Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete
system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, military, economic, and
social components. The religious component is a beard for all the other
components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a
country to agitate for their so-called “religious rights.”
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree
to “the reasonable” Muslim demands for their “religious rights,”
they also get the other components under the table.
As long as the Muslim population remains around
1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving
minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be
featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful
uniqueness:
United States -- Muslim 0.6% (Dearborn, MI --
Muslim 40%) Australia --
Muslim 1.7% Canada -- Muslim 1.9% China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5% Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3%
they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and
disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among
street gangs and they begin to agitate for Sharia-compliance under
the guise of "religious rights":
Denmark -- Muslim 2% Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7% Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an
inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the
population.
They will increase their demands for
Sharia-compliance -- as an example they will push for
the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food,
thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will
increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their
shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply.
They will demonstrate for perceived insults to
Islam, the Quran or Muhammad. (United
Kingdom, United States).
France -- Muslim 5% - 10% Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5% Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3% The Netherlands
-- Muslim 5.5% Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this
point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to
rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of
Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over
the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population,
they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their
conditions (Paris -- car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that
offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam --
Mohammed cartoons).
France's run-down city suburbs
have become "separate Islamic societies" cut off from the state.
Arab communities are increasingly rejecting French values and
identity to immerse themselves in Muslim culture and lifestyle.
As a result, France -- whose five million Muslims make up Europe’s
largest Islamic population -- was turning into a "divided nation,"
the study called Suburbs of the Republic found.
Guyana -- Muslim 10% India -- Muslim
13.4% Israel -- Muslim 16% Kenya -- Muslim 10% Russia --
Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting,
jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue
burning:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find
widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia
warfare:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40% Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon
-- Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers
and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use
of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 99.3%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 95%
Palestinian Territories -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the
Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a
Muslim:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
Yemen -- Muslim
100%
Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood
lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of
reasons.
"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world. And all of us against the infidel.
Leon Uris, "The Haj"
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as
France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based
on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the
community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power
than their national average would indicate.
The framework has been adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s
book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The
Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
It's Like The Blob -- But It's
Not Science Fiction
The most important video you'll ever watch (07:25) YouTube link
An Example Of Islamization
WWJ.com (Detroit)
reports that once
again the thugs at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
demand that non-Muslims change their practices to conform to Islamic
sensibilities, rather than calling upon Muslims in the United States to
adapt to American culture. Do they really expect anyone to believe
that McDonald's didn't hire this woman because it is "Islamophobic"?
Their opposition to the hijab is, I am certain, entirely hygienic, and
in a restaurant, that is something I am glad to see.
The Michigan
Chapter of (CAIR) is accusing McDonald's of religious and ethnic
discrimination, and has filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
complaint against a McDonald's Restaurant in Rochester Hills. The
complaint was filed on behalf of a Muslim woman who applied for a job at
the restaurant.
During the interview, she says that one of the
restaurant managers informed her that wearing an Islamic head scarf, or
hijab, would be a problem.
In 2008, the EEOC issued new
guidelines on accommodating religious beliefs and practices in the
workplace. The guidelines offer protection for workers who wear
religious attire such as a headscarf.
"We urge McDonald's to
take immediate action to bring its hiring policies into compliance with
long-established legal guidelines on reasonable religious accommodation
in the workplace," said CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid.
Walid noted that in 2008, CAIR-MI raised concerns with McDonald's
regarding two similar incidents in which Muslim women alleged being
denied employment because of hijab.
Words We Dare Not
Speak
NewsMax
is reporting that Rush Limbaugh used his radio program Wednesday to
lash out against Obama’s plan to censor the word "Islamic radicalism"
from a National Security document that deals with threats confronting
America.
Obama advisers say the new version emphasizes that the
U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism.
But the change is a radical shift in the National Security Strategy, a
document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war.
It currently states, "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism
is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st
century."
Limbaugh, America’s number one rated conservative
host, thinks the Obama initiative is dangerous.
On his show
Limbaugh said:
"Obama and his idealists, young whippersnappers,
think the United States is the problem. We are attacked
because we deserve to be. We have been imperialists, we've
overstepped our bounds in the world, it's totally understandable why
they would attack us and commit acts of terror against us. So
what do we need to do? We need to go in there and build them
schools, and we need to get them health care, and we need to talk to
them about science. Meanwhile, we do not have the money for
this."
"I ask a question? Maybe somebody can help me
with this. What are we doing having relationships with the
Muslim world anyway? Do we have a relationship with the
Catholic world? Do we have a relationship with the Buddhist
world? Do we have a relationship with the Jewish world?
Well, if we did, Obama's taken care of that. But we don't have
relations with religious worlds."
"If we can't call Islamic
radicals 'Islamic radicals,' we shouldn't call rapists "rapists."
We should call them 'uninvited perpetrators,' or 'penetrators,' if
you wish. Murderer? Do you think people like being
called a murderer, even if they are? Do you think that's going
to forge a decent relationship with murderers?"
"So the
premise is we deserve it. We should have been hit. It's
time we face the facts, and to prevent them from hitting us again,
we have to acknowledge that. Stop calling them Islamic
radicals, stop calling them terrorists, instead build them
hospitals. I can't imagine what it must be like to be in a
family who lost someone in 9/11 to hear about this guy's plans for
the Muslim world. I can't imagine what it was like when they
found out that this government was willing to spend $200 million a
year in security for the people who blew up the World Trade Center
in a civil trial. I can't imagine the anger they must have
felt."
More Islamization From The White House
NDTV.com
says that a top official of the Obama
Administration, tasked to improve ties with the Muslim world, said
that Indian Muslims are not terrorists, even as many of them are
increasingly tired of being defined as such.
"I talk about the
bloggers that I meet in India who are tired of Muslims being defined as
terrorists," Indian-origin
Farah Pandith, the US Special Representative
to the Muslim Community, said in a web video chat on Saturday.
"They're getting out there and talking about what's happening in India,
with 160 million Muslims in India -- all of whom, by the way, are not
terrorists, excuse me," asserted the Indian-American Pandith, who has
travelled to more than two dozen Muslim countries and those having
sizeable Muslim population, said that the Obama Administration is
reaching out to this community across the world to change the widely
held negative view about Islam and terrorism.
"The narrative has
to change by the conversations that we are having, and not to put
everything in one big bucket, just because, obviously, somebody maybe of
one faith that does something bad does not mean that everybody of that
faith is in that same bucket," she said in response to a question,
adding that Muslims are trying very hard to push away any kind of
narrative that would give that impression.
"We as Muslims do not
support the use of violence in any way, shape or form," she said.
"You have seen cross-cultural responses to Muslims and non-Muslims
working together to push back against any kind of violence," Pandith
said. "We need to do more to engage and build dialogue. And
what this president has said is that it is a priority for us to engage
Muslims around the world," she said.
"Overseas we're trying to
build bridges that have been broken and also want to restore
opportunities for dialogue. We want to see where we can be more
useful in partnering and building initiatives. And that requires
us to put especial effort, right at this moment in time, to develop new
relationships. So that's why we're doing this," Pandith said.
The Obama Administration official said the Muslim world is not
monolith community, but very diverse.
"It's talking about
diversity, and it's talking about things that this country stands for.
When we talk about the West, Muslims are part of the West. There
are 30 million Muslims in Western Europe. There are millions of
Muslims in America," she said, adding that this is not a zero-sum game.
"It's not us versus them. It sort of debunks the entire Samuel
Huntington theory of 'The Clash of Civilizations'."
It's not the
West versus the East. It's not America versus Islam. Obama
has talked very clearly about the fact that Islam is part of America,"
she said.
More Islamization
from the White House -- "Obama has talked very clearly about the fact
that Islam is part of America."
Islam and the American way of
life can never co-exist. It's impossible. The two are water and
oil.
We need
to remember that Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. It is a
complete system. Islam has religious, social, dietary, legal, economic,
political and military components. The religious component is a
beard for all the other components.
When
Muslims agitate for their "religious rights," they are really agitating
for you to accept their social, legal, economic, and political
practices, customs and laws under the guise of religious rights.
And
Pandith talks about diversity -- race? maybe! -- but there is no
diversity of thought in Islam. There is no diversity of lifestyle.
There is no "pursuit of happiness" in Islam. Islam dictates every aspect of the Mohammedan's life.
There
certainly is
no diversity of religion. YOU
can't even enter the cities of Mecca
and Medina. There are no churches or
synagogues in Saudi Arabia.
You can go to jail for
possessing a Bible. Saying there's
diversity in Islam is a lie.
Even in
America, living like a normal American
can get you killed in Islam. There is no freedom in Islam. Islam
is foreign to our way of life -- and you have to listen to that wailing
five times a day -- every day.
Three Things About Islam
Three surprising things you should know about Islam (08:10)
YouTube link
Islamization Of Paris -- A Warning To The
West
Undercover video shows scenes from Paris that French leadership
refuses to acknowledge (06:53)
An ordinary French citizen who has been watching the Islamization of
Paris decided that the world needed to see what was happening to his
city. He used a hidden camera to start posting videos on
YouTube. His life has been threatened and so he uses the alias
of "Maxime Lepante."
AP Won’t Report Korans Being Burned
Memo sent to AP staff:
From: Kent, Tom Sent: Thursday,
September 09, 2010 11:53 AM Subject: Standards Center guidance:
Planned Sept. 11 Quran burning
Colleagues,
As you
know, a group known as the Dove World Outreach Center in
Gainesville, Fla., has announced that it intends to burn copies of
the Quran on Sept. 11.
In the runup to this event, we've seen
a rush of stories, photos and video from points around the world.
Let's keep our coverage in proportion. Although many are
speculating on the effect the Quran burning could conceivably have,
at the moment it's a proposal by a tiny group that may or may not
happen.
We plan ONE main spot story on this issue a day.
The News Center will coordinate where this story will originate
from. Routine spot news -- for instance, comments about the
plan by political or other public figures -- should be funneled to
the point handling the main story. We should avoid a profusion
of separates beyond what any newspaper, website or broadcaster would
actually use. This includes stories, photos, audio and video
that repeatedly make the same point, for or against the burning.
Consult the News Center if you have questions on this.
The
concept of this planned event is offensive to many Muslims
worldwide.
From
the U. S. State Department --
Saudi Arabia -- "Standards of Conduct and Religious Police: Islam is
the official religion of the country and pervades all aspects of life in
Saudi Arabia. Public display of non-Islamic religious articles
such as crosses and Bibles is not permitted. Travel to Makkah
(Mecca) and Medina, the cities where the two holiest mosques of Islam
are located, is forbidden to non-Muslims."
Almost all Muslim
countries forbid the building of churches. Many Muslim countries
are burning them down as fast
as they can find them. We have permitted them to build thousands
of new mosques here in the US -- some of them incubators of terror --
but that hasn't and won't change a damned thing over there.
Almost all Muslim countries forbid Muslims from converting to another
religion under threat of death -- thousands of non-Muslims are allowed
to convert to Islam here in the US -- but that hasn't and won't change a
damned thing over there.
Christians and Jews are asked, "How
would you like it if Muslims burned the Bible?" Well, here's the
problem: we haven't burned any Qurans for hundreds of years. But
in that same period Muslims have burned millions of bibles. They
still do it every day. Our own military recently
burned bibles, so as to not "offend" Muslims.
The truth is,
it
happens every day somewhere in the world. Do you know why we
don't hear of it here? Two reasons:
1. The Liberal Media does not like reporting
anything critical of Islam (recall the cowardice of our newspapers
in not publishing the Danish Cartoons)
2. If our
newspapers had to print barbaric acts committed by Muslims on a
daily basis there would be no room to print the local news.
In Saudi Arabia, Bibles
are shredded. People caught inside Saudi Arabia who have more
than one Bible are arrested. The penalty, lashing. Saudi
Arabia, ruled by Shariah law, laws based on the interpretation of the
Koran. The outrage from the Obama administration on the issue of
the Saudi government confiscating Bibles owned by Christians, people
arrested then sentenced to a public lashing: Zero, zilch, nada.
I have a single question for Barack
Obama -- How can I respect a "religion" that holds as one of its basic
tenets that I must submit to it or die?
Walid Shoebat On The Islamization Of The
United States
Walid Shoebat, a convert from Islam to Christianity, speaks on
the reality of the attempt to Islamize the United States of
America. You will learn a lot from this 3-part speech.
In particular, note his words that "Terrorism is not the
explosion. Terrorism is a political act." Watch
it, and then pass it on.
How Islamic Supremacism Is Overwhelming
Democracy
Robert Spencer
says that after 9/11, you may recall, the United States was going to
bring democracy to the Islamic world. Nine years later, we have
Sharia Constitutions in both Iraq and Afghanistan. A Shi'ite
client of the Iranian mullahs rules shakily in Iraq, while in
Afghanistan the U.S.-backed president is increasingly hostile to America
and even threatens to join the Taliban that he was supposed to be
fighting against.
But that isn't even the worst of it.
Paradoxically, instead of bringing democracy to the Islamic world, the
years since 9/11 have seen only success after success in Islamic
supremacist efforts to undermine democracy in the West. Bending
over backwards not to appear "anti-Muslim" in their anti-terror efforts,
the U.S. and Western Europe have allowed in large numbers of Muslim
immigrants who hold to a radically undemocratic political ideology, one
that is rooted in Islamic texts and teachings and thus is not
susceptible to negotiation, compromise, or the gentle pressure of
"assimilation."
It has all happened quite quickly, and yet
gradually enough to have generally escaped the notice of those who have
been living through it. Nonetheless, life in Western societies has
already been utterly transformed, and more changes -- for the worse --
are certain to come. In the elegiac, insightful and sweeping new
book
Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in the West, the
American expatriate Abigail R. Esman, who now lives in the Netherlands,
surveys the damage.
It's a profoundly moving, personal account
of how the stealth jihad has advanced in the Netherlands over the last
decade and more, written by someone who was in the center of it all. Esman knew Theo van Gogh, murdered by Islamic jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri
in 2004 for his film Submission about the plight of Muslim women, and
was close friends with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the outspoken Somali ex-Muslim
who served for a time in the Dutch Parliament and who collaborated with
van Gogh on Submission, before death threats led her to flee the
country. She watched as Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn rose to
international prominence for his opposition to unrestricted Muslim
immigration and the Islamization of the Netherlands -- and then was
murdered by a Dutchman who said he did it out of sympathy for the
nation's Muslims. Esman recalls: "There were those -- and I was one of
them -- who thought Fortuyn was little more than a pretender, a
narcissist with a big mouth and glib tongue who would quickly be exposed
and then forgotten. We were the most wrong of all."
Esman details
the horror of the murder of van Gogh, the bloody triumphalist Islamic
boasts of his murderer, the supine reaction of Dutch authorities, and
the indifference of self-proclaimed moderate Muslims. Noting their
absence at a November 2005 memorial for van Gogh attended the Dutch
prime minister and the mayor of Amsterdam, she writes: "Muslim moderates
are part of 'us,' not 'them.'" Yet when they should have been there,
just to make that simple statement, to present that one gesture of
solidarity, they were not. And that they weren't makes me consider, on
second thought, that maybe they aren't quite with us, after all."
But America has managed to assimilate its Muslim population much
more successfully, hasn't it? After surveying a number of jihad terror
plots perpetrated by both Muslim immigrants and homegrown converts to
Islam, Esman concludes that that bit of conventional wisdom, like so
much else in the popular understanding of the jihad terror threat, is
simply wrong. Our freedoms are being eroded here no less unmistakably
than they are being eroded in Europe. The consequences of the folly of
our government and law enforcement officials may be less obvious to the
general public than it is in Europe, but in the age of Obama that is
rapidly changing.
So what is to be done? Must we choose between
becoming an Islamic state or a totalitarian state imposed in the name of
"security?" Esman contends that it is not too late to save our free
societies, if we firmly reject the suicidal philosophy of
multiculturalism and take other steps she outlines in Radical State. Radical State is a unique and powerful
book because it brings to vivid life the human cost of the ongoing Islamization of Europe. Already the massive importation of Islamic
supremacists with nothing but contempt for European civilization and an
intention to replace it with Sharia at the earliest opportunity has been
a catastrophe of incalculable proportions for European societies.
Abigail Esman has lived through the worst of it, or the worst so
far, and shows all the large and small ways in which our lives, our
joys, our freedoms, are diminished. If she is heeded now, it may not be
too late to salvage at least some of what has made us so free and so
alive for so long.
But that is a big "if."
Brooklyn, NY -- 6 AM
And, as Christmas trees are taken down, creches
removed, and Santa Claus banned, we have this shiite!
Pamela Geller
asks, "Aren't there nuisance laws, public ordinances, and disturbing
the peace laws? I mean, really. This is harassment and attrition."
This is only the beginning.
The True Face Of Islam
This video is 6 minutes long, but it is a must watch. If
you don't have the time now, come back later.
These people
will tell you what they want -- world-wide Shari'a -- all you have
to do is listen to them.
Geert Wilders Speech At His "Heresy" Trial
The lights are going out all over Europe.
All over the continent where our culture flourished and where man
created freedom, prosperity and civilization. Everywhere the
foundation of the West is under attack.
All over Europe the
elites are acting as the protectors of an ideology that has been bent on
destroying us since fourteen centuries. An ideology that has
sprung from the desert and that can produce only deserts because it does
not give people freedom. The Islamic Mozart, the Islamic Gerard
Reve [a Dutch author], the Islamic Bill Gates; they do not exist because
without freedom there is no creativity. The ideology of Islam is
especially noted for killing and oppression and can only produce
societies that are backward and impoverished. Surprisingly, the
elites do not want to hear any criticism of this ideology.
My
trial is not an isolated incident. Only fools believe it is.
All over Europe multicultural elites are waging total war against their
populations. Their goal is to continue the strategy of
mass-immigration, which will ultimately result in an Islamic Europe -- a
Europe without freedom: Eurabia.
The lights are going out
all over Europe. Anyone who thinks or speaks individually is at
risk. Freedom loving citizens who criticize Islam, or even merely
suggest that there is a relationship between Islam and crime or honor
killing, must suffer and are threatened or criminalized. Those who
speak the truth are in danger.
The lights are going out all over
Europe. Everywhere the Orwellian thought police are at work, on
the lookout for thought crimes everywhere, casting the populace back
within the confines where it is allowed to think.
This trial is
not about me. It is about something much greater. Freedom of
speech is not the property of those who happen to belong to the elites
of a country. It is an inalienable right, the birthright of our
people. For centuries battles have been fought for it, and now it
is being sacrificed to please a totalitarian ideology.
Future
generations will look back at this trial and wonder who was right.
Who defended freedom and who wanted to get rid of it.
The lights
are going out all over Europe. Our freedom is being restricted
everywhere, so I repeat what I said here last year:
It is not
only the privilege, but also the duty of free people -- and hence also
my duty as a member of the Dutch Parliament -- to speak out against any
ideology that threatens freedom. Hence it is a right and a duty to
speak the truth about the evil ideology that is called islam. I
hope that freedom of speech will emerge triumphant from this trial.
I hope not only that I shall be acquitted, but especially that freedom
of speech will continue to exist in the Netherlands and in Europe.
Related:Top ten reasons why Sharia is
bad for all societies
For all those who believe, "it
can't happen here."
The Organization of the Islamic Conference
Propaganda Machine
Camie Davis says Pavlov had dogs. The
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has the United Nations and
Barack Obama.
The OIC, the largest voting bloc at the UN, has an
agenda. Their agenda is a one-two punch. First, don't say
anything negative about Islam. Second, blame all of the world's
problems on Israel, specifically the Jewish communities called
"settlements." The UN's and Obama's conditional responses to all
things Islam and Israel are helping throw the OIC's one-two punch at the
world hard and fast.
For over a decade, the OIC has
systematically worked to criminalize the "defamation of Islam" and to
protect Islam from "blasphemy." In yearly resolutions at the UN on
"combating defamation of religions" the OIC complains "Islam is
frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and
terrorism." Though the resolutions are touted as protecting all
religions, there is only one religion mentioned by name. You
guessed it. Islam.
Professor Ekmeledin Ihsanoglu, head of the
OIC, said the issue of Islamophobia has been placed "at the top of our
priorities and preoccupations, while conducting a large-scale worldwide
effort to confront it."
After easily putting the UN on a leash,
the OIC set its sights on its next Pavlovian subject. "We have
established an OIC Group in Washington D.C. with the aim of playing a
more active role in engaging American policy makers," said Ihsanoglu.
Noting the OIC's accomplishments thus far in shaping public opinion,
Ihsanoglu added, "In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film
'Fitna,' we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines
that should not be crossed."
Robert Spencer, director of Jihad
Watch, warns of the OIC's plans. "Among other things, they seek to
define slander according to Islamic Sharia law -- making Islamic
'slander' a serious crime in every jurisdiction in the world, including
the United States."
Steven Groves, with The Heritage Foundation,
summed up the actions of the OIC by saying, "In short, it is clear that
one goal of the OIC is for national legislatures, including presumably
the U.S. Congress, to enact legislation prohibiting the criticism of any
religion, especially Islam, its prophet, and its practitioners."
, the
American expatriate Abigail R. Esman, who now lives in the Netherlands,
surveys the damage. 