Custom Search





creeping Sharia



help fight the media




Items are archived randomly . . .
Creeping Sharia
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult.  It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, military, economic, and social components.  The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called “religious rights.”

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to “the reasonable” Muslim demands for their “religious rights,” they also get the other components under the table.

Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2010)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone.  In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States -- Muslim 0.6% (Dearborn, MI -- Muslim 40%)
Australia -- Muslim 1.7%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs and they begin to agitate for Sharia-compliance under the guise of "religious rights":

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will increase their demands for Sharia-compliance -- as an example they will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims.  They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply.


They will demonstrate for perceived insults to Islam, the Quran or Muhammad. (United Kingdom, United States).

France -- Muslim 5% - 10%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law.  The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings).  Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons).

France's run-down city suburbs have become "separate Islamic societies" cut off from the state.  Arab communities are increasingly rejecting French values and identity to immerse themselves in Muslim culture and lifestyle.  As a result, France -- whose five million Muslims make up Europe’s largest Islamic population -- was turning into a "divided nation," the study called Suburbs of the Republic found.

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 99.3%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 95%
Palestinian Territories -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%

Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%


Of course, that's not the case.  To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.


"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life.  It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world.  And all of us against the infidel.


Leon Uris, "The Haj"

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity.  Muslims do not integrate into the community at large.  Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.

The framework has been adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book:  Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.          
Silent Conquest -- The Movie

The end of freedom of expression in the west

  Click for full video
It's Like The Blob -- But It's Not Science Fiction

The most important video you'll ever watch
An Example Of Islamization (Detroit) reports that once again the thugs at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) demand that non-Muslims change their practices to conform to Islamic sensibilities, rather than calling upon Muslims in the United States to adapt to American culture.  Do they really expect anyone to believe that McDonald's didn't hire this woman because it is "Islamophobic"?  Their opposition to the hijab is, I am certain, entirely hygienic, and in a restaurant, that is something I am glad to see.

The Michigan Chapter of  (CAIR) is accusing McDonald's of religious and ethnic discrimination, and has filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint against a McDonald's Restaurant in Rochester Hills.  The complaint was filed on behalf of a Muslim woman who applied for a job at the restaurant.

During the interview, she says that one of the restaurant managers informed her that wearing an Islamic head scarf, or hijab, would be a problem.

In 2008, the EEOC issued new guidelines on accommodating religious beliefs and practices in the workplace.  The guidelines offer protection for workers who wear religious attire such as a headscarf.

"We urge McDonald's to take immediate action to bring its hiring policies into compliance with long-established legal guidelines on reasonable religious accommodation in the workplace," said CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid.  Walid noted that in 2008, CAIR-MI raised concerns with McDonald's regarding two similar incidents in which Muslim women alleged being denied employment because of hijab.
Words We Dare Not Speak
NewsMax is reporting that Rush Limbaugh used his radio program Wednesday to lash out against Obama’s plan to censor the word "Islamic radicalism" from a National Security document that deals with threats confronting America.

Obama advisers say the new version emphasizes that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism.

But the change is a radical shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war.  It currently states, "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."

Limbaugh, America’s number one rated conservative host, thinks the Obama initiative is dangerous.

On his show Limbaugh said:

"Obama and his idealists, young whippersnappers, think the United States is the problem.  We are attacked because we deserve to be.  We have been imperialists, we've overstepped our bounds in the world, it's totally understandable why they would attack us and commit acts of terror against us.  So what do we need to do?  We need to go in there and build them schools, and we need to get them health care, and we need to talk to them about science.  Meanwhile, we do not have the money for this."

"I ask a question?  Maybe somebody can help me with this.  What are we doing having relationships with the Muslim world anyway?  Do we have a relationship with the Catholic world?  Do we have a relationship with the Buddhist world?  Do we have a relationship with the Jewish world?  Well, if we did, Obama's taken care of that.  But we don't have relations with religious worlds."

"If we can't call Islamic radicals 'Islamic radicals,' we shouldn't call rapists "rapists."  We should call them 'uninvited perpetrators,' or 'penetrators,' if you wish.  Murderer?  Do you think people like being called a murderer, even if they are?  Do you think that's going to forge a decent relationship with murderers?"

"So the premise is we deserve it.  We should have been hit.  It's time we face the facts, and to prevent them from hitting us again, we have to acknowledge that.  Stop calling them Islamic radicals, stop calling them terrorists, instead build them hospitals.  I can't imagine what it must be like to be in a family who lost someone in 9/11 to hear about this guy's plans for the Muslim world.  I can't imagine what it was like when they found out that this government was willing to spend $200 million a year in security for the people who blew up the World Trade Center in a civil trial.  I can't imagine the anger they must have felt."

More Islamization From The White House says that a top official of the Obama Administration, tasked to improve ties with the Muslim world,  said that Indian Muslims are not terrorists, even as many of them are increasingly tired of being defined as such.

"I talk about the bloggers that I meet in India who are tired of Muslims being defined as terrorists," Indian-origin Farah Pandith, the US Special Representative to the Muslim Community, said in a web video chat on Saturday.

"They're getting out there and talking about what's happening in India, with 160 million Muslims in India -- all of whom, by the way, are not terrorists, excuse me," asserted the Indian-American Pandith, who has travelled to more than two dozen Muslim countries and those having sizeable Muslim population, said that the Obama Administration is reaching out to this community across the world to change the widely held negative view about Islam and terrorism.

"The narrative has to change by the conversations that we are having, and not to put everything in one big bucket, just because, obviously, somebody maybe of one faith that does something bad does not mean that everybody of that faith is in that same bucket," she said in response to a question, adding that Muslims are trying very hard to push away any kind of narrative that would give that impression.

"We as Muslims do not support the use of violence in any way, shape or form," she said.

"You have seen cross-cultural responses to Muslims and non-Muslims working together to push back against any kind of violence," Pandith said.  "We need to do more to engage and build dialogue.  And what this president has said is that it is a priority for us to engage Muslims around the world," she said.

"Overseas we're trying to build bridges that have been broken and also want to restore opportunities for dialogue.  We want to see where we can be more useful in partnering and building initiatives.  And that requires us to put especial effort, right at this moment in time, to develop new relationships.  So that's why we're doing this," Pandith said.

The Obama Administration official said the Muslim world is not monolith community, but very diverse.

"It's talking about diversity, and it's talking about things that this country stands for.  When we talk about the West, Muslims are part of the West.  There are 30 million Muslims in Western Europe.  There are millions of Muslims in America," she said, adding that this is not a zero-sum game.  "It's not us versus them.  It sort of debunks the entire Samuel Huntington theory of 'The Clash of Civilizations'."

It's not the West versus the East.  It's not America versus Islam.  Obama has talked very clearly about the fact that Islam is part of America," she said.

More Islamization from the White House -- "Obama has talked very clearly about the fact that Islam is part of America."

Islam and the American way of life can never co-exist.  It's impossible.  The two are water and oil.

We need to remember that Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult.  It is a complete system.  Islam has religious, social, dietary, legal, economic, political and military components.  The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

When Muslims agitate for their "religious rights," they are really agitating for you to accept their social, legal, economic, and political practices, customs and laws under the guise of religious rights.

And Pandith talks about diversity -- race?  maybe! -- but there is no diversity of thought in Islam.  There is no diversity of lifestyle.  There is no "pursuit of happiness" in Islam.  Islam dictates every aspect of the Mohammedan's life.

There certainly is no diversity of religion.  YOU can't even enter the cities of Mecca and Medina.  There are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia.  You can go to jail for possessing a Bible.  Saying there's diversity in Islam is a lie.

Even in America, living like a normal American can get you killed in Islam.  There is no freedom in Islam.  Islam is foreign to our way of life -- and you have to listen to that wailing five times a day -- every day.
Three Things About Islam

Three surprising things you should know about Islam  (08:10)  YouTube link
Islamization Of Paris -- A Warning To The West

Undercover video shows scenes from Paris that French leadership refuses to acknowledge  (06:53)
An ordinary French citizen who has been watching the Islamization of Paris decided that the world needed to see what was happening to his city.  He used a hidden camera to start posting videos on YouTube.  His life has been threatened and so he uses the alias of "Maxime Lepante."
AP Won’t Report Korans Being Burned
Memo sent to AP staff:

From: Kent, Tom
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:53 AM
Subject: Standards Center guidance: Planned Sept. 11 Quran burning


As you know, a group known as the Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Fla., has announced that it intends to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11.

In the runup to this event, we've seen a rush of stories, photos and video from points around the world.  Let's keep our coverage in proportion.  Although many are speculating on the effect the Quran burning could conceivably have, at the moment it's a proposal by a tiny group that may or may not happen.

We plan ONE main spot story on this issue a day.  The News Center will coordinate where this story will originate from.  Routine spot news -- for instance, comments about the plan by political or other public figures -- should be funneled to the point handling the main story.  We should avoid a profusion of separates beyond what any newspaper, website or broadcaster would actually use.  This includes stories, photos, audio and video that repeatedly make the same point, for or against the burning.  Consult the News Center if you have questions on this.

The concept of this planned event is offensive to many Muslims worldwide.

Continue reading here . . .

Mustn't offend Muslims -- meanwhile:

From the U. S. State Department -- Saudi Arabia -- "Standards of Conduct and Religious Police: Islam is the official religion of the country and pervades all aspects of life in Saudi Arabia.  Public display of non-Islamic religious articles such as crosses and Bibles is not permitted.  Travel to Makkah (Mecca) and Medina, the cities where the two holiest mosques of Islam are located, is forbidden to non-Muslims."

Almost all Muslim countries forbid the building of churches.  Many Muslim countries are burning them down as fast as they can find them.  We have permitted them to build thousands of new mosques here in the US -- some of them incubators of terror -- but that hasn't and won't change a damned thing over there.

Almost all Muslim countries forbid Muslims from converting to another religion under threat of death -- thousands of non-Muslims are allowed to convert to Islam here in the US -- but that hasn't and won't change a damned thing over there.

Christians and Jews are asked, "How would you like it if Muslims burned the Bible?"  Well, here's the problem: we haven't burned any Qurans for hundreds of years.  But in that same period Muslims have burned millions of bibles.  They still do it every day.  Our own military recently burned bibles, so as to not "offend" Muslims.

The truth is, it happens every day somewhere in the world.  Do you know why we don't hear of it here?  Two reasons:

1. The Liberal Media does not like reporting anything critical of Islam (recall the cowardice of our newspapers in not publishing the Danish Cartoons)

2.  If our newspapers had to print barbaric acts committed by Muslims on a daily basis there would be no room to print the local news.

In Saudi Arabia, Bibles are shredded.  People caught inside Saudi Arabia who have more than one Bible are arrested.  The penalty, lashing.  Saudi Arabia, ruled by Shariah law, laws based on the interpretation of the Koran.  The outrage from the Obama administration on the issue of the Saudi government confiscating Bibles owned by Christians, people arrested then sentenced to a public lashing: Zero, zilch, nada.

I have a single question for Barack Obama -- How can I respect a "religion" that holds as one of its basic tenets that I must submit to it or die?
Walid Shoebat On The Islamization Of The United States
Walid Shoebat, a convert from Islam to Christianity, speaks on the reality of the attempt to Islamize the United States of America.  You will learn a lot from this 3-part speech.  In particular, note his words that "Terrorism is not the explosion.  Terrorism is a political act."  Watch it, and then pass it on.

How Islamic Supremacism Is Overwhelming Democracy
Robert Spencer says that after 9/11, you may recall, the United States was going to bring democracy to the Islamic world.  Nine years later, we have Sharia Constitutions in both Iraq and Afghanistan.  A Shi'ite client of the Iranian mullahs rules shakily in Iraq, while in Afghanistan the U.S.-backed president is increasingly hostile to America and even threatens to join the Taliban that he was supposed to be fighting against.

But that isn't even the worst of it.  Paradoxically, instead of bringing democracy to the Islamic world, the years since 9/11 have seen only success after success in Islamic supremacist efforts to undermine democracy in the West.  Bending over backwards not to appear "anti-Muslim" in their anti-terror efforts, the U.S. and Western Europe have allowed in large numbers of Muslim immigrants who hold to a radically undemocratic political ideology, one that is rooted in Islamic texts and teachings and thus is not susceptible to negotiation, compromise, or the gentle pressure of "assimilation."

It has all happened quite quickly, and yet gradually enough to have generally escaped the notice of those who have been living through it.  Nonetheless, life in Western societies has already been utterly transformed, and more changes -- for the worse -- are certain to come.  In the elegiac, insightful and sweeping new book Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in the West, the American expatriate Abigail R. Esman, who now lives in the Netherlands, surveys the damage.

It's a profoundly moving, personal account of how the stealth jihad has advanced in the Netherlands over the last decade and more, written by someone who was in the center of it all.  Esman knew Theo van Gogh, murdered by Islamic jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri in 2004 for his film Submission about the plight of Muslim women, and was close friends with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the outspoken Somali ex-Muslim who served for a time in the Dutch Parliament and who collaborated with van Gogh on Submission, before death threats led her to flee the country.  She watched as Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn rose to international prominence for his opposition to unrestricted Muslim immigration and the Islamization of the Netherlands -- and then was murdered by a Dutchman who said he did it out of sympathy for the nation's Muslims.  Esman recalls: "There were those -- and I was one of them -- who thought Fortuyn was little more than a pretender, a narcissist with a big mouth and glib tongue who would quickly be exposed and then forgotten.  We were the most wrong of all."

Esman details the horror of the murder of van Gogh, the bloody triumphalist Islamic boasts of his murderer, the supine reaction of Dutch authorities, and the indifference of self-proclaimed moderate Muslims.  Noting their absence at a November 2005 memorial for van Gogh attended the Dutch prime minister and the mayor of Amsterdam, she writes: "Muslim moderates are part of 'us,' not 'them.'"  Yet when they should have been there, just to make that simple statement, to present that one gesture of solidarity, they were not.  And that they weren't makes me consider, on second thought, that maybe they aren't quite with us, after all."

But America has managed to assimilate its Muslim population much more successfully, hasn't it?  After surveying a number of jihad terror plots perpetrated by both Muslim immigrants and homegrown converts to Islam, Esman concludes that that bit of conventional wisdom, like so much else in the popular understanding of the jihad terror threat, is simply wrong.  Our freedoms are being eroded here no less unmistakably than they are being eroded in Europe.  The consequences of the folly of our government and law enforcement officials may be less obvious to the general public than it is in Europe, but in the age of Obama that is rapidly changing.

So what is to be done?  Must we choose between becoming an Islamic state or a totalitarian state imposed in the name of "security?"  Esman contends that it is not too late to save our free societies, if we firmly reject the suicidal philosophy of multiculturalism and take other steps she outlines in Radical State.  Radical State is a unique and powerful book because it brings to vivid life the human cost of the ongoing Islamization of Europe.  Already the massive importation of Islamic supremacists with nothing but contempt for European civilization and an intention to replace it with Sharia at the earliest opportunity has been a catastrophe of incalculable proportions for European societies.

Abigail Esman has lived through the worst of it, or the worst so far, and shows all the large and small ways in which our lives, our joys, our freedoms, are diminished.  If she is heeded now, it may not be too late to salvage at least some of what has made us so free and so alive for so long.

But that is a big "if."
Brooklyn, NY -- 6 AM
And, as Christmas trees are taken down, creches removed, and Santa Claus banned, we have this shiite!
Pamela Geller asks, "Aren't there nuisance laws, public ordinances, and disturbing the peace laws?  I mean, really.  This is harassment and attrition."

This is only the beginning.
The True Face Of Islam
This video is 6 minutes long, but it is a must watch.  If you don't have the time now, come back later.

These people will tell you what they want -- world-wide Shari'a -- all you have to do is listen to them.
Geert Wilders Speech At His "Heresy" Trial
The lights are going out all over Europe.  All over the continent where our culture flourished and where man created freedom, prosperity and civilization.  Everywhere the foundation of the West is under attack.

All over Europe the elites are acting as the protectors of an ideology that has been bent on destroying us since fourteen centuries.  An ideology that has sprung from the desert and that can produce only deserts because it does not give people freedom.  The Islamic Mozart, the Islamic Gerard Reve [a Dutch author], the Islamic Bill Gates; they do not exist because without freedom there is no creativity.  The ideology of Islam is especially noted for killing and oppression and can only produce societies that are backward and impoverished.  Surprisingly, the elites do not want to hear any criticism of this ideology.

My trial is not an isolated incident.  Only fools believe it is.  All over Europe multicultural elites are waging total war against their populations.  Their goal is to continue the strategy of mass-immigration, which will ultimately result in an Islamic Europe -- a Europe without freedom:  Eurabia.

The lights are going out all over Europe.  Anyone who thinks or speaks individually is at risk.  Freedom loving citizens who criticize Islam, or even merely suggest that there is a relationship between Islam and crime or honor killing, must suffer and are threatened or criminalized.  Those who speak the truth are in danger.

The lights are going out all over Europe.  Everywhere the Orwellian thought police are at work, on the lookout for thought crimes everywhere, casting the populace back within the confines where it is allowed to think.

This trial is not about me.  It is about something much greater.  Freedom of speech is not the property of those who happen to belong to the elites of a country.  It is an inalienable right, the birthright of our people.  For centuries battles have been fought for it, and now it is being sacrificed to please a totalitarian ideology.

Future generations will look back at this trial and wonder who was right.  Who defended freedom and who wanted to get rid of it.

The lights are going out all over Europe.  Our freedom is being restricted everywhere, so I repeat what I said here last year:

It is not only the privilege, but also the duty of free people -- and hence also my duty as a member of the Dutch Parliament -- to speak out against any ideology that threatens freedom.  Hence it is a right and a duty to speak the truth about the evil ideology that is called islam.  I hope that freedom of speech will emerge triumphant from this trial.  I hope not only that I shall be acquitted, but especially that freedom of speech will continue to exist in the Netherlands and in Europe.

From Atlas Shrugs

Related:  Top ten reasons why Sharia is bad for all societies

For all those who believe, "it can't happen here."
The Organization of the Islamic Conference Propaganda Machine
Camie Davis says Pavlov had dogs.  The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has the United Nations and Barack Obama.

The OIC, the largest voting bloc at the UN, has an agenda.  Their agenda is a one-two punch.  First, don't say anything negative about Islam.  Second, blame all of the world's problems on Israel, specifically the Jewish communities called "settlements."  The UN's and Obama's conditional responses to all things Islam and Israel are helping throw the OIC's one-two punch at the world hard and fast.

For over a decade, the OIC has systematically worked to criminalize the "defamation of Islam" and to protect Islam from "blasphemy."  In yearly resolutions at the UN on "combating defamation of religions" the OIC complains "Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism."  Though the resolutions are touted as protecting all religions, there is only one religion mentioned by name.  You guessed it. Islam.

Professor Ekmeledin Ihsanoglu, head of the OIC, said the issue of Islamophobia has been placed "at the top of our priorities and preoccupations, while conducting a large-scale worldwide effort to confront it."

After easily putting the UN on a leash, the OIC set its sights on its next Pavlovian subject.  "We have established an OIC Group in Washington D.C. with the aim of playing a more active role in engaging American policy makers," said Ihsanoglu.  Noting the OIC's accomplishments thus far in shaping public opinion, Ihsanoglu added, "In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film 'Fitna,' we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed."

Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch, warns of the OIC's plans.  "Among other things, they seek to define slander according to Islamic Sharia law -- making Islamic 'slander' a serious crime in every jurisdiction in the world, including the United States."

Steven Groves, with The Heritage Foundation, summed up the actions of the OIC by saying, "In short, it is clear that one goal of the OIC is for national legislatures, including presumably the U.S. Congress, to enact legislation prohibiting the criticism of any religion, especially Islam, its prophet, and its practitioners."

Continue reading here . . .
Comments . . .

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009 - 2011

All right reserved