly all levels of our government of that era
explains why we still find ourselves questioning not only the
eligibility status of our Barack Obama, but the majority of his
background. It is an undeniable fact that Barack Hussein Obama has
refused to provide authenticated evidence of his eligibility to occupy
our White House, the house of the American people. In fact, he has
fought the release of records that would prove, once and for all, this
most basic issue, and further
refused to release documents that would provide insight into
America’s most mysterious president.
The mystery behind Obama
extends well beyond the birth certificate controversy, although that has
grown into the most recognizable issue of late. For better or
worse relative to the truly important aspects of Obama, the actions and
behavior of Hawaiian Governor
Neil Abercrombie have fueled speculation among "Birthers,"
a pejorative term assigned to Americans who care about constitutional
issues and the rule of law. Over a half-century ago, it’s likely
that Birthers would have been referred to as "McCarthyites" instead.
The names have changes, but the template of marginalization is the same.
Students of history -- true history, not the revisionist type --
would do well to recall the communist infiltration of the U.S. State
Department and other federal agencies under the watch of Roosevelt and
Truman (and Obama).
History shows that they were aware of what was taking place, but for
reasons that are still applicable today, allowed the progression of
infiltration to continue. Like a game of geopolitical chess, wars
were fought under pretense while the coffers of the power elite hedged
their bets by financing all sides in these conflicts. Nation
building and the implementation of "fundamental change" of America was
underway long before Obama uttered that promise on which he is
delivering.
Andrew Cline says on Tuesday night, we, the
American People, were swindled by Obama, not merely out of cash, but out
of our most cherished national ideal: independence.
The deception
was deliberate. With all the charm he could muster, Obama, who
spent the last two years elongating the tentacles of the leviathan
delivered an aria of adoration for the symbol of global prosperity and
ingenuity: the American entrepreneur.
"At stake is whether new jobs and industries
take root in this country, or somewhere else. It's whether the
hard work and industry of our people is rewarded…the stock market
has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The
economy is growing again."
My god! Barack Obama is delivering Mitt
Romney's speech.
"No country has more successful companies,
or grants more patents to inventors and entrepreneurs…. What's more,
we are the first nation to be founded for the sake of an idea -- the
idea that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny…
We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the
world."
The man who bore the law that compels each of us to buy
health insurance says the very foundation of our nation is "the idea
that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny."
The incompatibility of Obama's signature legislative accomplishment with
what he identified on Tuesday night as the founding idea of our country
is as plain as the nose on George Washington's face. Obama's goal
on Tuesday: blur the line. Make the two seem closer than they
really are.
So he spoke with enthusiasm (summoning passion for
the topic was beyond even his considerable gifts) of America's
independent spirit, the father of our robust innovation culture.
"What we can do -- what America does better
than anyone else -- is spark the creativity and imagination of our
people. We're the nation that put cars in driveways and
computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers;
of Google and Facebook."
Yet just when it appears that this is a speech made in
tribute to the independent American entrepreneur, Obama reveals the real
hero: the state.
"Our free enterprise system is what drives
innovation. But [with Obama, there is always a "but"] because
it's not always profitable for companies to invest in basic
research, throughout our history, our government has provided
cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they
need. That's what planted the seeds for the Internet.
That's what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS.
Just think of all the good jobs -- from manufacturing to retail --
that have come from these breakthroughs."
Sam Blumenfeld says there can be no doubt that
Barack Hussein Obama is a deeply committed socialist intent on
destroying the American capitalist system and our Constitutional form of
government. Anyone who reads Stanley Kurtz’s new book,
Radical-in-Chief, will come away with that conviction. Kurtz
writes:
From his teenage years under the mentorship
of Frank Marshall Davis, to his socialist days at Occidental
College, to his life-transforming encounters at New York’s Socialist
Scholars Conferences, to his immersion in the stealthily socialist
community-organizer networks of Chicago, Barack Obama has lived in a
thoroughly socialist world….
At every turn, Obama has
disguised his socialist past, sometimes through grievous sins of
omission, sometimes through opaque and misleading
pseudo-confessions, and at other times through outright lies.
To say that Obama has lied about his past doesn’t quite do justice
to what’s been going on…. By hiding his core political
convictions, the president has systematically deceived the American
people.
Indeed, it was at the New York Socialist
Conferences that Obama learned why he had to become a skilled liar.
He learned in New York that if socialists were ever to achieve high
elective office, they would have to become stealth socialists, never
admitting to being socialists while promoting a socialist agenda.
Since most Americans don’t know the difference between liberalism,
progressivism and socialism, it would be quite easy to deceive the
electorate. And even after it became known that Obama had
connections with such notorious radicals as Bill Ayers and Jeremiah
Wright, he was able to deceive enough people so that he could ride to
the presidency on a white horse in the name of "change."
It is
interesting that after graduating from Columbia University, Obama first
got a job in a private firm that he hated, and then went to Chicago to
become a community organizer, a form of radical activism invented by
Saul Alinsky. The purpose of a community organizer is to turn
Americans into mobs that can be used by stealth socialists to intimidate
opponents to the socialist agenda.
Kurtz writes: "We’ve seen that
the favorite strategies of community organizers are designed to push the
country into socialism well before the public can figure out what’s
happened. Stealth-socialist community organizers habitually disguise
their long-term goals."
In Wisconsin we have witnessed
how the strategy works. Unionized teachers and government workers
are mobilized by community organizers to fill the state house with
screaming mobs. The teachers bring their students with them.
Apparently the students have not been taught anything about
constitutional government and believe that mobs are the appropriate way
to intimidate a conservative governor.
But why may Obama be
America’s Lenin? I believe that his commitment to socialism is so
deep and strong that he wants to go down in history as the greatest
single socialist in the pantheon of great socialists, along with Marx,
Engels, and Lenin. Lenin was able to impose communism on an
economically weak, politically backward nation, while Obama’s challenge
has been to take the greatest capitalist nation on earth and transform
it into a socialist society. What an achievement that would be in
socialist eyes!
In other words, I believe that Obama considers
himself to be clever enough to do the impossible: destroy American
capitalism and lead this nation into a socialist world government.
Wayne Allyn Root says that some are now
suggesting that Obama get involved in the NFL strike talks. I was
his college classmate at Columbia University and have studied his
political career for years. My record of predicting where Obama
will come down on the side of an issue and what lie he will tell to
rationalize his decision is near perfect. Just call me "The Obama
Whisperer."
Here’s a quick lesson in how he thinks:
First,
Obama is a Socialist who believes in the redistribution of wealth.
He hates those who have worked hard and earned money -- unless they give
him massive campaign contributions.
Second, he’s a union hack,
who will do anything for unions, even break the law and violate the
Constitution -- at least for those unions that give him massive campaign
contributions. Don’t believe me? Ask the shareholders and
banks that loaned billions to GM and Chrysler, only to see their
ownership and legal contracts erased by Obama in order to hand ownership
to the unions that destroyed the automakers in the first place.
Third, like a true Socialist, Obama believes government has the solution
to every problem, and that solution is more government and higher taxes,
combined with a prescription of social justice and affirmative action.
Based on his lifetime body of work, here is how I predict Obama will
settle the NFL labor crisis:
This "fact sheet," was posted on the White House website
yesterday -- "The President's Framework for Shared Prosperity and Shared
Fiscal Responsibility."
click
image for "fact sheet"
Hoft adds, This is "unreal. The White House
website is now inundated with Obama's Socialist filth. What a sad
day this is for this great nation."
And check out this
video. This guy doesn't even pretend that he's not a socialist
anymore. He's just out in the open with it.
"'There but for the grace of God go I,' we
say to ourselves, and so we contribute to programs like Medicare and
Social Security, which guarantee us health care and a measure of
basic income after a lifetime of hard work; unemployment insurance,
which protects us against unexpected job loss; and Medicaid, which
provides care for millions of seniors in nursing homes, poor
children, and those with disabilities," Obama said. "We are a
better country because of these commitments. I'll go further
-- we would not be a great country without those commitments."
And, NO!,
Obama. Everybody doesn't pay. In 2009, 47% of Americans
paid no federal income tax, and many of them received tax "rebates"
on the taxes they didn't pay. When that number gets to be 51%, the
takers will outnumber the earners, and America will be a distant memory.
Barack Obama's Arrogant Marxist Rhetoric
Ben Shapiro says that so far, the analysis of
Obama's deficit speech has focused largely on its vagaries,
obfuscations, and outright lies. Charles Krauthammer rightly
blasted Obama's speech as "shallow … hyper-partisan … intellectually
dishonest." He cited Obama's "numbers suspended in mid-air with
nothing under them with all kinds of goals and guidelines and triggers
that mean nothing." Krauthammer wasn't alone -- many commentators
ranging from David Limbaugh to Larry Kudlow have targeted Obama's
woefully un-mathematical statistics, his fiscal magical thinking, and
his utter inability to move to the center with regard to deficit
reduction.
But the true heart of Obama's speech wasn't the faulty
budgetary analysis or the demagoguery of attacking Paul Ryan personally.
It was Obama's soaring rhetoric.
Obama is an odd politician.
Most politicians see the cloudy phraseology of their speeches as mere
throwaway stuff, cotton candy for the simple-minded. Obama sees
such gibberish as the soul of his agenda. If we want to examine
where Obama truly stands, we must delve into his soaring rhetoric.
And the soaring rhetoric is unvaryingly drawn directly from
Saul Alinsky.
As Andrew
Breitbart makes clear in his fantastic new book, Righteous Indignation, the father of the
contemporary left is Saul Alinsky. Alinsky was an intensely clever
fellow with no compunction about exploiting popular sentiment to achieve
his ends. One of his favorite methodologies was to use America's
founders to back his own Marxism. As Breitbart writes, "Alinsky's clever
merging of fake founding philosophy with his own Marxism led him to
internal contradictions that would have sunk a lesser ego. While
championing 'freedom,' for example -- he hated the idea of individual
freedom the Founders loved -- he [pushed for] 'communal freedom,' which
is to say tyranny led by the government."
Obama was raised in the
Alinsky tradition, and he speaks with Alinsky's forked tongue. Thus, for
example, Obama opened his speech by stating that Americans have
historically "put our faith in free markets and free enterprise as the
engine of America's wealth and prosperity … we are rugged
individualists, a self-reliant people with a healthy skepticism of too
much government."
So far, so good. But Obama continues: "But
there has always been another thread running throughout our history -- a
belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can
only do together, as a nation." This is un-American, and it is a lie.
American unity doesn't occur in opposition to free markets, but in
defense of them.
This is typical Alinsky. By purposefully
confusing principled individualism with principled communitarianism,
suggesting that Americans are characterized by both, Obama begins the
slow march to fascism. In this section of his speech, Obama essentially
turned Americans into corporatists -- free marketeers ready, willing,
and able to turn over that free market to a well-organized state.
Michael Whipple
says
Blaming Americans for being "skittish" and "nervous" with a subtle
implication that its still all Bush's fault, Obama tries to tell
Americans that their task is to "not panic, not overreact."
Meanwhile his promised anti-energy policies, job killing ObamaCare, ever
increasing debt, failed stimulus, payoffs to union supporters and
Utopian "green" revolution are collapsing the US economy. But as
Alfred E. Newman said "What, me worry?"
Obama added more debt in
his first 19 months than all the presidents from Washington to Reagan
combined with the debt expected to double by 2021. The official
White House Office of Management and Budget web site carries a call from
Obama to "invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt,"
and yet Obama is giving future generations an insurmountable mountain of
debt. It makes sense when you understand Obama's goal of
redistribution of the wealth. Alan Greenspan said "Deficit
spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth." [Gold and
Economic Freedom; The Objectivist, 1966] To redistribute it you
must first confiscate it.
Just look at the ideologues Obama
chooses as his advisers. His cabinets are pushing "environmental
justice" as a scheme for redistributing wealth. His energy
secretary Steven Chu is on the record as having said we need higher gas
prices like those in Europe. Obama warned us during his 2008
campaign that "under my plan electricity rates will necessarily have to
skyrocket." Obama hired an anti-commerce commerce secretary in
John Bryson. Senator Inhofe has called Obama's EPA a "growing menace to
the economy." John P. Holdren, who then-President-elect Barack
Obama nominated as director of the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy in December 2008, called just five months before his
nomination for a global climate-change agreement that would allow wealth
to be redistributed from countries in the global "North" to countries in
the "South." Obama also picked a "spread the wealth" progressive
lawyer for his top economist.
A new congressional report has
determined that the Obama administration is intentionally causing high
gas prices. Obama seems to be doing everything he can to increase
gas prices, inhibit domestic oil drilling and ruin the coal industry.
His green energy policies cause consumers to pay as much as 38% more for
electricity.
And don't forget that according to Obama the union
agenda is his agenda. According to AFL-CIO boss Richard Trumka the
Obama White House collaborates with its socialist union boss on a daily
basis. Obama's payoff to the UAW for union campaign help cost
Americans over $14 billion and broke bankruptcy and credit laws possibly
destroying the ability of the auto industry to borrow in the open
market. Obama's heavily union biased labor board is suing Boeing
for building a plant and creating new jobs in South Carolina.
Its
no wonder that the head of 3M called Obama anti-business expressing
concerns about killing jobs and that the National Black Chamber of
Commerce founder said Obama "is anti-business...it's starting to look
Marxist to me." As more people realize Obama really is a socialist
they have a right to be skittish and nervous about his economy
destroying polices. After all, he's got the job for another two
years.
Obama And The End Of Western Civilization
Steve McCann says the global and domestic
landscape is one of turmoil, indecision, and uncertainty.
Everywhere one looks there is chaos and potential disaster, whether in
the financial, economic, or political sphere. Since the beginning
of the post-World War II era there has been one constant that has been
the stabilizing force in the world: the stature, power, and influence of
the United States. In a matter of a few short years Obama has
deliberately and overwhelmingly eroded America's pre-eminence, which has
resulted in global instability and domestic unease.
Barack Obama
occupies the office of the presidency as a man brought up and steeped in
1960's radicalism, which advanced the doctrine that America, as the lone
Western superpower, represented the evil nature of colonialism and
capitalism's exploitation of the masses -- whether there was any truth
in this assertion or that the United States was guilty of these sins was
irrelevant. The material and military success of America and the
West could only have come about from expropriating the wealth and labor
of the peoples of the world.
This is a simplistic and emotional
argument and one that refuses to take into account the basic nature of
the human race and its failings and foibles. Mankind always has
and always will have as its preeminent trait the need to survive, and to
that end human beings are susceptible to committing crimes and
exploiting their fellow man. Thus any society will always have
many failings, but the key measure of any civilization is what it does
to control those tendencies and strive for an equitable culture.
No nation or culture in history has done more to advance the well-being
of mankind than the United States and Western civilization.
However to the Marxist mindset of the radical left, only they, utilizing
the vehicle of a massive central government, could control mankind's
nature and create a fair society. It is the ideal philosophy for
those who, so enamored with themselves, can wallow in their
self-importance and rule with a heavy hand the same masses they claim to
protect. Under no circumstances, therefore, can these
revolutionaries defend or profess admiration for their country; instead
they must not only transform the United States into a villain, but
destroy any vestiges of its accomplishments in order to permanently
retain control over the populace and exact revenge for the alleged
transgressions of the West.
Barack Obama has spent his entire
life, from birth to the present, marinated in this mindset. He is
thus incapable of change or being receptive to any other viewpoint, as
that would be an admission of failure. His chief concern is
himself, the retention and expansion of government power as well as the
plight of the third world, rather than the suffering of the average
American citizen facing economic and societal ruin.
He and his
fellow-travelers can thus justify bankrupting the country as a necessary
part of the remaking and absolution of the United States. He can
show disdain and at times outright hostility toward age-old European
allies who were, in his mind, the original sinners in the exploitation
of the downtrodden. He has no compunction in forcing Israel, as an
outpost of Western civilization, to compromise and bend to all the
demands of the Palestinians. To Barack Obama there is no
overriding American interest in virtually all foreign matters except to
take a back seat and surrender its influence to other mainly non-Western
powers.
He continues to pursue many of George Bush's policies
against terrorism and the war in Afghanistan, while taking steps
designed to assure America does not win the conflict in the long-term.
His short-term goal is to be certain a terrorist attack within the
United States does not occur in the next two years as that would doom
his re-election chances and put in jeopardy his agenda. Meanwhile
he willingly discards old allies in the Middle East while turning a
blind eye and tacitly promoting the radicalization of many countries in
the region.
He relies on his ego-driven messianic demeanor and
skin color to intimidate both domestic political adversaries and
international allies, while believing the same traits will cause those
in the non-Western world to view him as their savior.
Sharon Sebastian says that Las Vegas mogul, Steve
Wynn, reportedly said the following about Barack Obama:
"This is Obama’s deal and it’s Obama that’s
responsible for this fear in America. The guy keeps making
speeches about redistribution. And, maybe we [the
administration] ought to do something to businesses that don't
invest, they’re holding too much money. We haven't heard that
kind of talk except from pure socialists. Everybody's afraid
of the government and there's no need soft-peddling it, it's the
truth. It is the truth! And that's true of Democratic
businessmen and Republican businessmen, and I am a Democratic
businessman and I support Harry Reid. I support Democrats and
Republicans. And, I'm telling you that the business community
in this country is frightened to death of the weird political
philosophy of the President of the United States. And until
he's gone, everybody's going to be sitting on their thumbs."
Is Wynn right? Is Obama a socialist threatening to "do
something to businesses" if they don’t toe the Obama line? Does
Obama reveal himself to be an ideologue with a Socialist/Marxist agenda?
How does a country know that socialism is being forced on its people by
its government? Do Obama’s policies reveal a deeply rooted problem
with socialism at its core?
Allow a resubmission of a partial
checklist, a jet tour of Obama and his Progressive governance.
Core to socialism is "redistribution of wealth," which is Obama’s
constant mantra (check). Government leaders assume an elitist
mentality and ignore the will of the majority of the people (check).
The government takes control of the majority of the nation’s economy by
nationalizing industries such as auto, insurance, banks and health care
and attacks free enterprise (check). Obama puts an
anti-free-market Czar over the nation’s vital manufacturing sector who
is quoted as saying -- "we know the free market is nonsense" (check).
Obama blurs the checks and balances between the executive and
legislative branches of government (check). Obama derides or
circumvents the Constitution that protects the people from tyranny at
the hands of the government (check). Obama advocates personally
invasive laws that will force compliance by citizens with the threat of
fines and legal penalties (ObamaCare/EPA -- check). The government
force-feeds laws before they are read, that allow the government to fill
in the blanks without oversight after the laws go into effect -- such as
the reported hundreds of incomplete mandates in ObamaCare and the FDA
(check). Obama and his czars threaten freedom of speech with an
agenda to control the citizen’s use of the Internet via an empowered
FCC, to shut-down opposition Radio-TV-Cable stations with massive
taxation, to continue to target groups "as the enemy" that peacefully
speak out against government and then direct radicals to "go get in the
face" of those who dissent peacefully (check, check, check, and check).
Related:Proof Obama’s Not a Real
Socialist -- he's a neo-Marxist.
Is Barack Obama Truly A Socialist?
Paul Roderick Gregory
says the Pew Research finds that sixty percent of Americans respond
negatively to "socialism." It is clear why Barack Obama must avoid that
label. Words are important. Political candidates who control the
language of political discourse win elections.
Most of our elites would certainly not entertain the question: "Is
Obama a Socialist?" Only irresponsible fanatics carelessly throw around
such epithets, they say. Polite circles ignore such goofiness.
As someone who has professionally studied and written about
comparative economics, capitalism, and socialism for almost fifty years,
the reticence to probe the core beliefs of a political leader seems odd.
The question is perfectly legitimate in both an academic and political
context as long as we define terms and place the discussion in proper
context.
By "socialist," I do not mean a Lenin, Castro, or Mao, but whether
Obama falls within the mainstream of contemporary socialism as
represented, for example, by Germany’s Social Democrats, French
Socialists, or Spain’s socialist-workers party?
Yes. It is true! Barack Obama, his close friend Al Sharpton,
Ronald Reagan, and the founding fathers all agree that Obama is a
socialist! a socialist utopia was the dream of Barack Obamas father,
and though he could not realize this dream himself, he is subverting
congress and destroying the balance of power that our Constitution
has so beautifully created, and enforcing socialism on the United
States of America.
From the numerous unelected czars, to the
many executive orders that he has passed, Obama is doing all that he
can to push his socialist takeover and destroy our very own
Constitution right before our eyes. Yes, Obama's socialism is
destroying our free markets as he picks winners and losers, launders
money to his ardent supporters through trillion dollar stimulus
packages. He has taken over much of the private sector with his
socialist health care takeover know affectionately as "ObamaCare"
and he is stifling growth and jobs as he joined hands with the
Communist Green Movement (avowed communist Van Jones worked in the
Obama White House).
True to his roots, Obama has surrounded
himself with radical Marxist individuals who think that the
Constitution is an outdated document, and that Karl Marx was right
and wealth redistribution works. As we have seen from history,
socialist and communist regimes have brought death and destruction
to their own people numbering in the hundreds of millions!
As Karl Marx himself said, "Democracy is the road to socialism" and
as we have seen socialism and communism are extremely similar and
have the same father- Karl Marx. We will let him tell you in his own
words how Obama is a Socialist!
