The top items on this page are archived
in logical order, and then in order of discovery. Blue titles are
hot links . . .
The Documents
One really has to wonder why Obama just won't
produce his "Certificate of Live Birth." No, not the fraudulent "Certification
of Live Birth" (COLB) shown below. The one the Obama Campaign released to the Daily Kos
and now lives -- in evolved form -- at FactCheck.org. The one that this page will demonstrate is a counterfeit
document:
click for larger image
This is an example of a real,
honest-to-God "Certificate of Live Birth" issued by the State of Hawaii.
The image below of a 1961 Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth belongs to
one of the Nordyke twins. The twin
sisters were born the
day after Obama. Click the image to see
a large copy of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates:
click for larger image
Now go back and look at Obama's
document. Do you see the difference? Do you see the bogus
piece of crap that Obama is trying to pass off to the American People?
Read on and be amazed at the scope of this fraud.
In "Dreams..." Obama Tells Us There Is A Birth Certificate
We know from "Dreams...," that Obama has a birth certificate. He tells us so
(Pg.
26 last paragraph):
"I discovered this article, folded away among
my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I
was in high school. It's a short piece, with a photograph of him.
No mention is made of my mother or me, and I'm left to wonder whether
the omission was intentional on my father's part, in anticipation of his
long departure. Perhaps the reporter failed to ask personal
questions, intimidated by my father's imperious manner; or perhaps it
was an editorial decision, not part of the simple story that they were
looking for. I wonder, too, whether the omission caused a fight
between my parents."
Obama is reticent to release his long-form birth
certificate for one of two reasons:
1. There is something on the document,
or missing from the document,
that Obama doesn't want the American People to see.
2.
There is no document, and the above passage is just another Obama
fantasy.
Politifact Asks For Obama's Birth
Certificate
In March 2008 people were asking, "who is Barack Obama," and one of
the questions they were asking was, "is Obama a Muslim?" Another
question was, "is his middle name Muhammed?"
The Obama Exploratory Committee
even released a
statement, "To be clear, Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was
not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United
Church of Christ in Chicago."
This statement was amended by the campaign on March 14th, to say, "Obama
was never a practicing Muslim."
Is it clear yet? Maybe not, because the official Obama 08
website
still contains this statement: "Obama Has Never Been A Muslim."
Anyway, in the process of researching an email rumor about
Obama's name, Politifact, the political blog at the St. Petersburg Times
in Florida,
reported that the Obama campaign refused to provide the newspaper
with a copy of Obama's birth certificate.
On June 12, 2008, the
Obama campaign sent an e-mail to PolitiFact with
a copy of the senator's "birth certificate" as an attachment.
Daily Kos & AsperGirl
The same day, June 12, 2008, the Daily Kos
posted the now-infamous Certification of Live
Birth (COLB) image along with a cover story. Kos
received 648 comments in a span of only 24 hours (the first 644
were about the most insipid, lame, and mindless reactions ever
accumulated in one place).
The vast majority of
the
comments consisted of derogatory comments about John
McCain and his eligibility issue:
HOWEVER, there was one, brave Kos commenter who identified all of the
key anomalies in the COLB image and had the stones to question it’s
authenticity. Her screen name is "AsperGirl" and
her comment was
#643, or one of the last five comments to be posted.
Why is this significant?
Because I believe that her comments hit too close to home. I believe
that she struck a nerve, and that’s why the comments section was closed
off to new ones less than three hours after he post.
Here are her comments, and they serve as a testament to those loyal to
the truth:
Birth Certificate is an Obvious Fake (0+ / 0-)
Sorry to disabuse you folks, but this birth certificate on dailykos
is an obvious fake.
The fake "birth certificate" just appeared Thursday morning on
dailykos without any reference as to who released it or where it came
from.
There is a link from the FightTheSmears website to "the truth"
posting on MyBarackObama.com to it without any reference. (i.e. there is
no "this is Barack Obama’s birth certificate provided to dailykos by
person xxx of the Obama campaign")
There is no provenance explaining where the "birth certificate" came
from. In Hawaii, birth certificates aren’t publicly available and
reporters’ requests for one have been ignored for months.
There is no explanation as to whom vouches for its origins or its
authenticity.
The certificate number is blacked out. Why?
There are image artifacts consistent with forgeries and image
processing. It’s not a real, unprocessed scan of a birth
certificate.
It’s not certified. Hawaii state code provides that
certificates issued by the department of health be certified:
"§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of
sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall,
upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any
certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.
(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department,
certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the
same as the original,..."
This certificate is what the Hawaii DOH calls a "Late" Certificate of
Birth, and it is not an original Birth Certificate for a birth recorded
near the date of actual birth. In Hawaii, anyone can claim they
were born there and submit the evidence years after the birth to obtain
a late "Certificate of Birth".
"Who is Eligible to Apply for Late Registration? As provided by
law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5), the following persons may apply for late
registration: Any person born in Hawaii who is one year old or older and
whose birth has not been previously registered in Hawaii, or that
person’s parent, guardian, next of kin, or older person acting for that
person and having knowledge of the facts of birth may request the
registration of a late certificate of birth.
Doe the Obama campaign have a statement on this uncertified "birth
certificate?"
Isn’t this Obama’s "birth certificate" issue getting to be kind of
strange by now?
How can a man run for President without disclosing his birth
certificate?
Why does an anonymous, no-provenance, obviously fake scan of an
uncertified birth certificate appear on DailyKos, a fanatically
pro-Obama blog?
Why won’t the Obamas or the Obama campaign just formally and
transparently release a certified copy of Barack Obama’s birth
certificate?
"It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant." - Barack Obama
by AsperGirl on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 08:05:30 AM PDT
Israel Insider’s Report
On June 24th, 2008, Israeli Insider
blog reported the "birth certificate" claimed by the Barack Obama
campaign is not certified as authentic and appears to be a Photoshopped
fake.
The image, purporting to come from the Hawaii Department
of Health, has been the subject of intense skepticism in the blogosphere
in the past two weeks. But now the senior spokesman of that
Department has confirmed to Israel Insider what are the required
features of a certified birth document -- features that Obama's
purported "birth certificate" clearly lack.
The image became
increasingly suspect with Israel Insider's revelation that variations of
the certificate image were
posted on the Photobucket image aggregation website --
including one listing the location of Obama's birth as Antarctica, one
with the certificate supposedly issued by the government of North Korea,
and another including a purported photo of baby Barack --
one of which has a "photo taken"
time-stampjust two minutes before the article and
accompanying image was
posted on the left-wing Daily
Kos blog.
That strongly suggests that Daily Kos obtained the
image from Photobucket, not the State of Hawaii, the Obama family, or
the Obama Campaign. Photobucket is not generally known as a
credible supplier of official vital records for any of the fifty states,
and the liberties that other Photoshoppers took with the certificates
confirms this.
Hawaii Hides Birth Records And The Mystery
Begins
Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has
become a focus of intense speculation -- and even several lawsuits -- in
October 2008, Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle placed the candidate's
birth certificate
under
seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no
one in the press obtains access to the original document under any
circumstances.
The governor's office officially declined a
request, made in writing, by Jerome Corsi, in Hawaii, to obtain a copy of the
hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama.
"It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of
persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he
seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the
governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a request seeking the
information.
Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an
original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant"
according to the legal description from the governor's office, the
spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a
person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of
the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the
registrant.
The official reason for denial of access
to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to
Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous
source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft.
Still, a
source said, confidentially, the motivation for withholding
the original birth certificate was political, although the
source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the
original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to
Obama.
The source also refused to answer questions about
the original document on file with the Department of Health was a
hospital-generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may
have been filed subsequent to the birth.
The anonymous source
made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release
Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the
document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such
request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.
Gibbs
Takes Credit
At 1:44, Gibbs clearly says, "I've seen the real birth certificate,
I put it on the Internet." (01:56)
For The Issuance Of Certificates -- The Law
Laws of the Territory of Hawaii
ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth
was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born
outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in
Hawaii.
Under that law, someone simply would have presented
herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born
in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and
presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities
accepted it, that was the end of it.
What Hawaii Really Said
Countless politicians, reporters, bloggers and even a few judges have
claimed that the State of Hawaii have
ascertained that Obama's birth certificate is on file and it proves he
was born in Hawaii.
"Therefore, I as Director
of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital
Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these
type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the
Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth
certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."
There is
nothing in that
statement that states the birth certificate Hawaii holds was
issued by Hawaii. There is nothing that states Obama was born in the State of Hawaii.
That statement simply says that Hawaii has the original birth
certificate "on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."
It is very obvious, in
reading the statement of the Director of Health, that this statement was
very carefully worded, which leaves the inquiring mind asking, why?
When DOH Director Chiyome Fukino announced to the press, on October
31, 2008, that "Hawaii has Obama’s original birth certificate on
record," this should have been the time for Hawaii to also confirm the
existence of the COLB posted online, since that is what prompted
hundreds of phone calls to Ukubo and company in the first place.
The fact that she didn't only reinforces the fact that Obama's genuine COLB does not
exist.
If the birth information on that COLB matched the birth
information in his birth record, then why not say so? It would
have stopped them from being bombarded with phone calls, and may have
ended the quest for his long-form birth certificate.
Conversely,
if the birth information on that COLB did not match the info on his
birth record, then they would be dancing around the issue and dodging
all questions about it -- which is exactly what they did -- and what
they are still doing.
Okubo Refuses To Authenticate COLB
PolitiFact.com actually has Okubo on the record
denying that the electronic COLB image provided by the Obama
campaign can be authenticated by her or by anyone at DHOH! But
that was only in a follow-up to their initial story where Okubo said the
COLB was a valid Hawaiian birth certificate.
PolitiFact.com describes the controversy that erupted from their initial
story:
"When the birth certificate arrived from the Obama campaign it
confirmed his name as the other documents already showed it.
Still, we took an extra step: We e-mailed it to the Hawaii Department of
Health, which maintains such records, to ask if it was real."
"It's a valid Hawaii state birth certificate," spokesman Janice
Okubo told us.
"Then the firestorm started."
After the "firestorm," Politifact apparently conducted a follow-up
interview with Okubo which shows that what Okubo meant was that the
Obama COLB only appeared to be be a valid Hawaiian BC, but she could not
and did not "verify" that it was a valid Hawaiian COLB BC.
Politifact: "Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate
last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
"And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? 'When we
looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he
could see pieces of the embossed image through it.'"
"Still, she acknowledges: 'I don't know that it's possible
for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.'"
Okubo had to back off her original claim. And a good thing ...
she originally said Obama’s alleged COLB was real because it looked like
her own. In other words, she used no formal technique to verify its accuracy.
She relied on no official record to verify its accuracy. She just
thought it looked like hers. At best, she follows up with a
second-hand anecdote, "... our registrar ... thought he could see pieces
of the embossed image ..."
Really? Nobody else could.
"Birth Certificate" Anomalies
The next few items will consist of anomalies in Barck Obama's "birth
certificate."
Lets start with some easy ones.
The
certificate number is blocked out and the document clearly says, "Any
alterations invalidate this certificate." Duh!
The name of
the alleged father is misspelled. Barak Hussein Obama spelled his
name Barak -- no "c."
And there ain't no such race as "African."
But those are the easy ones. There are some real mysteries.
Why is Obama's certificate number greater than
the Nordyke twins? It should be lower. He was born first of
the three.
DoHHS Inspector General -- Birth Certificate
Fraud
Over the last 25 years, a number of studies have addressed problems
related to false identification and the misuse of birth certificates.
These studies conclude that false identification is a major factor in
crime, and that most, if not all, Federal fugitives and drug trafficking
crimes are associated with false identification. They also
conclude that stolen, counterfeit, and altered birth certificates are
often used as "breeder documents" that allow the holder to obtain
documents needed to create new identities. The Office of Inspector
General has conducted three inspections focused specifically on birth
certificate fraud that identified a number of vulnerabilities in birth
certificate processes. Because so many Federal and State agencies
rely on birth certificates to assist them in determining eligibility for
services and benefits, it is important that these agencies have
current information
on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud to assist them in
the proper assignment and protection of benefits.
Computer Graphics Expert Says It's Bogus
Dr. Ron Polarik's final report is the culmination of over four months of
intensive, empirical research, the sole purpose of which has been to determine
if the images and photographs posted on the Internet are true
reproductions of a genuine document purported to be Obama's original
birth certificate.
In his report, Dr. Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and
specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with
computers, printers and typewriters, provides conclusive and irrefutable evidence
that the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) image created and distributed by
Obama's campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg's Factcheck, and the St.
Petersburg Times, and Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false
identification document.
Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the
photos taken by Annenberg's Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama
campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been
made from the same false identification document image, as well as from
additional false identification documents created for the same purpose;
namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true
reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, "Certification
of Live Birth" document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American
public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a
natural-born
citizen of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become
their President.
Sadly, mainstream media have totally ignored this inconvenient truth and
are not even been willing to even look at this birth certificate issue.
They are all still in-the-tank for Obama, but even more so now that he
is in line to be President. They all bought into the lies and
fraudulent documents proffered up as evidence on Obama's qualifications.
They have been too quick to label as "trash" or "garbage" any legitimate
questions asked about Obama's real birth certificate. Even
high-ranking governmental officials in the state of Hawaii where Obama
was allegedly born, won't reveal what's on Obama's original birth
certificate. All they have said is that they have it. They
have not said (1) where Obama was born, (2) when Obama was born, or (3)
even to whom Obama was born.
The answer to "What's on Barack Obama's real, original birth
certificate" ranks right up there with some of the great mysteries of
our time -- and that is really hard to swallow. That a man,
with a dubious background, has been elected to the highest office of the
greatest superpower in the world without ever having to prove who he
says he is! That is not "nutty," that's just plain insane!
With all that said, and without further ado, I present to you my final
and complete report on Barack Obama's bogus birth certificate, The Born
Conspiracy.
A second expert forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines has
filed an
affidavit [.pdf] associated with one of the lawsuits stating the following:
1. I am Sandra Ramsey
Lines, With an address at... I am a former federal examiner and
law enforcement officer. I began training as a forensic document
examiner in 1991. I am a Certified Diplomat of Forensic Sciences,
a member of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, a
member of the Southwestern Association of Forensic Document Examiners,
and a member of the Questioned Document Subcommittee of the American
Society of Testing and Materials. My background and credentials
are set forth in Exhibit I attached hereto.
2. I have
reviewed the attached
affidavit
[.pdf] posted on the internet from "Ron Polarik," who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death
threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of
experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the
internet by the various groups, which include the "Daily Kos," the Obama
Campaign, "Factcheck.org" and others cannot be relied upon as genuine.
Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm.
Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter
images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the
internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic
document.
3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one
aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of
the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would
allow anyone to ask the question, "Does this number refer to the
Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?"
It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there
would be no justifiable reason for obliterating it.
4. In my
experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any
document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a
definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this
case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect
Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all.
Genealogist Says It's Bogus
A third investigator, a genealogist, saysThe FactCheck.org Certificates of Live Birth (COLB) have been an
issue since they were posted. In an attempt to backup the original
forgery posted on the Obama campaign website, "Fight the Smears,"
FactCheck.org overlooked glaring errors with both COLBs. I
reference that there are two separate and individual documents as one
clearly shows an embossed SEAL while the other does not. The one
that does contain an embossed SEAL, however is not an official SEAL from
the State of Hawaii Department of Health, and hence, the document itself
is already in question.
Here (in an image
rich file) in an attempt to identify additional ink markings from the
Statement and Signature Stamp applied to the back of an authentic
Certificate from the Vital Records Department, I will be using the
FactCheck.org images and developing a composite image based on several
layers, and seeing if any additional indications can be detected.
This genealogist concludes the COLBs are forgeries, plain and
simple.
Forgery #1 - The COLB posted on 'Fight the Smears' - No
Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines,
Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.
Forgery #2 - FactCheck -
Two different COLB's one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of
Hawaii Department of Health SEAL
Forgery #3 - FactCheck - COLB
without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO
indicating of a SEAL.
So, how can there be three versions of a
document that Hawaii NEVER issued?
A
Nail In The COLB Coffin
NoBarack08 is reporting that
Barack Hussein Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB), the one that
has been posted all over the Internet, first the
DailyKos, then
Fight
The Smears and the at
FactCheck.org, has now been proven to be a fake, fabricated, and
forged document. There is no doubt that the original is not an
authentic State of Hawaii, Department of Health issued document.
NoBarack08 has established what appears to be proof that the original
COLB that was posted had no number or lettering indicating that it was
never issued by the State of Hawaii Department of Health. It was based
on a blank template, and nothing more.
Good stuff! Too much to post here, but
check it out
here.
He also
provides directions to replicate the process, so you can see for
yourself.
This is
probably why Janice Okubo, the Communications Officer for the Hawaii
Department of Health is on record
saying, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a
doubt what the image on the site [FactCheck.org] represents."
Miss Tickly Says It's Bogus
MissTickly -- aka
TerriK -- says Obama’s COLB lacks legal veracity. So,
what now?
On July 27, 2009, Obama was not verified as
"constitutionally qualified to be U.S. President" by the standards of
Hawaii’s Department of Health and Vital Statistics Registrar. Any
assertions by Nancy Pelosi or anyone else must be re-examined under the
following LIGHT:
The key is the distinction of the terms, "FILED
by Local Registrar" as opposed to "ACCEPTED by State Registrar"
We have two statements about two sets of vital records belonging to the
Obama issued from Hawaii. An "original birth certificate" that is
"on record in accordance to state policies and procedures" in October,
2008, AND "original vital records" that are "maintained on file," on
July 27, 2009.
• We also have a COLB presented by Obama that indicates the
information shown has been "Filed by Registrar" -- Fig.1 (at link)
• However, we also have samples found online of HAWAII COLBs that
say they have been "Accepted by State Registrar" -- Fig 2 & Fig 3 (at
link)
Using Nevada’s guidelines on vital statistics TerriK
walks through the process
here . . .
MissTickly
documents the fact that Obama's "vital records" have not only been
"amended," but have never been "accepted" by the Registrar. It is
not a completed document.
Exposing The False Hawaii Department Of Health
Seal
A records request made under the Uniform
Information Practices Act (UIPA), Hawaii’s Open Records law, for a black
and white copy of the Hawaii Department of Health’s (HDOH) departmental
seal as described as "Exhibit A" in their agency administrative rules
has yielded disclosure of an electronic copy of the Department’s
embossed seal.
While there is a story unfolding concerning the
HDOH’s irregular action and response to my request for disclosure of
"Exhibit A" that I will relay in the near future, I am restricting this
particular post to the introduction of the image they did provide me and
to offer some background on why it was requested and why it appears in "Obama’s
Garden." What I will say for now though is that the HDOH
appears to be very reluctant to release the specific record authorized
by law to be disclosed to me considering they first denied my request,
then conceded after consulting with the Office of Information Practices
(OIP) that disclosure is authorized by state law, then failed twice to
provide me the specific record I requested. Still, this newly
disclosed image represents major progress coming from such a
demonstrable and historically closed agency.
The Seal of the
Hawaii Department of Health has been in effect since 1988 when it was
made a part of the HDOH Title 11-1 administrative rules: "§11-1-2 Seal
of the department of health.
a) The official seal of the department
of health shall be circular in shape, two and one-fourth inches in
diameter. At the curve on the top portion there shall be the
words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH" and at the curve on the bottom portion
there shall be the words "STATE OF HAWAII." At the curve on
each side portion shall be a star. In the center of the seal
shall be the Caduceus, a winged rod entwined with two serpents,
which has long been recognized as a universal symbol of medicine.
The Caduceus shall be encircled by an indentation, which shall
separate it from the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH" and "STATE OF
HAWAII." For illustrative purposes, a black and white drawing
of the official seal is attached at the end of this section as
Exhibit "A," titled "Seal of the Department of Health," and dated
November 1, 1988, and made a part of this section."
Now, look at the close-up of the seal on
Obama's COLB from the Factcheck.org photos:
• The outer ring in HDOH example is a
single line. The outer ring on Obama's COLB is a double line.
• The inner ring in HDOH example is a
single line, like the outer ring. The inner ring on Obama's
COLB is a broad, woven line.
• The typeface is a significant
identifying feature of the seal. Obama’s is wide and bold, the
HDOH seal lettering is condensed and a much lighter weight.
•
Present is a font type treatment anomaly seen in the word "OF" --
see how small it is on Obama's COLB, as compared to the HDOH
example?
• The two stars, described in those
administration rules, are missing. Any alleged HDOH seal
missing these two stars is NOT an official seal according to
administrative rule §11-1-2.
Due to these indisputable facts, the seal on
Obama’s COLB is not the HDOH seal and Dr. Fukino does not have authority
over the seal appearing on Obama’s COLB according to the description in
the Title 11 rules AND the version disclosed in my records request.
The seal seen on Obama’s COLB HAS NO LEGAL WEIGHT either online or as a
physical copy.
AXJ-Action For Justice International Forum has a
thread entitled, "Obama’s COLB was never accepted by the Hawaii
Registrar!," that has some very interesting stuff related to the bogus
Obama Certification of Live Birth (COLB) that was provided to the Daily
Kos and others by the Obama Campaign.
Obama’s COLB has only
been "filed" but never "accepted." AXJ contends that if it hasn’t
been accepted, it’s not certified or official according to the State of
Hawaii.
click image for large copy
Notice the lower left hand corner for the wording "Filed"
or "Accepted" in this side by side comparison of two officially
certified "Accepted" Hawaiian COLB’s with Obama’s unofficial "Filed."
One comment says Orly Taitz will be presenting it to Judge
Carter tomorrow morning along with a request for a Subpoena to the
Registrar of Hawaii, but there is no information on
her website to that effect.
This has been pointed out
previously, but is now
popping up on current Google searches.
I will try and track down the Hawaii regulations for the use of the
terms, "Filed" and "Accepted." I'll update this item when/if
found. If any readers have information on the distinction between
"Filed" and "Accepted" shoot me an email.
Notice the
middle COLB. It has "Japanese" as a value of the "Race" field.
Hawaii's bureaucrats evidently are confused about race and nationality.
May help to explain why Obama Sr.'s race is listed as "African."
There were federal
regulations
in place in 1961 that provided the requirements to the states for birth
certificates, including the acceptable values for "Race" -- enter "227" in the "Page" text box and hit "Enter" --
warning
big .pdf file.
Although, I'm not sure any of this matters, since
there are three examiners who have each
declared Obama's COLB is
counterfeit. A big "thank you" to Liz --
Here is
the Hawaii statutes on the "FILED" and "ACCEPTED" on the COLB: -- see
sections 11-1-4(d) and 11-1-28.
The statute specifically states
that the date of filing is the date that a document is "RECEIVED" at the
Department of Health office. Obama’s information was received or
"FILED" on Aug. 8, 1961, according to his COLB. It has never
been "ACCEPTED" by the Registrar. Obama’s COLB is still being
"MAINTAINED" -- awaiting acceptance by the Hawaii State Registrar.
Here
is a ton of information about this issue -- this stuff is dynamite! --
the whole process -- check it out.
For Those Who Do Not Know What "Certify"
Means
Redbaiter
says for those who claim that Obama’s Birth Certificate has been
revealed to the world, from Bill O"Reilly through to even such local
luminaries as David Farrar, here is something that will hopefully break
through the massively thick foundation of ignorance that supports such a
perception. There is an online document. Computer generated.
Few have seen the actual paper document. Some young dumb Obots
somewhere looked at it and said it was valid. In fact, there is
nothing to substantiate this document and even though it is titled a
"certification," this raises the question, what does it certify and who
certified it? Closer inspection gives rise to a further question
-- does it really "certify" anything at all?
Here are two
images. The left image is the document Obama campaign
released to
the Daily Kos, and is
posted on his Fight The Smears website (and two more versions
have been posted
on FactCheck.org's website). The image on the right is the
actual birth certificate of a real but unidentified Hawaiian citizen.
Look hard now. Can you see the difference? Why of course you
can. One has three signatures (bottom left) that CERTIFY the
birth, the other has NO SIGNATURES and therefore NOTHING IS CERTIFIED.
No human being has validated or CERTIFIED with his/her signature that
Obama was born in Hawaii. The document is worthless.
click image for large copy
Yesterday, Steve Malzberg of the WOR radio network
interviewed Washington Times reporter Jeff Kuhner on the latest
developments in the Obama BC saga. Here is a transcript of part of
what Jeff Kuhner said during that interview.
"People around the
White House, and especially in Democrat circles, in private, at a
cocktail party, at a restaurant, will tell you where there is smoke
there is fire. They don’t know what it is, even some of the
liberal members of the media that I have spoken to off the record, have
said to me Jeff, we don’t want to touch this story because we know there
is something there. We don’t know what, we don’t know if its going
to reveal his religion, that was given to him by his father or his
stepfather, we don’t know if its about records that are eventually going
to come out about his travels to Pakistan, or whether that when he was a
student at university he applied for foreign aid as a foreign student,
we don’t know exactly what it is but the reluctance of this White House,
and its not just on the birth certificate, its on his health records,
its on his school records and university records, they are hiding
something, there is no question about it and the only question is what,
and how bad the damage will be. If, and I underline the word if,
it turns out that he was not born in the United States, we have a legal
political and constitutional crisis without precedence in this nation.
[..] This is what Democrat aides have been confiding in me,
political strategists and members of the liberal media, I’m talking
senior top editors (are saying), "why is the White House so determined
to keep the lid on this story and to prevent the documents from coming
out?"
[..] This controversy is not going away it is gaining
traction it is gaining momentum, it is gaining momentum in the courts,
and so you have Chris Matthews who is finally saying, "Look I have been
taking heat on this issue now for the last couple of years, just show me
the bloody birth certificate and lets get it over with, and thye can’t,
and Steve, this is a very key point, what many members in the liberal
media have been confiding to me is this, I ask them, I say look, this is
a bombshell of a story, it’ll be like Watergate, it’ll make your name,
all you have to do is break this story, I mean you’re going to look at
Pulitzer prizes for the rest of your life, you’ll be wealthy beyond
imagination, you’ll have all the fame and glory a journalist could ever
want."
They said, "Jeff, you don’t understand, if this story
turns out to be true, we fear it could lead to a civil war within
America." This is what they are telling me, that you’re going to
have African Americans so embittered, remaining loyal to Obama, so many
liberals, so embittered, loyal to Obama, but so many people in the rest
of the country now feeling that there is a serious constitutional
breach, that everything that he has passed, because he is
unconstitutional, and doesn’t have the right legal authority, everything
that he has passed is thereby illegal and unconstitutional. It
will literally be the worst constitutional crisis that ever gripped this
country, so they don’t want to touch this. So you have the media
abdicating their responsibility to pursue the truth and hold their
politicians accountable.
The Bottom Line
First Hawaii first "Files" a COLB, and then later the Registrar
"Accepts" by registrar State of Hawaii then certifies. It is not
certified until "accepted."
So you could file for a COLB with
Marilyn Monroe as your mom, born on Maui last year, and say "I have a
COLB 'on file' with Hawaii," as Obama has done. Also please note
Fukino only said she saw Obama's "vital records" that are "filed," that
say he was born in Hawaii. She does not say he was born in Hawaii.
Further, I have written to Okubo to get her to abide Hawaii's law
which requires her to "Verify 'any record'" and she not only refuses to
verify Obama's COLB but she also refuses to vouch for Fukino's
statement, as does the Attorney General (refuses to corroborate). The
Hawaii Office of Information Policy refuses to uphold the law as well.
I've sent this data to The Post & Email and they may write it up
shortly. Obama was not born in Hawaii and they have nothing to say
that he was. Zero!
Sure the COLB is a forgery, but it's only on
file anyway, until it's accepted by the registrar it's nothing. They all
know he was not born there. I spoke to Lingle's office and they said
he's from there, they did not use the language that he was born there.
From an attorney who wishes to
remain anonymous.
The Fact Of Birth
Harold says, while looking at copies of Obama's
Certification of Live Birth (COLB)
on the DailyKos and Obama's FightTheSmears websites, I noticed
something I have not seen commented on before. At the bottom of
the form it says:
This copy serves as prima facie evidence of
the fact of birth in any court proceeding.
"The fact of birth." It's funny how I missed
this important point. The COLB is intended ONLY to attest that the
person was born -- nothing else. In a sense, it affirms what we
can logically assume simply by looking AT Obama. If he's standing
there he must have been born. The COLB is not useful, as evidence,
outside of the birth itself, and not the circumstances, such as father,
mother, attending physician or nurse, or even the date.
Words are
everything when it comes to legislation. Courts wrestle with them
when a case hinges on the interpretation of legislative intent.
What did the legislature mean when it used a certain word rather than
another? Cases can be decided one way or another depending on
whether a judge believes that Congress intended something that is
otherwise unclear in the legislation itself.
I am struck by the
fact that the disclaimer uses "fact of birth" rather than "facts of
birth." The latter would encompass far more than the latter and
could be interpreted to mean the name of the father and mother, doctor,
date, etc. Again, words are everything, so I assume that when the
Hawaiian legislature passed those statutes they meant "fact" rather than
"facts" for a reason.
Personally, I believe that the COLB was
intended only to provide an individual with a basic document
establishing bona fides. That is, it shows that the person whose
name is on the document really was born and is not a fictitious
individual. I wonder if I had printed out that COLB on
appropriately marked paper and took it into a bank if they would accept
it as proof that I was Barack Obama. I doubt it.
Hawaii Is Loose
The Hawaiian "birth certificate" program.
The Dept. of
Hawaiian Homelands does NOT accept the "Certification of Live Birth" as
documentation. This is the same document that Obama is showing the
world as proof of his Hawaiian birth and American "natural born citizen"
status.
If you submit the "Certification of Live Birth" to the
DHHL, they will make phone calls and written inquiries (to have a paper
trail) to the office of Vital Statistics, to confirm information that
WOULD BE on the "Birth Certificate," that is NOT present on the
"Certification of Live Birth."
The DHHL, being a Hawaii state
agency, KNOWS the loopholes built into the Hawaiian "birth certificate"
system. Many of the laws Hawaii has hearken back to BEFORE the Hawaiian
Organic Act, BEFORE Hawaii was a territory, BEFORE King Kalakaua
ruled...
IN FACT, the court that Ann Dunham filed for her FIRST
divorce through in 1964 was done through a Hawaiian court, the "Circuit
Court of the First Judicial Circuit" that I've traced back to the 1860s.
That court is defunct today. The judge is in his 90s and retired
from the Hawaiian court system. There are many antiquated
procedures and laws still on the books that are mired in the annuls of
Hawaiian history.
As an island nation, Hawaii has had procedures
in place to allow for "stragglers" who were born on other islands, or in
other countries (Guam is similar, BTW). Such is the "loophole" Sun
Yat-sen exploited, Chinese revolutionary and political leader often
referred to as the "Father of Modern China." He was able to file a
"Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" application and immigrate to the US in
1904 using the form. Yat-sen was born in Guangdong province, China, in
1866. His "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" was issued based on
Sun's typewritten testimony rather than on any documentation from
witnesses. The "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" for WAS STILL
ISSUED UP UNTIL 1972; BHO was born in 1961.
SO, let's see, how
could a person like Ann Dunham (and later BHO when he was an adult)
exploit Hawaiian "birth certificate" law?
• file for a "Certificate
of Hawaiian Birth", using affidavits from herself and her mother saying
he was born in Hawaii ...
• convert the "Certificate of Hawaiian
Birth" to a "Certificate of Late Birth" as state law allows...
• convert the "Certificate of Late Birth" to a "Certificate of Live
Birth," with comments in Block 23, "Evidence for Delayed Filing or
Alteration"...
• and then BHO uses the "Certification of Live Birth,"
which was created and first used in Nov 2001, to hide any prior
alterations or modifications!
Did it happen THAT way? It's
anyone's guess. BUT because the Hawaiian "birth certificate"
program is SO freakin' loose, it's quite possible, with other variations
possible as well.
ADD TO THAT that Obama's "Certification of
Live Birth" states in the bottom lefthand corner: "Date FILED by
Registrar" vs. "Date ACCEPTED by State Registrar," there's plenty of
reason to be suspicious.
Hawaii's Multiple Birth Certificates
Generally, folks don't know that Hawaii law, even in 1961, provided for
several types of birth records, most of which are not what people
think of when they think of birth certificates. The following is a
description of those, including certificates for people not born in
Hawaii.
1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three
different birth certificates that were obtainable:
a. If the birth
was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical
professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the
facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other
information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health
Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in
1961).
b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by
a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an
adult could, upon testimony, file a "Delayed Certificate," that
required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement
of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed
filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The
statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate
must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official
before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18,
19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955
Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
c. If a child
born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of
live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the
first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued
upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the
Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii,
provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section
57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955
Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
2. In 1982, the
vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth
certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of
Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the
Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a
person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon
sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared
the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least
one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
3. The
language of the statute clearly applies to births in the days of the
Territory of Hawaii, so also births in 1961.
4. A press release
concerning numerous questions raised across the country as to whether or
not Obama was a natural born citizen was issued on October 31, 2008 by
the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
5. In that very carefully worded press release, Dr. Fukino said that she
had "personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures."
6. The intentional
ambiguity of that statement raises more questions that it answered.
7. That statement failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by
litigation across the country over the issue of Obama’s birth and
qualifications for the office of the President of the United States,
including:
a. The specific type of certificate was not identified. Could it be the certificate for someone born outside of the State of
Hawaii?
b. Being "on record" could mean either that its contents are
in the computer database of the department or an actual "vault"
original. If the latter, those are the words used to describe what is
there. The data base record could have been entered based on a birth
record for someone born outside of Hawaii.
c. Therefore, the value as
prima facie evidence is limited and easily overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be
obtained and verified with a Court Order.
8. It should also be noted
that in the face of all this litigation, the simple presentation of
Obama’s vault birth records would put the questions to rest.
9.
Obama has not taken this approach to a single one of the cases, but
instead has hired legal counsel across the country at no small expense,
much of it illegally from his campaign,
to defend the claims with motions to dismiss on standing and similar
procedural grounds.
10. Such response to the request for proof that
he is qualified to serve as President of the United States of America
only serves to raise more questions about this election.
COLBs For Anybody
Click the thumbnail to see a large copy of this beautifully printed
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
It belongs to Sun Yat-Sen,
the Father of Modern China, who was born in China.
This
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, dated March 14, 1904, was issued after
Dr. Sun signed a
raggedy type-written statement affirming that he was born in Hawaii on Nov. 24, 1870.
Sun
Yat-sen was born on November 12, 1866, to a peasant family in the
village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan county , Guangzhou prefecture, Guangdong
province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), not Hawaii, as this
document affirms.
We know Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's sister has a
Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth too, and she was born in Jakarta,
Indonesia. You can be born anywhere and get one.
Anna Dunham may not have been
America's #1 booster, but, gypsy that she was, she made sure her kids
were well-anchored in the good ole USA.
Proof Positive It's Bogus
The State Seal Is Bogus
click image to see large copy
It Is A Fake
People say that
Obama released a genuine copy of his actual Birth Certificate.
•
He never did, and they
are mistaken, misinformed, or misleading others if they do.
People say that
Obama released a genuine copy of his actual Certification of Live Birth.
•
He never did, and they
are mistaken, misinformed, or misleading others if they do.
People say that Hawaii confirmed
this copy to be Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth.
•
Hawaii never confirmed a
request for, nor the printing of, this Certification of Live Birth.
People say that Factcheck
verified this image as Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth, while
incorrectly referring to it as a "birth certificate."
•
Factcheck was complicit
in falsifying this image and passing it off as a genuine scan.
Obama also
knows that this image is fake and doesn't contain his actual birth
information.
• That's why Obama and his staff refuse to
answer any questions about his birth certificate, while ridiculing
anyone that dares ask.
Why The COLB?
The obvious question must be asked: If Obama has an original
"long form" birth certificate issued on the day of his birth by the
state of Hawaii, why would he also have a "Certification of Live Birth"?
It would not be necessary.
Barack Obama was asked if he was
eligible to become president under the Article II
"natural born"
eligibility clause. Obama masked the truth by posting a Hawaiian
Certification of Live Birth (COLB). His supporters
declared him a "native born" citizen and the issue was
pushed back into the realm of conspiracy theories.
Upon further
investigation, the mask of the COLB started to be more and more
revealing of the original 1961 certificate, made much of by Hawaii’s
Governor Lingle and the state’s Department of Health official, Dr.
Fukino, as more probably a Dept. of Health document and not a
hospital long form. [See my recent post on the Hollister dismissal
in which I quoted Endnote 12 of Mario Apuzzo's Kerchner et al vs. Obama
et al case. Apuzzo's jurisprudence of challenging prima facie evidence
is brilliant.
If Obama was trying to promote his Hawaiian native
born status, he would have willingly posted a hospital certificate as
solid, best evidence. A COLB is labeled as only prima facie
evidence; the validity of its information open to inspection by a proper
Hawaiian court venue.
If the C.O.L.B. referenced
document was not a hospital birth certificate, what was it? Under
Hawaiian statute, specifically §338-5,[7] it is compulsory for the Dept.
of Health to register a newborn child of a Hawaiian resident, even if no
documentation of place and time of birth is presented. Only the word of
one parent is required by law.
If the hidden 1961 certificate is
a §338-5 form, face down like a card in a poker game, the $800,000
Barack Obama ponied up to prevent its public release means Obama is not
just bluffing, but covering up perjury and other violations of election
law.
In the end, a §338-5 compulsory registration will be more
probative of the direct testimony evidence of Obama’s Kenyan birth,[8]
than of his claimed Hawaiian birth.
Obama Stonewalls
It's been more than two years since
Obama announced his candidacy for President, and five months since he
was elected President, yet Obama has repeatedly refused to provide any
proof that he is Constitutionally qualified to be president.
Despite what you may have heard, Obama's eligibility issue has never
been settled. If you are looking for reasons why, there is only
one reason that you should know:
Barack Hussein Obama flat-out refuses to show the one document that
would confirm or deny his true identity, parentage, and birth origin --
his original, "vault" birth certificate.
In March 2008, a lawsuit was filed to remove John McCain, the GOP
candidate, from the ballot because his natural-born status was also in
doubt. John McCain immediately responded by showing his actual,
original birth certificate to Congress.
On June 12, 2008, about three months after John McCain settled
his eligibility issue, the pressure on Obama to do the same led to the
release of what was called his "original birth certificate" -- an image
copy, not a paper copy, by his campaign, not by himself, to the Daily
Kos blog, not to Congress, or to anyone even remotely responsible for
vetting him.
Moreover, what Obama
submitted for "release," was not an image copy of his original birth
certificate as claimed. It was an abbreviated transcript of a
birth record called a "Certification of Live Birth." HOWEVER, the
image itself was a fabricated forgery intended to mimic this transcript.
Since a forged birth document cannot represent a true birth record, it
means that someone committed forgery just to keep Obama's actual birth
record from ever being known.
What Is The Evidence Of A Counterfeit
Many people who also saw this image
(see Appendix A) had said that it was a "fake," and that the document
pictured in the image could not possibly be genuine. The image
anomalies that they pointed out as proof of a forgery included those
that I had found and reported, working independently. Here is an
annotated list of them:
1. The image
contains digital signatures of Photoshop
2. Only one side of alleged COLB shown (COLB is two-sided)
3. Missing second-fold line while
first fold-line is shown
4. Missing
the embossed Seal of Hawaii
5.
Missing the State Registrar's signature
6. Unusual and unnatural pixilation between the letters of text
data
7. Original text was removed by
pasting a layer of background over them
8. Different text was typed onto a text layer and merged with
background layer
9. Pixel blocks of
text data are different from the data headers
10. Heavy and unnecessary sharpening of the whole image,
except for the border
11. Border was
created as a separate layer and merged with other layers
12. Border pattern is more blurred
than the background
13. Border
pattern more transparent than those on genuine scans
14. Top and bottom black border bars
have less pixilation than text
15.
Border bars are more black in color than any of the text
16. Absence of green, background
pixels inside the border bar text
17. White lines between border bars and pattern (both sides)
18. Image colors are very different
from scan images of real COLBs
19.
Lack of pixilation in black rectangle covering certificate number
20. Different blocking artifacts
from JPG compression found across the image
It's Invalid
In Dr. Ron Polarik's final report,
"Obama's Born Conspiracy," these anomalies are explained in greater
detail.
The consensus among all of us
was that this Certification of Live Birth document image (COLB) had been
heavily doctored. What we didn't know were the lengths to which
the Obama Campaign and his enablers in the media went to rebuff any
claims of forgery by personally attacking anyone for even suggesting it.
They called us "tin-foil hat wearing, right-wing conspiracy nuts," or "birthers"
for short, but these titles are tame in comparison to the vicious and
virulent slurs hurled our way. Rather than respond with some
confirmatory evidence to support the claim that the scan image was
genuine, they offered all kinds of logical excuses as to why it wouldn't
be fake, coupled with comments from individuals and fact-checking groups
claiming to be non-partisan but clearly shilling for Obama. The
common denominator here is that all of them failed to provide a single
shred of valid evidence that Obama's actual COLB document was even
printed in June 2007 by Hawaii's DOH, let alone scanned a year later.
One thing that no one could deny was
that a black, graphic rectangle was added to the image to redact the
COLB's certificate number, and then resaved, permanently altering the
COLB shown in the image, and in effect, changing the image itself.
The following caveat appears on the COLB document:
ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE
In other words, "Which part of this caveat did the "birther"
critics NOT understand?
What's Wrong With This Picture
There were enough alterations in this
one image to fill a book on "How to falsify an image and hide the signs
of forgery." Nothing about this image was genuine, yet, five weeks
later, Factcheck posted a set of nine digital photos of what they claim
was the same, alleged birth certificate used to make the scan image.
What's wrong with this picture? (or
should I say, "pictures?")
If what's
shown in the scan image is bogus, then what's shown in Factcheck's
photos must also be bogus. We already knew that Factcheck was a
shill for Obama along with being an accomplice to his document fraud.
So, we were not surprised when Factcheck launched an all-out assault on
the "birthers" and their "right-wing conspiracy theories" along with the
photos they posted on their website. Factcheck's COLB photos
allegedly show the front side of the embossed Seal that was not shown in
the scan image (except while under image enhancements). These COLB
photos also show the second fold-line that never was seen in the scan
image under any conditions.
Factcheck intended their photos to verify the existence of a real COLB
document that the claim was used to make the scan image.
Unfortunately for Factcheck, their photos actually verify that their
scan image was bogus. For if this document object, with its
pronounced second fold-line and heavily embossed Seal, was used to make
the original scan image, then the scanner would never have missed
copying these prominent features. Added to that revelation is the
suspicious failure of Factcheck to photograph the most important part of
the document, the entire embossed Seal as seen from both sides.
Factcheck's photos taken from the back side of the Seal show that the
top third of the Seal was deliberately cropped from the picture.
Even in the full shot of the Seal, the top one-third of it was also cut
off -- well below the second fold line.
Rather than lend credibility to the original scan image, these
photos supported Polarik's conclusions that the scan image was not made
from a genuine document, but was fabricated from other images. A
top, forensic document examiner also agrees with my conclusions.
The fact that Obama's original birth certificate is not the only
document being withheld from view, only underscores the immense effort
taken to keep Obama's real identity from ever being known.
If the Obama narrative is real, and
Obama really is who he says he is, then why are there no real documents
to verify it, such as his Punahou School records, Selective Service
Registration, Occidental College records, Passport (used to visit
Pakistan), Columbia College records, Columbia thesis, Harvard College
records, Baptism certificate, Medical records, Illinois State Senate
records, Law License application, Law practice client list, and
University of Chicago scholarly articles?
Does Anyone See A Pattern Here
From
the first day he ran for the Office of the President of the United
States, Barack Obama, a constitutional
lawyer, knew that he was not a natural-born citizen and not
constitutionally qualified to become president. But, he ran anyway. Obama may also have known that he was not born in Hawaii, that he came
to Hawaii as an illegal immigrant, and that he was never naturalized as
a US citizen.
Does that sound like a
viable MOTIVE for not showing his original birth certificate?
If all of the information shown on
the scan image were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the
original. If all of the information shown on Factcheck's photos were
true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original. If all of
the information we've seen is actually true, then why fabricate bogus
birth certificates when a real one can be made for $12? What is worth
committing felony document fraud just to keep it hidden?
Well, it's a lot more than that. This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive over 300 million
Americans in regards to Obama's true identity and birth origins. This
bogus birth certificate was used to deceive members of our government,
our judiciary, our armed forces, and law enforcement into believing that
Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural-born US citizen who
is constitutionally qualified to become president.
Obtaining a real birth certificate copy is the very last
thing that Obama would ever do, then or now, because it would absolutely
confirm that the images and photos posted on the Internet are forgeries
and would expose anyone involved in this fraud to criminal prosecution. Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing it?
There is no question that Obama
fails to meet the constitutional qualifications for being a natural-born
citizen because his father passed his British citizenship onto Obama as
a child and made him a dual citizen. But, what about the question of
document fraud? Has a crime been committed? Who's responsible? What if a
president was complicit in committing this document fraud and
intentionally covering it up by all legal means possible?
Conspiracies in presidential
elections do happen. Does "Watergate" ring a bell?
Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached for
selling Obama's Senate seat. It that act really worse than committing
felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of the United States
Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information?.
As people are wont to say at times
like this, "Where is the outrage?" Where, indeed.
Other Opinions
At the same time that Dr. Polarik saw Obama's alleged COLB, a
discussion of that image was taking place among the registered readers
of a popular blog (HotAir.com) that is a repository of top stories from
other blogs and websites. I had not seen these comments until now,
ten months after they were published. Although the Hot Air
community is mostly pro-Obama, a number of members had identified the
very same anomalies as I had while working independently. The
significance of this discovery cannot be overstated as it serves to
validate the work that I've done in proving this image, and ones to
follow, to be false, forged, and fabricated. Here, in their own
words, is what they said on June 12:
From JM Hanes:
it
really bothers me when something like this simply makes no sense.
I couldn't begin to guess who would have fiddled with the document -- or
the when & why either -- but I also can't think of a single logical
reason (including filters, sharpening, or conversions) that a scan of an
original document could result in the kind of selective pixelization/artifacting
in evidence here. Pasting from
one image into another, however, would produce precisely that effect.
"The pixilation around the text
is...completely inconsistent with the background, which is discontinuous
behind the text. Zoom in on the faint image of the reverse
"JUN 6 2007" in the lower middle of the document for comparison and
you’ll see that the regular jpeg pixel blocking is uninterrupted.
That’s part of whatever this original document was before someone
Photoshopped it. The SEAL was probably scanned from another actual
document and pasted up along with the necessary text. Nice try
with the "Photoshop filter" theory though! I n any case, if someone were
trying to make a real document look as fake as this one does, that would
still be a hoax.
From Spolitics:
The document looks fake, like the text
was layered over the background, not typed onto it. So I
downloaded the picture and checked the properties. According to
the file’s details, this document was originated in Adobe Photoshop CS3
Macintosh. That’s not proof of forgery, but
there’s no "date acquired" listed,
which would have indicated this was scanned.
From
LimeyGeek:
Zoom in on the lettering and check out the artefacts
surrounding them. I suspect this is a modern document, scanned,
original data scrubbed, and overlaid with digital text. Problem
is, then not all the text would match stylistically, so they had to go
over every bit of text with new lettering. Contrast the artifacts
surrounding the text on this document with the text in the top and
bottom bars -- that’s original text. The text in the body of the
document has been doctored. Obama is not claiming it as a
legitimate copy. I suspect it is somebody’s legitimate copy,
scanned, scrubbed and doctored to look like Obama’s.
As somebody
that works with the math and code in such software, I can tell you that
these artifacts are nothing of the sort. This is not a case of
lousy artifacts due to image encoding (jpeg). Such artifacts would
be consistent, these are not. In fact, if you look close enough,
you can see that the original lettering was slightly larger than the
superimposed fonts.
The point is that an original document would
have consistent artifacts due to scanning, and additional consistent
artifacts due to further encoding (in this case, jpeg
encoding/compression). Whatever
the origin of this document, it has been doctored.
From
RightWired:
It’s a 100%
forgery. There are numerous reasons, but the #1 reason: Laser
printers don’t add anti-aliasing to fonts. Zoom in to 600%
or greater in Photoshop or Corel. Look at an "A". Notice how
it’s smoothed a bit? You can see that the characters have been
laid on top of the green government background. There’s a hazy
white area in between the strokes of each line of the character.
When a laser printer prints on the paper, it basically burns it on with
a super high precision. It doesn’t turn the area behind the
actually copy white.
I work in advertising. I have studied
this...as well as our department’s graphic artist -- it’s fraudulent.
Also file properties say Adobe CS3, black copy is much darker than the
rest. The official seal is blurry and pixilated.
From Just
A Grunt:
Blending high contrast
type into a lower contrast background is particularly fussy work; it
looks to me like the original text and original background started out
at different resolutions as well. While text that bleeds
through from the other side of a document would look different from the
crisp text printed on the front, it wouldn’t change how the pixels in
the image itself are grouped. The integrity of the typical 8 x 8
pixel squares which you can see in the 6 shot aren’t busted up by
artifacts the way they are in the A shot. I may not be using the
right techno terms here -- alas, it’s easier to zero in on the anomalies
when you’re used to dealing with recalcitrant pixels than it is to
explain.
From WoosterOh:
I find it odd that every word is
pixilated around it, yet the black box is not. Those words are not
on the document. To me, it looks like it is from some HA HA
funny site that you can do your own certificates. Select a
background image, select text to put on the background image. I
guess that {the Certification of Live Birth is a computer-generated
printout) could account for the pixels, but I am not even sure that
accounts for it. You would have to assume that the generation
means taking a scan of an actual certification, using it as an image,
then generating text over that scan, then converting the text to an
image, then laying that image down over the scanned certificate.
Take the layers and flatten the image, then print the image. FAKE
From G Charles:
A word of caution -- I use Photoshop a fair
amount and I just zoomed in on the text.
I agree that this is not a scan of an
original document "AS IS". Nevertheless, it could well be a
scan of an original document that has been run through a Photoshop
filter once or twice. And the original may well look pretty much
the same to those who can’t zoom in on the photo. And as support
for my "Photoshop filter" theory, the seal carries the same pixilation
artifacts. Therefore it is NOT simply text that has been
superimposed -- whatever explanation there is has to account for the
seal and text having the same unnatural pixilation.
From
iurockhead:
Enlarge and the
text looks like it has been added on top of the green and white
background. I call fake. I don’t doubt his
citizenship and birthright, but that document is a fake.
From
wise_man:
And the black text on
this wide open field of the background, is awfully sharp and crisp for
being a copy.
From SilverStar830:
Looks
"chopped." It looks like an
exceptionally EASY document to fake.
From Buford:
When blown up it is clearly a fake.
At 2000% it is clear that the
pixilation of the text is much finer than the pixilation of the
background. It is an extremely low quality fake. If
this served any purpose but to drive traffic to the Kos site I would be
surprised.
From infidel65:
After repeated requests for
Obama’s birth certificate, a copy shows up on the Daily Kos. This
stinks to high heaven. The Obama campaign may have thought
they’d put this issue to bed, but they have only succeeded in fuelling
the suspicions.
Confused?
Does this Barack Obama birth certificate issue bug you
because, although improbable, it's possible that he's not a natural born
citizen, isn't eligible to be President under the Constitution, and this
issue could be bigger than Watergate -- or any other "gate" in history?
Are you afraid that if you were even to raise the subject with your
friends that they will think you wear a tinfoil hat, because
Factcheck.org, the final arbiter of truth in the universe, said so?
Are you with the news media, and after spending so much money to get
Barack Obama elected, you'd hate to ruin your investment?
Are you a talk radio host who thinks that if you say the burden of proof
needed to demonstrate one is eligible to be Commander in Chief should be
at least as high as, oh, say, the level to be eligible for Hawaiian
homestead status (see 1.F. below), that you'd be forced to give equal
time to someone who disagrees?
Are you a conservative, libertarian, or any conscientious
constitutionalist from any ideological side of life, who's convinced
something's not right, but you're afraid your reputation might be
tarnished because, after all, this could be one big Saul-Alinsky-style
set-up, and the joke would be on you?
Fear not! Joe the Farmer has prepared an outline showing that no
matter how this issue is ultimately resolved, you have legitimate
concerns, and that Barack Obama should, simply out of respect for the
nation he was elected to lead, disclose the sealed vault copy of his
birth certificate.
Given the circumstances, if Barack Obama respected this nation, he would
prove it by the simplest and easiest of gestures - unless, of course,
all this talk about change and hope was just a bunch of bull, and he's
just "another politician."
To date, the suspicions have not subsided, yet people are talking
about Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) as if it really exists.
Why? Because they know that foreign-born children are also
issued a COLB by Hawaii, and therefore, the COLB cannot confirm one's
natural-born status. Only the actual, "vault" original birth
certificate can, and Obama knows that better than anyone. What
other reason could there be for the occupant of the Oval Office to
refuse such a simple request?
Because, it is not a "simple
request," but a bombshell that blows Obama's entire claim to the
presidency right out of the water.
Now that you see the big
picture, what are you going to do about it?
A Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate
DC sources
say that an
Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form
birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The
source is an FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois
now in the Administration. It's second hand, but the source is supposed
to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special
paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960
Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access
was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large
Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The
blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual
typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was
the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate
seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only
reason they haven't rolled out the forgery yet is that it is
"seasoning" under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between
between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready....one to two months tops.
I personally don't put a lot of stock into this report. I have
included it here in the off-chance that a couple of months down the road
Obama suddenly releases his long-form birth certificate after his long and
expensive battle to keep it from the American People. If that happens,
this report will immediately gain a great deal of credibility.
Somebody finally asked Barack Obama's
White House press secretary about the president's elusive birth
certificate.
When
asked by WorldNetDaily.com White House
correspondent Les Kinsolving why Obama, who has pledged transparency in
his administration, would not release his long-form birth certificate to
establish his constitutional eligibility for office, spokesman Robert
Gibbels,
employing Alinsky's Rule 5, guffawed in unison with members of the Washington press corps,
about the concerns of 400,000 petitioners who have demanded it.
Here is the
video.
"Are you looking for the president's birth certificate?" Gibbels asked
incredulously. "Lester, this question in many ways continues to astound
me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy with the seal of the president's
birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people -- (laughter)
-- that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the
state of Hawaii of the president's birth there, but it's on the Internet
because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we'll
have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy."
It was the
first time any member of the press corps has publicly asked a member of
the administration a question directly related to Obama's constitutional
eligibility for office as a "natural born citizen."
Gibbels
continues the lie that Obama released his birth certificate. It's a
damnable lie. Obama has never released his birth certificate and Gibbels
and the rest of the White House staff knows it.
There are actually 3 lies in
Gibbels statement:
1. The State of Hawaii has never provided a
copy of Obama's birth certificate -- with or without a state seal --
never.
2. The State of Hawaii has never certified Obama was born
in Hawaii -- never.
3. There has never been an Obama birth certificate on the
Internet -- never.
Now you know why I refer to Gibbs as Gibbels.
He's Obama's propagandist.
Go here
for the background on Obama's bogus birth records, and
here for the law behind the
eligibility question.
Hawaii Changes The Rules
According to the
Hawaii
Star-Bulletin, the State of Hawaii, Department of Health no longer
issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said
spokeswoman Janice Okubo.
The department only issues
"certifications" of live births, and that is the "official birth
certificate" issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.
And, it's
only available in electronic form.
Okubo explained that the
Health Department went paperless in 2001.
"At that time, all
information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for
consistent reporting," she said.
Information about births is
transferred electronically from hospitals to the department.
"The
electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps
on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window
for most requests," Okubo said.
Asked for more information about
the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health
Department "does not have a short-form or long-form certificate."
"The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and
decades to conform to national standards and models," she said.
Okubo also emphasized the certification form "contains all the
information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions
requiring a birth certificate."
She added that the U.S. Supreme
Court has recognized the state's current certification of live birth "as
an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other
requirements."
The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii
birth certificate received national attention during last year's
presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama's American
citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his
campaign web site a fake.
Asked about that document, Okubo said,
"This is the same certified copy everyone receives when they request a
birth certificate."
Everything above is a lie. It
clearly demonstrates that officials in Hawaii's Department of Health are
engaged in a cover up and fraud.
Here is a long-form Hawaiian
"Certificate Of Live Birth" that was issued on September 28, 2010.
First They Will -- Then They Won't
The Hawaiian certification of live birth (COLB) the Obama
Campaign posted on the Internet as proof of his eligibility would not be
accepted for eligibility for some Hawaiian state government programs.
The website of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, states
clearly the COLB touted by the Obama campaign, White House press
secretary Robert Gibbels and a host of other Obama defenders is not
acceptable as a form of identification to qualify under this program.
There are two categories of documents used in
determining eligibility: primary and secondary.
Primary Documents
The primary documents used to
show you are of age and a qualified native Hawaiian are:
A
certified copy of Certificate of Birth; A certified copy of
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, including testimonies; or A
certified
copy of Certificate of Delayed Birth. You will need the
certified
birth certificates for:
Yourself Your biological father; and
Your biological mother The state Department of Health, (DOH), Vital
Records Section, records documents by island and district
(geographically) and by the date of the event (chronologically).
If your biological parents' documents don't clearly prove that you have
at least 50 percent Hawaiian ancestry, you will also need certified
birth certificates for:
Your biological father's parents; and
Your biological mother's parents.
In order to process your
application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the
original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This
is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live
Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original
Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the
computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by
DHHL.
Hawaii Home
Lands won't take it, but Obama insists it certifies him to be
Commander-in-Chief.
Update:
This item was cut 'n' paste from the DHHL website. Between 6/8/09
and 6/18/09 DHHL has scrubbed this site. In the past 10 days they
have changed the policy above. They will now accept Certifications
of Live Birth. Click the link now. Check it out.
A
coincidence? Suuuuuuuuure! The Obots continue to scrub the
Internet for the Obamamessiah.
I'm going to have to start caching
everything.
GOTCHA!
Here are three cached pages from the Department of Hawaiian Home
Lands document, "Applying for Hawaiian Home Lands," that proves that
Hawaii is actively supporting Obama's usurpation of the Office of the
Presidency.
Cover page
-- "Applying for Hawaiian Home Lands" Page 1 -- Primary documents --
"Certified copy of Certificate of Birth" Page 2 -- "DHHL utilizes
information that is only found only on the original Certificate of Live
Birth"
Commonality
Breaking News From Rush
Limbaugh’s Radio Program! Rush just
said:
"...you know, a lot of people talk about Obama and his messianic
complex. He does have one thing in common with God. Barack
Obama has one thing in common with God. Do you know what it is?
God does not have a birth certificate either."
Heh, heh, heh . . .
Happy Anniversary
Dr. Ron Polarik
reminds us that today, June 12th, 2009, marks the Anniversary of the Obama COLB Forgery.
Yes, a whole year has past since Obama committed felony document fraud
and posted a false
identification document on the Internet.
As battles go, the Obots
and the liberal media and blogsphere launched a bigger assault in
defense of this bogus birth certificate than the Battle of Stalingrad in
WWII.
It was
Factcheck.org and Politifact that mounted a full-court press against
the upstart "Birthers," a name given to them by the liberal "Truthers"
who conjured up more 9/11 conspiracies than Uncle Ben has rice.
When the liberal "Truthers," so-called for the "Truth Movement" they
started, went viral on so many Leftist websites that there wasn’t enough
Reynolds Wrap in the world to fashion hats for them all.
Now, the
shoe -- or "tin foil hat" -- is on the other foot...er...head.
Like Ron says, "It’s the forgery, Stupid!"
Here
is Polarik's final
report -- the culmination of over four months of intensive, empirical
research, the sole purpose of which has been to determine if the images
and photographs posted on the Internet are true reproductions of a
genuine document purported to be Obama's original birth certificate.
Hawaii Does Have Obama's Original Birth
Certificate
In July 2009, CNN's Lou Dobbs demanded Obama's original birth
certificate. That was followed by CNN/U.S. President Jon Klein
telling staffers of "Lou Dobbs Tonight" that the issue is a "dead"
story, according to a Los Angeles Times report.
In an e-mail, according to the Times, Klein wrote that CNN
researchers had determined that Obama's 1961 birth certificate no longer
exists because Hawai'i officials had discarded paper documents in 2001
-- a claim denied yesterday by Isle health officials.
In 2001, Hawai'i's paper documents were reproduced in electronic
format but "any paper data prior to that
still exists," Health
Department spokeswoman Okubo said.
Okubo would not say where Obama's original birth certificate is, but
said "we have backups for all of our backups."
The Birth Certificate Question
An Open Letter
to Shephard Smith at FOX News -- Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:44:05 PM · 99
of 113
We have no proof of where Obama was born. Anyone who
claims that he was born in Hawaii is suffering from
COLB Derangement
Syndrome. Hawaii never confirmed that he was born in Hawaii, never
confirmed that he has a Hawaiian long-form birth certificate or any
other US birth certificate on file, or even if they have anything
tangible beyond a computer record.
Most of all, Hawaii confirmed
that they never released a copy of Obama’s COLB to anyone in June 2007.
Einstein could have called himself, "Humpty Dumpty," and hid his
face, but that would not change the fact that he discovered E=mc². Likewise, Obama’s 2007 COLB would be just as nonexistent as if I had
never
discovered that it was nonexistent. But, it is a good thing that I
did.
It's positively amazing the amount of effort that people
have expended in defense of this piece of crap COLB image that the
Poseur-in-Chief now admits to posting online. There is only one reason
why, after more than a year, that only one scan image of one side only
has ever been made from what is alleged to be
Obama’s 2007 COLB: it
doesn't exist. Obama’s 2007 COLB is a forged fake, fabricated in
Photoshop, and nothing that anyone says or does can change that fact.
There is absolutely no reason, whatsoever, that the Obama Campaign
would not make another, more detailed scan, including one of the reverse
side of the COLB, and send that out to quiet critics. No reason, EXCEPT
that the document does not exist in the real world. It only exists in
the unreal, virtual world of Photoshopped fakes.
BTW, a digital
photo is not the same thing as a scan image, and it most certainly
cannot be used to validate a scan image. Certainly not when the document
object is photographed at a steep angles from the capture device (which
were intentional).
Remember that
Factcheck.org did not take a digital
photo of the reverse side (all that Factcheck photographed was only 1/4
of the entire back page, and only 2/3 of the Seal). Why was so little of
the back page shown? Because what was photographed belonged to a
different COLB!! Check it out for yourself: the Seal on the reverse side
does not match the one on the front side. It is one of several, new
discoveries I've made after revisitng the Factcheck photographs.
A year later after the bogus scan image was posted, THAT is exactly what
people are still talking about. They are referring back to the original
forged image on Fight the Smears and Factcheck. They are quoting Factcheck -- the
co-conspirator in this birth certficate scam -- as
having "verified" the bogus "scan image."
Recall that Factcheck
claimed they photographed the same object that the Obama Campaign
scanned two months earlier.
They took these photos SOLELY IN DEFENSE of
the scan image that they alleged to have "validated," and to fend off
the widespread criticism of the COLB as a forged image. However, they
failed to "debunk" the critics. This was all part of an elaborate ruse
to create the illusion that Obama had released his genuine, certified
original birth certificate to the public.
What is hard to believe
are the people in high places who actually believe that this document
exists, but of those, here is a segment who also discount it as being
proof of where Obama was actually born. COLBs are incredibly easy to get
with little documentation required. And, yes, it is a well-documented
fact that Hawaii was giving COLBs to foreign-born children.
But
the bottom line is that the original "scan image" is what people are
still talking about today, and it is an indisputable fact that Obama, or
anyone else, does not have a genuine 2007 COLB document. What
is posted online is as bogus as a four-dollar bill.
Obama
ascended to the position of President by fraudulent means, including
document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and campaign funding fraud,
to name a few. The only question at hand now is whether he will be
removed by invalidating his election, or by the articles of impeachment. If I were a Democratic Congressman, and I was going to be implicated in
this fraud, I'd be calling for impeachment in a New York minute.
The only thing I'll
sign is a petition for Obama, Obama for America, and Factcheck to be
charged with
criminal document fraud and Internet fraud for creating and
proffering a false identification document, aka the fabricated COLB
image posted on Obama's website, among others, that Press Secretary
Gibbs publicly admitted was put there by the aforementioned President of
the United States and his Presidential Administration.
These said
individuals and parties did willingly, and with malice aforethought,
violate
Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and
related activity in connection with identification documents,
authentication features, and information, by creating and preferring
what they allege was Obama's actual, original birth certificate, but
was, in fact, a false identification document as defined by statute
below:
A "false identification document" is any document *or
facsimile of a document) of a type intended or commonly accepted for the
purposes of identification of individuals that -- (A) is not issued by or
under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the
authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for
purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the
authority of the United States Government, a State, a political
subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of
a foreign government, or an international governmental or
quasi-governmental organization.
The Obama Administration, the
Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, Factcheck.org, and Barack Hussein
Obama as the principle mastermind of this document fraud who directed
the creation and distribution of a false identification document for
himself, are hereby charged with the commission of felony document
fraud, punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, and a maximum fine
of $250,000 for each offense.
It is a statement of fact, and
admission therewith, that the Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, did
create a minimum of three (3) false identification document copies and
distributed said copies to the Daily Kos, Factcheck, and Politifact;
and, additionally, posted the original false identification document on
Obama's own website, "My.BarackObama.com" and also on a separate website
known as, "Fight The Smears."
Furthermore, two months after the
creation and distribution of these false identification documents, Obama
for America, in collusion with Factcheck.org, a subsidiary of the
Annenberg Public Policy Center, owned by the Annenberg Foundation and
funded by billionaire George Soros, created and posted nine (9)
photographs of what they further alleged was the same, false
identification document that they had earlier alleged was a scanned
facsimile of Obama's original birth certificate -- thus compounding
their earlier offenses with further violations of the same statutes.
In all, then presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, his
campaign organization, d/b/a Obama for America, and Annenberg's Factcheck.org organization are hereby charged with thirteen (13) separate
violations of Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028.
It is further alleged that these individuals and organizations, by
virtue of displaying and promoting these fraudulent images as genuine
government-issued documents, to the voting populaces of all 50 states in
the Union, are hereby, also guilty of committing Internet fraud, in
violation of individual state laws and Federal laws.
Lastly,
these false documents are also in violation of Hawaiian state forgery
statues as the State Government of Hawaii was directly deceived and
harmed irrespective of the other charges.
I call upon the
Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Attorneys General of the other
49 states, the DC District Attorney, the Attorney General of the United
States, and the Congress of the United States to launch their own
investigations of the crimes committed against the respective state and
national governments, and the citizens under these jurisdictions.
Who Is Behind Quashing The Birth Certificate Issue?
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional
eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the
radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it
was to find my then-92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was
possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in
Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t
speak English. Despairing that she would never be "qualified" to
receive the care [in a nursing home} that she desperately needed, I set
about to find the document, which I was sure had vanished in the
unreliable record-keeping of 1913. When I called the third number,
I explained to the woman who answered the phone that I was "asking
something impossible." I gave her my mother’s first name and her
father’s last name. Within four minutes, she said, "Here it is!"
When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: "That’s
nothing…we’re routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s,
and we do that all the time!" Total time it took me to find my
mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes!
Obama was born not in 1913, like my mother, but in 1961. So it
was quite curious that not one cyber-sleuth could find an authentic,
verifiable copy of his original vault copy birth certificate. I’m
not talking about the faux version Obama posted on his website, which
was deemed the real thing by FactCheck.org, a "truth"-detecting site
that is sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that
hired Obama and his terrorist pal William Ayers and gave them millions
of dollars for a research project in Chicago. In other words, the
least credible source!
Even more significant is that no one in
the media thought Obama’s missing birth certificate worth even casual
mention. Their thinking seemed to be: If we’re not going to check
on his eligibility to be president, then why question why the other
crucial documents were -- and continue to be -- sealed? For
instance: his baptism certificate; elementary, high school, college and
graduate school transcripts; visa(s); selective service record; alleged
multiple Social Security numbers; Illinois attorney’s license; Illinois
State Senate records; law practice client list; Univ. of Chicago
scholarly articles; financial records while a community organizer in
Chicago; and medical records. I’m also curious about why Michelle
Obama’s law license was suspended in 1993 by the Illinois Supreme Court,
but then again she wasn’t running for president.
Instead, the
media were frantically busy trying to divert public attention away from
those pesky things known as credentials with gossip-driven tabloid
reportage of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber in order to avoid the
bigger-than-Watergate potential scandal of whether or not Obama was
eligible -- according to the U.S. Constitution -- to become President of
the United States!
NOW WE KNOW WHY
In an explosive
interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on
August 7th, Douglas Hagmann -- a respected journalist, director of the
Northeast Intelligence Network and longtime private investigator, and
Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada
Free Press -- the reason for the media blackout about the
birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire
threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major
TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission
officials!
According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a
nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously,
after Obama was elected but before he was inaugurated:
• A
major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the
birth certificate issue or risk losing his job.
• FCC officials
threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates, and
make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine "look mild" in comparison to
other consequences.
• In at least one corporate TV
headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-air employees not to
mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specific subjects
like Obama’s Illinois lawyer’s license, his college records, etc., under
both implied and explicit threats.
Hawaii Confirms Obama’s Vital Records Have Been Amended
Leo D'Onofrio says he will be assisting one of his readers in filing
litigation in Hawaii state circuit court pursuant to her ongoing request
for public information denied by Hawaii officials. (Readers of his
blog will recognize her as MissTickly, aka TerriK.)
Correspondence sent to TerriK by Hawaii officials indicates that Obama’s
vital records have been amended and official records pertaining thereto
are maintained by the state of Hawaii.
TerriK was originally
interested in whether or not Obama made a request to amend his records
and to inspect them for the purpose of amending. Those requests
(not the actual amendments) do not appear to be protected according to
the statute and various opinions issued by the state... regardless...
TerriK's requests to see the amendments had to be answered in one of
three ways according to the statute and the manual:
1. we have
the record you requested and will provide them
2. we don't
maintain the records you requested (aka we don't have any such records
in file)
3. we have the records, but you are not entitled to see
them
She was told on two occasions by an Office of Information
Practices (OIP) staff attorney that if no such records exist, they must
notify her of that fact.
Eventually that same staff attorney,
acting on advice of the Department of Health (DoH) told TerriK that the
records were not available as they were protected. Their official
response was that she wasn't allowed access to those records...
They never told her that they didn't maintain these records she
requested. If they didn't have such records, then they would have
been required to tell her the records don't exist.
D'Onofrio will
issue a full statement and press release on behalf of TerriK via his
blog in the days ahead. This statement will include a complete
history of correspondence between TerriK and Hawaii state officials in
the OIP and the DoH.
And here is the proof that Obama's "Certification of Live Birth" means
nothing.
Amended certifications of birth may be
prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law,
for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed
with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign
country.
In other words, the "Certification of Live Birth" posted on Obama's
website, Factcheck.org and the Daily KOS doesn't prove anything, simply
because someone born in a foreign country could file for an amended
certification -- click the link, read it for yourself.
The
simple fact is, the paper version of this "COLB" has never been examined
by any controlling legal authority. The only people to have ever seen
this document are Obama's operatives in his campaign and at
FactCheck.org.
A Certification of Live Birth is not a Birth
Certificate. Obama's sister Maya was born in Jakarta,
Indonesia, but Anna Dunham registered her as "born
in Honolulu" shortly after her birth.
Maya has a State of Hawaii Certification of Live Birth, just like Obama --
proves nothing.
Here is a source that claims Maya was born in Honolulu. We
know that is not true, but it demonstrates the mendacity of Obots.
What Will Obama Say To Nathan Deal?
The Post & Email
asks, will an official request by a group of congressmen to see
Obama's birth certificate be the straw that breaks this camel's back?
Georgia’s representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in
early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a
joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main
Stream Media, and even the
Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of
private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the
liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal -- whose only interest
is to quiet the nation -- shows that they have no substantive reason to
oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama
cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles
nothing is a secret.
The answer must come soon. Deal said
that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on
the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode
his political influence in Washington, DC.
Obama has been
effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support,
publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns
such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue
in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the
world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a
Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven
a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have
studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the
allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he
has something to hide.
Palins
remark that it
is a valid issue and Ogden’s
resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week,
following the sending of Nathan Deal’s letter, appear to be diagnostic
signs that the political establishment understands the risks and
imminent crisis about to break.
Even the pulse of Obama’s
political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them
posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain
only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the
cheers of "Change," which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama
for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum
of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the
resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than
those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
Hawaii Launches Obama Birth Queries Firewall
Bob Unruh
reports that Hawaii has launched a defense against Obama birth
queries. The Department of Health has posted a "vital records" Web page
-- "obama.html" -- that says they aren't answering any more questions
about Barack Obama, the mysterious circumstances surrounding his birth,
and/or what documentation is in their possession.
click image for large copy
It could be that the state of Hawaii is overwhelmed by --
or is just annoyed at -- the number of inquiries about the birth records
of Barack Obama.
The state has launched a new Web page with the
information it wants the public to know about its Obama records,
including the fact that state law does not "require agencies to respond
to all questions asked of the agency."
After all, a new poll
confirms just 51 percent of Americans believe Obama eligible for the
office he now holds.
The recent WND/Wenzel Poll indicated 32.6
percent of Americans said they do not consider Obama a "legitimate"
president and another 15.8 percent said they were unsure. The poll
updated a survey six months ago in which most Americans said they were
aware of the dispute.
Kinda
makes you curious to know what's in that documentation. It's as
guarded as the "Go Codes." The greatest secret in the Age of Obama
is Obama's bona fides -- the stuff that the rest of us have to present
with regularity.
Attorney General Will Not
Corroborate Obama Birth
The Post & Email is reporting
that while political momentum is building within the Democratic Party
from coast to coast to make the
issue of Obama’s claims to be born in
Hawaii a litmus test for its political opponents in the 2010 general
elections for Congress, a key component in such a strategy has been
undermined by the Hawaii Attorney General’s Office.
In
correspondence with The Post & Email, Jill T. Nagamine, Deputy Attorney
General for the State of Hawaii, has made it clear that her office will
not corroborate or back in any way the July 27, 2009 Statement of Dr.
Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, which
declared Obama Hawaiian-born and a "natural-born American citizen."
The stunning admission was made in an email sent to the Editor of
this paper yesterday evening.
The implications of this denial are
catastrophic for the Democratic strategy.
The Hawaii Attorney
General’s office has the duty to prosecute the laws of the State. Mark
J. Bennett, the current Attorney General, was appointed to the office by
Governor Lingle on Jan. 3, 2003. He is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney
General for Honolulu, and a graduate of Cornell’s Law School. Bennett is
the first Republican to hold the office in 40 years.
According to
published reports, Dr. Fukino has admitted that her July 27th
statement
received the verbal approval of the Hawaii Attorney General, who "o.k.’d
it."
In an attempt to corroborate the contents of Dr. Fukino’s
statement and understand better the value of that testimony, I put the
following two questions to Nagamine, as a member of the press.
I
am seeking some information in response to 2 questions I have. Please
understand that your response(s) or non-response will be quoted by our
paper.
Q. 1: Does the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health
have any statutory duty or authority to define the citizenship status of
anyone whose vital record(s) are kept by that department?
Q.2:
According to the legal references employed by your office, what is the
definition of a "natural-born citizen" of the United States of America?
I put my question to the Deputy Attorney General to avoid putting
the Attorney General in a situation of a conflict of interest, if he in
fact, did, as Dr. Fukino claims, advise her regarding her July
statement.
Nagamine, in response, asserted that any answer to
such questions given by her office would represent a conflict of
interest for her office. And that is an explicit admission that Dr. Fukino had no statutory authority nor duty to make such a statement, and
that the Attorney General’s office will not stand behind Fukino’s claim
that Obama is a "natural-born American citizen." It is such, because if Fukino’s declaration had legal weight of any kind, surely a response to
my questions would have corroborated that without such a
conflict-of-interest scenario. You only have a conflict if the Fukino
claim would not be supported by a Nagamine response.
The Hiwaii DOH web page about
Obama’s
birth records says, in paragraph 4, "Records pertaining to the
Department of Health database for vital statistics information are not
required to be disclosed by the Uniform Information Practices Act
because those records, by their very nature, must be confidential in
order for the government to avoid the frustration of a legitimate
government function (see HRS §92F-13(3)). Disclosing such
information compromises the department’s ability to protect the
integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and
to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital
statistics system as is required by HRS §338-18."
IOW, if they
revealed that Obama’s birth (and the births of others out of state) was
supported only by a personal claim by the mother (or grandmother), it
would expose the DOH itself for being fraudulent or incompetent.
The DOH is likely using this part of the UIPA to hide that it has
widespread systemic problems in how it has traditionally registered
births.
"Obama" Not On Hawaii Birth Database Document
The Post & Email is reporting that the Hawaii Department of Health
has sent them an Adobe document containing an alphabetical list of births,
produced from the Hawaii Birth Index database,
containing the names of those issued Certificates of Hawaiian Birth from
1911 to 1971, for those who did not get a standard Birth certificate, at
birth." The name
Obamadoes not exist. Here is an
image of the "Ob*" page from the document:
Click
here to read the details and how John Charlton came into its possession. Verrrrrrrry interesting . . .
Did Hawaii Have Any Records On Obama Before
2006?
The
following are the closing paragraphs of the Post & Email's article.
The full article, including email exchanges is
here.
Since the Hawaii Department of Health has
not responded to Mr. Charlton’s UIPA request of March 4, it appears that
they have affirmed that there is no documentation on file to indicate
that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. If Obama’s name appeared in
the Birth Index, this information would have been released many months
ago to quell the rising doubts about Obama’s birth story. Then
there would be no need for the secrecy and attempts to limit the
public’s access to information.
Perhaps Obama presented some type
of evidence to Dr. Fukino and received a COLB. Perhaps that is why
the certificate number has always been
obliterated: it does not correspond to the series used in 1961
because it was issued much later. According to the Western
Journalism Center, there are five
different ways
in which a Hawaiian birth record can be obtained, including as an adult.
According to Hawaii’s UIPA law, once Fukino made a
public statement about
Obama’s records, the index data, or pieces of information used to
formulate the statement, should have been readily available to the
public upon request. Despite its declarations of openness in
government, Hawaii officials, particularly Fukino, have refused to
follow their own law. Why the obfuscation if there is nothing to
hide?
The Post & Email will not stop its investigation until we
receive answers to these questions.
Is it possible that the
Director of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, granted Obama a "Certification
of Live Birth" sometime in 2006 or later when he was planning to run for
president? Fukino is the only person in the United States to
affirm that Obama was born in Hawaii. No hospital, doctor, nurse,
witness or other individual has come forward to corroborate her story.
New Hawaii Law Shuns Obama Birth Document
Requests
The AP is
reporting that it's now law in Hawaii that the state government can
ignore repetitive requests for Barack Obama's birth certificate.
Republican Gov. Linda Lingle signed into law Wednesday a bill allowing
state government agencies not to respond to follow-up requests for
information if they determine that the subsequent request is duplicative
or substantially similar to a previous request.
The law is aimed
at so-called "Birthers," who
claim Obama is ineligible to be president. They contend the
Democratic president was born outside the United States [among other
things], and therefore doesn't meet the constitutional requirement for
being president.
Both Fukino and the state registrar of vital
statistics have verified that the Health Department holds Obama's
original birth certificate.
Health Department officials supported
the law because the state still gets between 10 and 20 e-mails seeking
verification of Obama's birth each week, most of them from outside
Hawaii.
A few of those requesters file repeated inquiries seeking
the same information, even after they're told state law bars release of
a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible
interest.
Advocates for openness in government oppose the law
because they fear it could be used to ignore legitimate requests for
information.
If There Is One, Hawaii Would Have
It
From the Hawaii Revised Statutes:
92-31 Disposition of original record. A photograph,
microphotograph, reproduction on film, or electronic form of a
government record shall be placed in conveniently accessible
files and provisions made for preserving, examining, and using the
same. Thereafter, a public officer, after having first
received the written approval of the comptroller as provided in
section 94-3, may cause such record, paper, or document to be
destroyed. The comptroller may require, as a prerequisite to
the granting of such approval, that a reproduction or print of such
photograph, microphotograph, or reproduction on film, or electronic
form of the record be delivered into the custody of the public
archives for safekeeping. The comptroller may also require the
delivery into the custody of another governmental department or
agency or a research library of any such record, paper, or document
proposed to be destroyed under the provisions of this section.
So, either the original microfiche copy is still available or a
complete reproduction of it in electronic form is available.
To put something in electronic form and not copy all the data on the
original document would be against the law. Where these files
have to be accessible and provisions have to be made for examining
them, it would be misleading for the Department of Health to say
that the information on the original Certificate of Live Birth
is no longer available. Under Hawaii Revised Stautes 338-18,
those with a direct and tangible interest in the record are
permitted inspection of public health statistics records. That
would include either the microfiche or electronic copy of the
original Certificate of Live Birth.
Another Obama Double Standard
The White House
appears to be laying the groundwork for Barack Obama to shake the
hand of each senior at Kalamazoo Central High School’s commencement
ceremony next month.
Seniors are being asked to provide their
birthdates, Social Security numbers and citizenship status to the Secret
Service so background checks could be performed. Such a check is
required for anyone who gets within an arm’s length of Obama, students
were told at their senior breakfast Friday.
Of the fact that the
White House is requesting information on all the graduating seniors,
K-Central Principal Von Washingon Jr. told the students, "I’ll let you
figure out what that means," said senior Simon Boehme, who was at the
breakfast.
"Everyone is excited that we might have the
opportunity to shake the president’s hand," Boehme said.
Boehme and the entire class ought
to respond, "We'll show you our birth certificates, if you'll show us
yours."
The Summary CNN Doesn't Want You to See
Butterdezillion
says the Hawaii Department of Health (DHOH) has indirectly confirmed
that Obama's Factcheck Certification of Live Birth (COLB) is a forgery
because:
They have made a statutory admission that Obama's BC is amended,
which is required to be shown on a legitimate COLB but is not shown
on the FactCheck COLB.
They have said that Oahu birth certificates have always been given
the birth certificate number by the HDOH on the "date filed."
The FactCheck COLB has a "date filed" 3 days earlier than the Nordyke twins' but was given a number later than theirs.
This statement by Okubo rules out past explanations (hospitals
numbering the BC's or being given blocks of numbers, or BC's sitting
in piles at the HDOH for days before being numbered). This
means that either the "date filed," certificate number, or both have
been altered on the FactCheck COLB.
Because Obama's genuine Certificate of Live Birth
(BC) is amended, Hawaii law (HRS 338-17) says that it has no legal value
unless it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative
person or body, and they rule the BC to be probative. Obama has
fought lawsuits to make sure that his BC could never be presented as
evidence, even though it is the only way he can have any birth facts
legally determined.
The 20th Amendment of the Constitution says
that if a President elect "fails to qualify" by Jan 20th, the Vice
President elect is to "act as President" until a President qualifies.
Because the required procedure to legally determine Obama's birth
facts has never happened, we know that Obama could not have "qualified"
by January 20th, and anybody who certified his eligibility documentably
perjured him/herself, since even his age has never been legally
determined, and could disqualify him from eligibility for the Office of
President.
The President elect becomes President automatically at
noon on Jan 20th, but there are 2 Constitutional requirements that must
be met before a sitting President can "act as President," or exercise
the Presidential powers: he must take the oath of office and he must
"qualify." Doing one of the 2 is not enough, and in no way impacts
the need to meet the other requirement.
Obama has "failed to
qualify," and the only person the 20th Amendment allows to "act as
President" is Joe Biden, until a president qualifies. All this is
known simply because his birth certificate has been amended, and he has
never presented it as evidence so it could possibly gain legal
evidentiary value.
Drudge has this image and headline on his website, and it's
linked to a
Politico article that had almost 2,000 comments as of 7
AM (EST). The comments are running 99% against Obama.
click image to
view video snippet
This is not the first time
Obama has addressed the "birth certificate" -- a term that has come
to symbolize all of his missing documentation.
This issue is never, ever going to go away until he releases that
$12.50 long-form birth certificate.
As a matter of fact,
polls demonstrate that more and more Americans are joining the ranks
of the skeptics.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Mr. President, you're an
American born Christian.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Uh-huh.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: And yet, increasing and now significant numbers of
Americans in polls, upwards of a fifth of respondents are claiming
you are neither. A fifth of the people, just about, believe
you're a Muslim.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Keep in mind, those two
things -- American born and Muslim -- are not the same. So --
but I understand your point.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Either or the
latter, and the most recent number is the latter. This has to
be troubling to you. This is, of course, all new territory for
an American President.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, look, the --
the facts are the facts, right? So, we went through some of
this during the campaign. You know, there is a mechanism, a
network of misinformation, that in a new media era can get churned
out there constantly. We dealt with this when I was first
running for the U.S. Senate. We dealt with it when we were
first running for the Presidency. There were those who said I
couldn't win as U.S. Senator because I had a funny name. And
people would be too unfamiliar with it. And yet, we ended up
winning that Senate seat in Illinois because I trusted in the
American people's capacity to get beyond all this nonsense and focus
on is this somebody who cares about me and cares about my family and
has a vision for the future? And so, I will always put my
money on the American people. And I'm not going to be worrying
too much about whatever rumors are floating on -- out there.
If I spend all my time chasing after that then I wouldn't get much
done.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Even a number as sizeable as this --
what does it say to you? Does it say anything about your
communications or the effectiveness of your opponents to --
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, look, Brian, I -- I would say that I can't
spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my
forehead. (LAUGHS) It -- it is what -- the facts are the
facts. And so, it's not something that I can I think spend all
my time worrying about. And I don't think the American people
want me to spend all my time worrying about it.
You'll notice,
Obama didn't answer Williams' direct question. He ridicules it
with an Alinsky Rule 5
response.
That's
not going to work Barack, Barry, Soebarkah -- or whatever your name is!
And,
Obama's reference to "facts" is ludicrous. There are absolutely NO
FACTS to support Obama's mythology. His entire life history is
hidden behind a stonewall of money, lawyers, and frightened politicians,
judges, and journalists.
Famous Dead French Artist Supports Birther
Position
Squeeky, girl reporter,
says that a famous dead French artist named Rene Magritte spoke from
beyond the grave to endorse the Birther philosophy that you just cannot
trust picture! He produced a painting called the "Treachery of
Images" that shows a pipe with the French words "Ceci n'est pas une
pipe."
Translated to English, "Ceci n'est pas une pipe"
means "this is not a pipe."
As Rene Magritte said:
"The famous pipe. How people reproached me
for it! And yet, could you stuff my pipe? No, it's just
a representation, is it not? So if I had written on my picture
"This is a pipe," I'd have been lying!"
What Magritte was saying is, this is only a
picture of a pipe. It's NOT the pipe itself. This supports
the Birther position that the Internet copy of Obama's birth
certificate, is just that, a representation, or a picture, of the actual
document, NOT the document itself. That is why we keep hollering,
"Show us the Birth Certificate!!!"
"ceci n'est pas une acte
de naissance"
Sooo, the next time an Obot tells you to look at
the Internet and you can see Obama's birth certificate, just say to them:
"ceci n'est pas une acte de naissance" -- "this is not a birth
certificate" -- heh, heh, heh!
NO, I repeat, NO qualified,
independent forensic document examiner has ever been allowed to examine
the REAL document that the Internet image represents.
We KNOW
that Hawaii Health Department Communications Officer, Janice Okubo, has
said, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a
doubt what the image on the site represents."
U. S. Standard Certificate Of Live Birth
The recommended data requirements as
defined by the U. S. Department of Health, Center for Disease
Control.
Obots often point to states, such as Hawaii and Missouri
that claim to only issue short-form birth certificates as proof that the
data commonly found on long-form birth certificates are not maintained.
That is a foolish notion.
The states are empowered to run
their own information facilities as they choose, however, to remain in
compliance with the reporting requirements of the federal government, it
is "recommended" that the data identified as "standard" and described in
this document be maintained by the states "for reporting purposes."
The Chief Information Officer (CIO), or Chief Technology Officer
(CTO) knows exactly how to read these recommendations -- these
"recommendations" ARE requirements. Read the CDC's subtle
directive:
"It is critical that all registration areas
follow these standards as closely as possible..."
"As part of the revision
process, CDC/NCHS has developed sets of detailed specifications for
collecting and reporting the items on the birth and death certificates
and fetal death report, which are all available on this Web site.
It is critical that all registration areas follow these standards as
closely as possible to promote uniformity in data collection across
registration areas. Included with the draft specifications is an
"overview." The overview gives the rationale behind the approaches
taken to develop the specifications."
The states are
independent entities and are entitled to run their own shops.
However, the states know that if they do not comply with these
"recommendations," their federal monies can and will be affected.
A Nail In The COLB Coffin
NoBarack08
is reporting that Barack Hussein
Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB), the one that has been posted
all over the Internet, first the
DailyKos,
then
Fight The Smears and the at
FactCheck.org, has now been proven to be a fake, fabricated, and
forged document. There is no doubt that the original is not an
authentic State of Hawaii, Department of Health issued document.
NoBarack08 has established what appears to be proof that the original
COLB that was posted had no number or lettering indicating that it was
never issued by the State of Hawaii Department of Health. It was
based on a blank template, and nothing more.
Good stuff! Too much to post
here, but check it out
here.
He also
provides directions to replicate the process, so you can see for
yourself.
This is
probably why Janice Okubo, the Communications Officer for the Hawaii
Department of Health is
on record saying, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even
say beyond a doubt what the image on the site [FactCheck.org]
represents."
Dr. Fukino Has Resigned Or Been Fired
In a
blog post at Obama's Garden MissTickly has the following information
about Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health:
[Ed Note: I want to be sure everyone understands what has happened:
Dr. Fukino has resigned or been fired. I received an autoreply
telling me SEVEN minutes after I sent her a UIPA request this evening.
It is with a heavy heart that I announce to you that I received this
from Dr. Fukino’s former email account:
From: "Fukino, Chiyome L." To: [Redacted]
Sent: Mon, December 6, 2010 8:53:00 PM Subject: Out of Office
AutoReply: UIPA Request -- State and National guidelines etc.
pertaining to seal
"Out of Office AutoReply: UIPA Request --
State and National guidelines etc. pertaining to seal
I am no
longer with the Department of Health. Please send emails to
dohdir@doh.hawaii.gov. Thank you."
This was the UIPA request the autoreply was in
response to, for the record. It is VERY significant in light of Dr.
Fukino’s departure because it refers to the direct evidence that Obama
used his own seal to "certify" the COLB image posted online.
Update:For the record, the Omsbudsman’s Office was told
that with the new administration coming in, Fukino left.
Fukino has been providing cover for
Obama with her selective leaks of information favorable to Obama's
mythology, while burying anything potentially unfavorable.
Neil
Abercrombie is coming in as Hawaii's new governor. Any problems
Obama has had with records or record-keeping down there will be
mitigated shortly.
